Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-59

  Ana, E V ^a   Bauwens, W ^b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BAÑOS   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Deterioration models; Pipe condition; Sewer; Statistical models; Urban drainage

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE NETWORK; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEWER NETWORK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; URBAN PLANNING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77249083347     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15730620903447597     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ariaratnam, S.T., 1994. The investigation of methods to assist decision-makers regarding bridge maintenance, repair and restoration activities. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
2. Ariaratnam, S.T., El-Assaly, A., and Tang, Y., 2001.Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (4), 160-165.
3. Baik, H.S., Jeong, H.S., and Abraham, D.M., 2006. Estimating transition probabilities in markov chainbased deterioration models for management of wastewater systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132 (1), 15-24.
4. Baur, R. and Herz, R., 2002. Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types. Water Science and Technology, 46 (6-7), 389-396.
5. Baur, R., Zielichowski-Haber, W., and Kropp, I., 2004. Statistical analysis of inspection data for the asset management of sewer networks. In: Proceedings 19th EJSW on Process Data and Integrated Urban Water Modeling, Lyon, France.
6. Bewick, V., Cheek, L., and Ball, J., 2005. Statistics review 14: Logistic regression. Critical Care, 9 (1), 112-118.
7. Butt, A.A., Feighan, K.J., Shahin, M.Y., and Carpenter, S., 1987. Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process. Transportation Research Record 1123. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
8. Chae, M.J., Iseley, T., and Abraham, D.M., 2003. Computerized sewer pipe condition assessment. In: Proceedings International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, Baltimore, MD.
9. Davies, J.P., Clarke, B.A., Whiter, J.T., and Cunningham, R.J., 2001a. Factors affecting the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes. Urban Water, 3, 73-89.
10. Davies, J.P., Clarke, B.A., Whiter, J.T., Cunningham, R.J., and Leide, A., 2001b. The structural condition of rigid sewer pipes: A statistical investigation. Urban Water, 3, 277-286.
11. Dayton, C.M., 1992. Logistic regression analysis. Stat 474-574, Articles and Links. http://bus.utk.edu/stat/Data-Mining/articles.htm (accessed 28 November 2007).
12. Dirksen, J., Goldina, A., ten Veldhuis, J.A.E., and Clemens, F.H.L.R., 2007. The role of uncertainty in urban drainage decisions: Uncertainty in inspection data and their impact on rehabilitation decisions. In: Proceedings IWA 2nd Leading-Edge Conference in Asset Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
13. El-Assaly, A., Ariaratnam, S.T., Ruwanpura, J., and Ng, H., 2006. Cost forecast model for sewer infrastructure. Municipal Engineer, 159 (3), 155-160.
14. Fenner, R.A., 2000. Approaches to sewer maintenance. Urban Water, 2, 343-356.
15. Hahn, M.A., Palmer, R.N., Merill, M.S., and Lukas, A., 2002. Expert system for prioritizing the inspection of sewers: Knowledge base formulation and evaluation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 128 (2),121-129.
16. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate data analysis. London: Prentice-Hall.
17. Harwood, D.W., St. John, A.D., and Bauer, K.M., 1982. Application of statistical techniques to gas operations. Chicago, IL: Gas Research Institution.
18. Herz, R.K., 1996. Aging processes and rehabilitation needs of drinking water distribution networks. Journal of Water, 45, 221-231.
19. Hoffman, F., Gao, X.Z., Olhofer, M., and Satyadas, A., 2005. Editorial. Journal of Applied Soft Computing, 5, 261-264.
20. Horold, S., 1998. Forecasting rehabilitation needs: Evaluation of the AQUA WertMin software for service life and total cost estimation. In: SINTEF Report, Trondheim, Norway.
21. Horold, S. and Baur, R., 1999. Modeling sewer deterioration for selective inspection planning - case study Dresden. In: Proceedings 13th EJSW on Service Life Management Strategies of Water Mains and Sewers, 8-12 September, Switzerland.
22. IIMM, 2006. International infrastructure management manual, 2006 edition. New Zealand: National Asset Management Steering (NAMS) Group.
23. Jansen, K., 2007. AQUA-WertMin program manual. Klienbittersdorf, Germany: Expert Office for Sewer Rehabilitation.
24. Jiang, Y., Saito, M., and Shinha, K.C., 1988. Bridge performance prediction model using Markov chain. Transportation Research Record 1180. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
25. Kleiner, Y., 2001. Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (4),136-143.
26. Kleiner, Y., Sadiq, R., and Rajani, B., 2006. Modelling the deterioration of buried infrastructure as a fuzzy Markov process. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology: Aqua, 55 (2), 67-80.
27. Kleiner, Y., Rajani, B., and Wang, S., 2007. Consideration of static and dynamic effects to plan water main renewal. In: Proceedings Middle East Water 2007, 4th International Exhibition and Conference for Water Technology, Manama, Bahrain.
28. Konig, A., 2005. CARE-S WP2 External corrosion model description. SINTEF Report. Trondheim. Norway: SIN- TEF Technology and Society.
29. Kulkarni, R.B., 1984. Dynamic decision model for a pavement management system. Transportation Research Record 997. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
30. Lawless, J.F., 1982. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
31. Le Gat, Y., 2008. Modelling the deterioration process of drainage pipelines. Urban Water, 5 (2), 97-106.
32. Lemer, A., 2000. Building public works infrastructure management systems for achieving high returns on public assets. Public Works Management & Policy, 3 (3), 255-272.
33. Madanat, S.M., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W.H.W., 1995. Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 1 (2), 120-125.
34. Makar, J.M., 1999. Diagnostic techniques for sewer systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5 (2), 69-78.
35. Mehle, J.J., O'Keefe, S.M., and Wrase, P.E., 2001. An examination of methods for condition rating of sewer pipelines. Center for Development of Technical Leadership, University of Minnesota.
36. Merill, M.S., Lukas, A., Palmer, R.N., and Hahn, M.A., 2004. Development of a tool to prioritize sewer inspections. Virginia, USA: Water Environmental Research Foundation.
37. Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P., 2002. Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure System, 8 (2), 49-56.
38. Muller, K. and Fischer, B., 2007. Objective condition assessment of sewer systems. In: Proceedings IWA 2nd Leading-Edge Conference in Asset Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
39. NEN3399, 1992. Sewerage systems outside buildings - Classification for visual inspection of sewers. The Netherlands: Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut.
40. Rajani, B. and Kleiner, Y., 2001. Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Physically-based models. Urban Water, 3, 151-164.
41. Ruwanpura, J., Ariaratnam, S., and El-Assaly, A., 2004. Prediction models for sewer infrastructure utilizing rulebased simulation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 21 (3), 169-185.
42. Ross, S.M., 2000. Introduction to probability models. 7th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Stone, S., Dzuray, E.J., Meisegeier, D., Dahlborg, A.S., and Erickson, M., 2002. Decision-support tools for predicting the performance of water distribution and wastewater collection systems. Ohio: US EPA.
44. Tran, D.H., 2007. Investigations of deterioration models for stormwater pipelines. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Architectural, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science, Victoria University.
45. Tran, D.H., Ng, A.W.M., Perera, B.J.C., and Davis, P., 2006. Application of probabilistic neural networks in modeling structural deterioration of stormwater pipes. Urban Water Journal, 3 (3), 175-184.
46. Tu, J.V., 1996. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logisitic regression for predicting medical outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49 (11), 1225-1231.
47. Vanier, D.J., 2001. Why industry needs asset management tools. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15 (1), 35-43.
48. Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D.M., Iseley, T., and Prasanth, R.K., 1998. Assessment technologies for sewer system rehabilitation. Automation in Construction, 7, 259-270.
49. Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D., and Iseley, T., 2001. Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (2), 77-84.
50. WRc, 2001. Sewer rehabilitation manual. 4th ed. UK: Water Research Council Publications.
51. Yang, J., 2004. Road crack condition performance modeling using recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of South Florida.