Markov and neural network models for prediction of structural deterioration of storm-water pipe assets

Journal of Infrastructure Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 167-171

  Tran, H D ^a   Perera, B J C ^a   Ng, A W M ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Deterioration; Markov models; Neural networks; Probability; Storm water management; Structural failures

Indexed keywords

MARKOV MODEL; MARKOV MODELS; STORMWATERS; STRUCTURAL FAILURE; STRUCTURAL FAILURES;

ASSET MANAGEMENT; DETERIORATION; FORECASTING; FRACTURE MECHANICS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PIPE; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STORMS; STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PIPELINES; WATER PIPING SYSTEMS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; MARKOV CHAIN; MODELING; PIPE; PREDICTION; RAINFALL; RUNOFF; STORMWATER;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 77953974400     PISSN: 10760342     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000025     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baik H.S. Jeong H.S. Abraham D.M. Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2006, 132(1):15-24. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
2. Bishop C. Neural networks for pattern recognition 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Curry B. Morgan P.H. Model selection in neural networks: Some difficulties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 170(2):567-577. EJORDT, 0377-2217, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.026.
4. Australia infrastructure report card 2001, Engineers Australia, The Institution of Engineers Australia, Barton, Canberra, Australia.
5. Australian infrastructure report card 2005, Engineers Australia, The Institution of Engineers Australia, Barton, Canberra, Australia.
6. Kingston G.B. Maier H.R. Lambert M.F. A probabilistic method for assisting knowledge extraction from artificial neural networks used for hydrological prediction. Math. Comput. Modell. 2006, 44(5-6):499-512. MCMOEG, 0895-7177, 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.01.008.
7. Kuncheva I.L. Combining pattern classifiers: Methods and algorithms 2004, 10.1002/0471660264, Wiley, New York.
8. Leung F.H. F. Lam H.K. Ling S.H. Tam K.S. Tuning of the structure and parameters of a neural network using an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2003, 14(1):79-88. ITNNEP, 1045-9227, 10.1109/TNN.2002.804317
9. MacKay D.J. C. A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Comput. 1992, 4(3):448-472. NEUCEB, 0899-7667, 10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.448.
10. Micevski T. Kuczera G. Coombes P. Markov model for storm-water pipe deterioration. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2002, 8(2):49-56. JITSE4, 1076-0342, 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
11. Ross M.S. Simulation 1997, Academic, San Diego.
12. Tran D.H. Ng A.W. M. Mcmanus K.J. Burn S. Prediction models for serviceability deterioration of storm-water pipes. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2008, 4(4):287-295. ZZZZZZ, 1573-2479, 10.1080/15732470600792236, .
13. Tran D.H. Ng A.W. M. Perera B.J. C. Neural network deterioration models for serviceability condition of buried storm-water pipes. Eng. Applic. Artif. Intell. 2007, 20:1144-1151. EAAIE6, 0952-1976, 10.1016/j.engappai.2007.02.005.
14. Tran D.H. Perera B.J. C. Ng A.W. M. Comparison of structural deterioration models for storm-water drainage pipes. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2009, 24(2):145-156. CCIEFR, 1093-9687, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00577.x.
15. Wirahadikusumah R. Abraham M.D. Iseley T. Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2001, 7(2):77-84. JITSE4, 1076-0342, 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(77).
16. Sewer inspection reporting code of Australia 2002, WSAA, Water Service Association of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.