From sewer inspection programmes to rehabilitation needs: Research and results related to data quality and availability with the support of numerical experiment

European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1145-1156

  Ahmadi, Mehdi ^a,b   Cherqui, Frédéric ^c,d   De Massiac, Jean Christophe ^b   Le Gauffre, Pascal ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b G2C Environnement   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

asset management; data management; decision support system; inspection programme; numerical experiment

Indexed keywords

ASSET MANAGEMENT; BUDGET CONTROL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INSPECTION; NUMERICAL METHODS;

CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION; DATA AVAILABILITY; EXPERIMENT METHODS; MANAGEMENT SCENARIOS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OPERATIONAL PRACTICES; PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL CONDITION;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84908261356     PISSN: 19648189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2014.893212     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Ahmadi, M., Cherqui, F., De Massiac, J.-C., &, Le Gauffre, P. (2013). Influence of available data on sewer inspection program efficiency. Urban Water Journal, 17 p. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2013.831910
2. Ahmadi, M., Cherqui, F., De Massiac, J. C., &, Le Gauffre, P. (accepted). Benefits of using basic, imprecise or uncertain data for elaborating sewer inspection programs. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.
3. Ahmadi, M., Cherqui, F., De Massiac, J. C., Werey, C., Lagoutte, S., &, Le Gauffre, P. (2014). Condition grading for dysfunction indicators in sewer asset management. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 10, 346-358.
4. Alegre, H., Hirner, W., Baptista, J. M., &, Parena, R. (2000). Performance indicators for water supply services IWA (International Water Association) manual of best practice. London: IWA.
5. Ana, E., &, Bauwens, W. (2010). Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water Journal, 7, 47-59. 10.1080/15730620903447597
6. Berardi, L., Giustolisi, O., Savic, D. A., &, Kapelan, Z. (2009). An effective multi-objective approach to prioritisation of sewer pipe inspection. Water Science & Technology, 60, 841-850. 10.2166/wst.2009.432
7. Berlin, M., Suresh, Kumar G., &, Nambi, Indumathi M. (2013). Numerical modelling on fate and transport of nitrate in an unsaturated system under non-isothermal condition. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 17, 350-373.
8. Boissier, D., &, Al-Hajjar, J. (1993). Système Interactif dAide à la décision (SIAD) et incertain en génie civil [Decision aid interactive system (SIAD) and uncertain in civil engineering]. EUROPIA 93: Delft.
9. Bouchon-Meunier, B. (1995). La logique floue et ses applications [Fuzzy logic and its applications]. Addison Wesley, p. 257.
10. Breysse, D., Vasconcelos, E., &, Schoefs, F. (2007). Management strategies and improvement of performance of sewer networks. Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22, 462-477. 10.1111/mice.2007.22.issue-7
11. Cashman, A., Savic, D., Saul, A., Ashley, R., Walters, G., Blanksby, J., Djordjevic, S., Unwin, D., &, Kapelan, Z. (2004). Whole life costing of sewers (Cost-S): Developing a sustainable approach to sewer network management. Proceedings Novatech. Lyon, France.
12. Clément, A., Laurens, S., Arliguie, G., &, Deby, F. (2012). Numerical study of the linear polarisation resistance technique applied to reinforced concrete for corrosion assessment. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 16, 491-504.
13. Curt, C., &, Boissier, D. (2008). Utilisation de la théorie des possibilités pour lévaluation de la performance des barrages [Use of possibility theory for assessing dams performance]. 26e Rencontres de lAssociation Universitaire du Génie Civil, Université de Nancy, juin 4-6. Actes sur CD-ROM, 8 p.
14. Davies, J. P., Clarke, B. A., Whiter, J. T., Cunningham, R. J., &, Leidi, A. (2001). The structural condition of rigid sewer pipes: A statistical investigation. Urban Water, 3, 277-286. 10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00036-X
15. Dirksen, J. (2013). Monitoring ground settlement to guide sewer asset management (PhD thesis). TUD Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands, 175 p.
16. Dirksen, J., Clemens, F. H. L. R., Korving, H., Cherqui, F., Le Gauffre, P., Ertl, T.,. Snaterse, C. T. M. (2013). The consistency of visual sewer inspection data. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 214-228. 10.1080/15732479.2010.541265
17. Ellis, J. B., &, Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L. (Eds.). (2006). Assessing infiltration and exfiltration on the performance of Urban Sewer Systems. London: IWA, p. 192.
18. Hahn, M., Palmer, R., Merrill, M., Lukas, A., &, Lukas, A. (2002). Expert system for prioritizing the inspection of sewers: Knowledge base formulation and evaluation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 128, 121-129. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:2(121)
19. Knolmar, M., &, Szabo, G. C. (2003). CARE-S report D3-WP2 Structural condition-Classification systems based on visual inspection. Technical report of the CARE-S project, Budapest University of Technology and Economics., 192 p.
20. Koo, D.-H., &, Ariaratnam, S. T. (2006). Innovative method for assessment of underground sewer pipe condition. Automation in Construction, 15, 479-488. 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.007
21. Le Gauffre, P., &, Cherqui, F. (2009). Sewer rehabilitation criteria evaluated by fusion of fuzzy indicators. LESAM 2009-3rd IWA Leading Edge Conference on Strategic Asset Management. Miami, US.
22. Le Gauffre, P., Joannis, C., Vasconcelos, E., Breysse, D., Gibello, C., &, Desmulliez, J. J. (2007). Performance indicators and multicriteria decision support for sewer asset management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13, 105-114. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(105)
23. Malm, A., Svensson, G., Bäckman, H., &, Morrison, G. M. (2013). Prediction of water and wastewater networks rehabilitation based current age and material distribution. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 13, 227-237.
24. Marlow, D., &, Burn, S. (2008). Effective use of condition assessment within asset management. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 100, 54-63.
25. Marlow, D., Heart, S., Burn, S., Urquhart, A., Gould, S., Anderson, M., Cook, S., Ambrose, M., Madin, B., &, Fitzgerald, A. (2007). Condition assessment strategies and protocols for water and wastewater utility assets. London: WERF-Water Environment Research Foundation/IWA, p. 476.
26. Matos, R., Ashley, R. M., Cardoso, A., Molinari, A., Schulz, A., &, Duarte, P. (2003). Performance indicators for wastewater services. London: International Water Association, ISBN: 1900222906.
27. McCullagh, P., &, Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6
28. McDonald, S., &, Zhao, J. (2001). Condition assessment and rehabilitation of large sewers. International conference on Underground Infrastructure Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, June 10-13, 2001, pp. 361-369.
29. Merrill, S., Lukas, A., Palmer, R. N., &, Hahn, M. A. (2004). Development of a tool to prioritize sewer inspections. Technical report, WERF-Water Environment Research Foundation-123).
30. Rahman, S., &, Vanier, D. J. (2004). MIIP client report: An evaluation of condition assessment protocols for sewer management. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
31. Salman, B. (2010). Infrastructure management and deterioration risk assessment of wastewater collection systems (Thesis PhD). University of Cincinnati, OH, USA.
32. Salman, B., &, Salem, O. (2012). Modeling failure of wastewater collection lines using various section-level regression models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18, 146-154. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000075
33. Saegrov, S. (Ed.). (2005). Computer aided rehabilitation for water networks. London: IWA, pp. 208.
34. Saegrov, S. (Ed.). (2006). CARE-S-computer aided rehabilitation for sewer and stormwater networks. London: IWA, ISBN: 1843391155.
35. Scheidegger, A., Hug, T., Rieckermann, J., &, Maurer, M. (2011). Network condition simulator for benchmarking sewer deterioration models. Water Research, 45, 4983-4994. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.008
36. Urich, C., Sitzenfrei, R., Möderl, M., &, Rauch, W. (2010). An agent-based approach for generating virtual sewer systems. Water Science & Technology, 62, 1090-1097. 10.2166/wst.2010.364
37. Van der Steen, A. J., Dirksen, J., &, Clemens, F. H. L. R. (2013). Visual sewer inspection: Detail of coding system versus data quality? Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, Published online: August 25, 2013. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2013.816974
38. Vasconcelos, E. (2005). Outils daide à la gestion du patrimoine réseau dassainissement non visitable Thèse de Doctorat de lUniversité Bordeaux 1.
39. Werey, C., Cherqui, F., Ibrahim, M., &, Gauffre, P. (2008). Sewer asset management tool: Dealing with experts opinions. In E. A. Cabrera, Jr. & M. A. Pardo. (Eds.), Performance assessment of urban infrastructure services. Drinking water, waste water and solid waste (pp. 125-134). London: IWA.
40. Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D. M., Iseley, T., &, Prasanth, R. K. (1998). Assessment technologies for sewer system rehabilitation. Automation in Construction, 7, 259-270. 10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00071-X