Network condition simulator for benchmarking sewer deterioration models

Water Research

Volumn 45, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 4983-4994

  Scheidegger, A ^a   Hug, T ^a   Rieckermann, J ^a   Maurer, M ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Asset management; Deterioration model; Pipe condition inspection; Semi Markov chain; Sewerage

Indexed keywords

ASSET MANAGEMENT; EXPANSION; FREQUENCY ESTIMATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENTS; MARKOV PROCESSES; SEWERS;

AVERAGE LIFE EXPECTANCY; DATA MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; DETERIORATION MODELING; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; REHABILITATION PLANNING; SEMI-MARKOV CHAIN; SEWERAGE; TRANSITION PROBABILITIES;

DETERIORATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; DRAINAGE; ESTIMATION METHOD; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INSTALLATION; MARKOV CHAIN; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PIPE; POLICY MAKING; SEWER NETWORK; URBAN AREA;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NETWORK CONDITION SIMULATOR; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; REPLACEMENT POLICY; SEWER; SEWER DETERIORATION MODEL; SEWER NETWORK EXPANSION; SIMULATOR;

EID: 80052262776     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ana E.V., Bauwens W. Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: the state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water Journal 2010, 7(1):47-59.
2. Baik H.S., Jeong H.S., Abraham D.M. Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2006, 132(1):15-24.
3. Barbu V.S., Limnios N. Semi-Markov Chains and Hidden Semi-Markov Models Toward Applications 2008, Springer, New York.
4. Baur R., Herz R. Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types. Water Science and Technology 2002, 46(6-7):389-396.
5. Chughtai F., Zayed T. Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipelines. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2008, 22(5):333-341.
6. Clegg D., Eadon A.R., Fiddes D. UK state-of the-art - sewerage rehabilitation. Water Science and Technology 1989, 21(10-11):1101-1112.
7. Davies J.P., Clarke B.A., Whiter J.T., Cunningham R.J. Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes. Urban Water 2001, 3(1-2):73-89.
8. Davies J.P., Clarke B.A., Whiter J.T., Cunningham R.J., Leidi A. The structural condition of rigid sewer pipes: a statistical investigation. Urban Water 2001, 3(4):277-286.
9. Davies, J.P., Whiter, J.T., Clarke, B.A., Ockleston, G.O. and Cunningham, R.J., 1999. Application of interaction matrices to the problem of sewer collapse. In: Proceedings 11th European sewage and refuse symposium. Liquid wastes section, May 1999, Munich, Germany.
10. Delleur J.W. Sewerage failure, diagnosis and rehabilitation. URBAN Drainage Rehabilitation Programs and Techniques 1994, 11-28. ASCE, New York.
11. Dirksen J., Clemens F.H.L.R. Probabilistic modeling of sewer deterioration using inspection data. Water Science and Technology 2008, 57(10):1635-1641.
12. Dirksen, J., Goldina, A., ten Veldhuiz, J.A.E. and Clemens, F.H.L.R., 2007. The role of uncertainty in urban drainage decisions: uncertainty in inspection data and their impact on rehabilitation decisions. In: Proceedings IWA 2nd Leading Edge Conference on Strategic Asset Management, 17-19 October 2007, Lisbon, Portugal.
13. Djordjevic S., Prodanovic D., Maksimovic C., Ivetic M., Savic D. SIPSON - Simulation of interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks. Water Science and Technology 2005, 52(5):275-283.
14. Evans M., Hastings N., Peacock B. Statistical Distributions 2000, Wiley-Interscience, New York. third ed.
15. Hafskjold, L.S., Vanrenterghem-Raven, A., 2007. Experiences from the application of care-w, computer aided rehabilitation of water networks. In: Proceedings Combined International Conference of Computing and Control for the Water Industry, CCWI2007 and Sustainable Urban Water Management, SUWM2007, 3-5 September 2007, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
16. Hahn M.A., Palmer R.N., Merrill M.S., Lukas A.B. Expert system for prioritizing the inspection of sewers: knowledge base formulation and evaluation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2002, 128(2):121-129.
17. Harrell F.E. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis 2001, Springer, Berlin. first ed.
18. Herz R. Alterung und Erneuerung von Infrastrukturbeständen - Ein Kohortenüberlebensmodell (Aging and renewal of infrastructure - a cohort survival model). Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 1995, 14-15:5-29.
19. Herz R.K. Exploring rehabilitation needs and strategies for water distribution networks. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology AQUA 1998, 47(6):275-283.
20. Herz R.K., Lipkow A. Life cycle assessment of water mains and sewers. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 2002, 2(4):51-58.
21. Hörold, S., Baur, R., 1999. Modelling sewer deterioration for selective inspection planning - case study Dresden. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Junior Scientist Workshop, September 1999, Rathen, Germany.
22. Kathula, V.S., 2001. Structural distress condition modeling for sanitary sewers. Ph.D. thesis. Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, USA.
23. Kleiner Y. Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2001, 7(4):136-143.
24. Kleiner Y., Rajani B. Using limited data to assess future need. Journal American Water Works Association 1999, 91(7):47-61.
25. Kleiner Y., Rajani B. Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water 2001, 3(3):131-150.
26. Kleiner Y., Sadiq R., Rajani B. Modelling the deterioration of buried infrastructure as a fuzzy Markov process. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology AQUA 2006, 55(2):67-80.
27. Korving, 2004. Probabilistic assessment of the performance of combined sewer systems. Ph.D. thesis. TU Delft, The Netherlands.
28. Madanat S., Ibrahim W.H.W. Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1995, 121(3):267-272.
29. Madanat S., Mishalani R., Ibrahim W.H.W. Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 1995, 1(2):120-125.
30. Madanat S.M., Karlaftis M.G., McCarthy P.S. Probabilistic infrastructure deterioration models with panel data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 1997, 3(1):4-9.
31. Makropoulos C.K., Butler D., Maksimovic C. Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2003, 129(1):69-77.
32. Mauch M., Madanat S. Semiparametric hazard rate models of reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2001, 7(2):49-57.
33. Maurer M. Specific net present value: an improved method for assessing modularisation costs in water services with growing demand. Water Research 2009, 43(8):2121-2130.
34. Micevski T., Kuczera G., Coombes P. Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2002, 8(2):49-56.
35. Mishalani R.G., Madanat S.M. Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2002, 8(4):139-148.
36. Morcous G., Rivard H., Hanna A.M. Case-based reasoning system for modeling infrastructure deterioration. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 2002, 16(2):104-114.
37. Morcous G., Rivard H., Hanna A.M. Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2002, 8(3):86-95.
38. Müller, K., 2002. Entwicklung eines allgemein anwendbaren Verfahrens zur selektiven Erstinspektion von Abwasserkanälen und Anschlussleitungen. Teil A: Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen (Development of a generally applicable methodology for selective inspection of sewer networks. Part A: scientific studies). Final report of the Institute of Urban Water Management ISA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
39. Najafi, M., Kulandaivel, G., 2005. Pipeline condition prediction using neural network models. In: Proceedings ASCE Pipeline Division Specialty Conference - PIPELINES 2005, 21-24 August 2005, Houston, TX, USA.
40. Ross S.M. Stochastic Processes 1996, Wiley, New York. second ed.
41. Rutsch M., Rieckermann J., Cullmann J., Ellis J.B., Vollertsen J., Krebs P. Towards a better understanding of sewer exfiltration. Water Research 2008, 42(10-11):2385-2394.
42. Saegrov S., Melo Baptista J.F., Conroy P., Herz R.K., Legauffre P., Moss G., Oddevald J.E., Rajani B., Schiatti M. Rehabilitation of water networks: survey of research needs and on-going efforts. Urban Water 1999, 1(1):15-22.
43. Savic D.A., Giustolisi O., Laucelli D. Asset deterioration analysis using multi-utility data and multi-objective data mining. Journal of Hydroinformatics 2009, 11(3-4):211-224.
44. Schmitt T.G., Thomas M., Ettrich N. Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 299(3-4):300-311.
45. Tran, H.D., 2007. Investigation of deterioration models for stormwater pipe systems. Ph.D. thesis. Victoria University, Melburne, VIC, Australia.
46. Wirahadikusumah R., Abraham D., Iseley T. Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2001, 7(2):77-84.
47. Woodhouse J., Williams A., Dixon M., Male S., Davies R., Mustafa M., Bryan N., Jay P., Thompson A. PAS 55-1:2008 Asset Management. Part 1: Specification for the Optimized Management of Physical Assets 2008, The Woodhouse Partnership Ltd, Kingsclere, UK.
48. Sewer Rehabilitation Manual 1986, WRc, Water Research Centre Plc, UK. second ed.
49. Yan, J.M., Vairavamoorthy, K., 2003. Fuzzy approach for pipe condition assessment. In: Proceedings ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction: New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety, 13-16 June 2003, Baltimore, MD, USA.