GIS-based applications of sensitivity analysis for sewer models

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1215-1222

  Mair, M ^a   Sitzenfrei, R ^b   Kleidorfer, M ^b   Moderl M ^b   Rauch, W ^b  

^a Hydro IT GmbH   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Capacity design; Combined sewer system; GIS applications; Model calibration; Uncertainty assessment; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY DESIGN; GIS APPLICATION; MODEL CALIBRATION; UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS;

CALIBRATION; COMBINED SEWERS; RATING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

CALIBRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; GIS; MAP; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEWER NETWORK; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION; VULNERABILITY;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; FLOODING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEWER; UNCERTAINTY; WATER POLLUTION;

CALIBRATION; DRAINAGE, SANITARY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84859722222     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.954     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., Bardin, J. P., Mourad, M. & Beranger, Y. 2003 Accounting for sensor calibration, data validation, measurement and sampling uncertainties in monitoring urban drainage systems. Water Science and Technology 47 (2), 95-102. (Pubitemid 36292223)
2. Brashear, J. & Stenzler, J. 2007 Water and Wastewater Specific RAMCAP Guidance. In Proceedings of the AWWA/WEF Joint Management Conference, Feb. 25-28, Portland, OR, USA.
3. Cimmery, V. 2010 User Guide for SAGA (Version 2.0.5).
4. De Toffol, S. 2006 Sewer system performance assessment-an indicators based methodology. Graduate Thesis, Unit of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
5. di Pierro, F., Khu, S. T. & Savic, D. 2006 From single-objective to multiple-objective multiple-rainfall events automatic calibration of urban storm water runoff models using genetic algorithms. Water Science and Technology 54 (6-7), 57-64. (Pubitemid 44755593)
6. Dotto, C. B. S., Kleidorfer, M., Deletic, A., Fletcher, T. D., McCarthy, D. T. & Rauch, W. 2010 Stormwater quality models: performance and sensitivity analysis. Water Science and Technology 62 (4), 837-843.
7. Dotto, C. B. S., Kleidorfer, M., Deletic, A., Rauch, W., McCarthy, D. T. & Fletcher, T. D. 2011 Performance and sensitivity analysis of stormwater models using a Bayesian approach and long-term high resolution data. Environmental Modelling and Software 26 (10), 1225-1239.
8. Ezell, B. C. 2007 Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (I-VAM). Risk Analysis 27 (3), 571-583. (Pubitemid 47063173)
9. Frey, H. C. & Patil, S. R. 2002 Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Analysis 22 (3), 553-578. (Pubitemid 34655123)
10. ISO Guide 1990 51 (1990) Guidelines for Inclusion of Safety Aspects in Standards. Beuth, Berlin.
11. James, W., El-Hosseiny, T. & Whiteley, H. R. 1998 On the optimization of uncertainty, complexity and cost for modeling combined sewer systems. In: Advances in Modeling the Management of Stormwater Impacts (W. James, ed.), Vol. 6. Computational Hydraulics International, Gulph, ISBN 0-9697422-8-2.
12. Kleidorfer, M. & Rauch, W. 2011 An application of Austrian legal requirements for CSO emissions. Water Science and Technology 64 (5), 1081-1088.
13. Kleidorfer, M., Deletic, A., Fletcher, T. D. & Rauch, W. 2009a Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters. Water Science and Technology 60 (6), 1545-1554.
14. Kleidorfer, M., Möderl, M., Fach, S. & Rauch, W. 2009b Optimization of measurement campaigns for calibration of a conceptual sewer model. Water Science and Technology 59 (8), 1523-1530.
15. Kleidorfer, M., Möderl, M., Sitzenfrei, R., Urich, C. & Rauch, W. 2009c A case independent approach on the impact of climate change effects on combined sewer system performance. Water Science and Technology 60 (6), 1555-1564.
16. Leitch, M. 2010 ISO 31000:2009 - the new international standard on risk management. Risk Analysis 30 (6), 887-892.
17. Möderl, M., Kleidorfer, M., Sitzenfrei, R. & Rauch, W. 2009 Identifying weak points of urban drainage systems by means of VulNetUD. Water Science and Technology 60 (10), 2507-2513.
18. Osuch-Pajdzinska, E. & Zawilski, M. 1998 Model of storm sewer discharge. II: Calibration and verification. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 124 (7), 600-611. (Pubitemid 28422674)
19. ÖWAV-RB 19 2007 Richtlinie für die Bemessung von Mischwasserentlastungen. Österreichischer Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaftsverband, Wien.
20. Rossman, L. A. 2004 Storm Water Management Model - User's Manual Version 5.0. National Risk Management Research Laboratory - US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
21. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S. & Campolongo, F. 2006 Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91 (10-11), 1109-1125.
22. Sitzenfrei, R., Mair, M., Möderl, M. & Rauch, W. 2011 Cascade vulnerability for risk analysis of water infrastructure. Water Science and Technology 64 (9), 1885-1891.
23. Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T. & Van Werkhoven, K. 2007 Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11 (2), 793-817. (Pubitemid 46204653)
24. UN DHA 1992 Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management. UN DHA (United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs).