Growth and yield stimulation under elevated CO2and drought: A meta-analysis on crops

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 122, Issue , 2016, Pages 150-157

  van der Kooi, Casper J ^a,b   Reich, Martin ^b   Löw, Markus ^c   De Kok, Luit J ^a,b   Tausz, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomass; C3 C4metabolism; Free Air CO2enrichment; Global change; Moisture; Open top chamber; Soil moisture; Wheat

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; C3 PLANT; C4 PLANT; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CARBON FIXATION; CROP YIELD; DROUGHT STRESS; GLOBAL CHANGE; GRASS; META-ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PHYTOREMEDIATION; SOIL MOISTURE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; WHEAT;

POACEAE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84946429562     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.10.004     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. 2. New Phytol. 2005, 165:351-372.
2. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:258-270.
3. 2] impacts on crop yield and food supply. New Phytol. 2008, 179:5-9.
4. 4species of the genus Panicum (sl) with different metabolic subtypes to drought stress. Photosynthesis Res 2012, 112:175-191.
5. 2conditions. Plant Biol. 2015, 17:647-659.
6. 2increases water use efficiency by sustaining photosynthesis of water-limited maize and sorghum. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168:1909-1918.
7. 2levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1990, 167-196.
8. 2enrichment studies. Food Energy Secur. 2014, 3:33-45.
9. Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?. Crop Pasture Sci. 2005, 56:1159-1168.
10. 2. Ann. Rev. Pl. Biol. 1993, 44:309-332.
11. 2enrichment. Plant Biol. 2011, 13:258-269.
12. Campbell D., Kondra Z. Relationships among growth patterns, yield components and yield of rapeseed. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 1978, 58:87-93.
13. Cattivelli L., Rizza F., Badeck F., Mazzucotelli E., Mastrangelo A.M., Francia E., Mare C., Tondelli A., Stanca A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105:1-14.
14. Champolivier L., Merrien A. Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. var. oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality. Eur. J. Agron. 1996, 5:153-160.
15. Cure J.D., Acock B. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric. for. Meteorol. 1986, 38:127-145.
16. 2effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 1998, 113:299-313.
17. Daynard T., Tanner J., Duncan W. Duration of the grain filling period and its relation to grain yield in corn, Zea mays L. Crop Sci. 1971, 11:45-48.
18. Dias M., Brüggemann W. Water-use efficiency in Flaveria species under drought-stress conditions. Photosynthetica 2010, 48:469-473.
19. Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra S.M.A. Plant drought stress: effects: mechanisms and management. Agron. Sust. Dev. 2009, 29:153-188.
20. 3species. Planta 1980, 149(1):78-90.
21. Gebeyehou G., Knott D., Baker R. Relations hips among durations of vegetative and grain filling phases, yield components, and grain yield in durum wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 1982, 22:287-290.
22. Glass G.V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Edu. Res. 1976, 5:3-8.
23. Grantz D.A., Paudel R., Vu H.-B., Shrestha A., Grulke N. Diel trends in stomatal respone to ozone and water deficit: a unique relationship of midday values to growth and allometry in Pima cotton?. Plant Biol. 2015, In press. 10.1111/plb.12355.
24. Gupta N., Gupta S., Kumar A. Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages. J. Agron. Cr. Sci. 2001, 186:55-62.
25. 4photosynthesis: discovery and resolution. Photosynth. Res. 2002, 73:251-256.
26. Hawkesford M.J., Araus J., Park R., Calderini D., Miralles D., Shen T., Zhang J., Parry M.A. Prospects of doubling global wheat yields. Food Energy Secur. 2013, 2:34-48.
27. Hedges L.V., Gurevitch J., Curtis P.S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 1999, 80:1150-1156.
28. Higgins J., Green S., (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration.
29. 2enrichment experiment. Plant Biol. 2009, 11:60-69.
30. Hovenden M.J., Newton P.C., Wills K.E. Seasonal not annual rainfall determines grassland biomass response to carbon dioxide. Nature 2014, 511:583-586.
31. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
32. 2conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytol. 2002, 156:9-26.
33. Jenner C., Ugalde T., Aspinall D. The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Funct. Pl. Biol. 1991, 18:211-226.
34. 2in cereals. Adv. Agron. 2014, 127:111-156.
35. Kimball B.A. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron. J. 1983, 75:779-788.
36. Kirkham M.B., He H., Bolger T.P., Lawlor D.J., Kanemasu E.T. Leaf photosynthesis and water use of big bluestem under elevated carbon dioxide. Crop Sci. 1991, 31:1589-1594.
37. Kirkham M.B. Elevated Carbon Dioxide: Impacts on Soil and Plant Water Relations 2011, 416. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
38. Lawlor D.W. Limitation to photosynthesis in water-stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:871-885.
39. 2on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:807-818.
40. 2effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2859-2876.
41. 2concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:779-790.
42. 2. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92:41-52.
43. Li Y., Ye W., Wang M., Yan X. Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim. Res. 2009, 39:31.
44. Lobell D.B., Roberts M.J., Schlenker W., Braun N., Little B.B., Rejesus R.M., Hammer G.L. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest. Science 2014, 344:516-519.
45. 4crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3135-3153.
46. 2enrichment and drought stress on maize growth. Eur. J. Agron 2014, 52:11-21.
47. 2] in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3235-3246.
48. 2and drought. Plant Biol. 2015, 17:298-310.
49. 2. Oecologia 2004, 140:11-25.
50. 4grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature 2011, 476:202-205.
51. 2concentrations. I. Leaf area, water use and transpiration. Funct. Pl. Biol. 1984, 11:361-374.
52. Murphy K., Dawson J., Jones S. Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105:107-115.
53. Mutava R., Prasad P., Tuinstra M., Kofoid K., Yu J. Characterization of sorghum genotypes for traits related to drought tolerance. Field Crops Res. 2011, 123:10-18.
54. Nakagawa S., Cuthill I.C. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 2007, 82:591-605.
55. Nass H., Reiser B. Grain filling period and grain yield relationships in spring wheat. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 1975, 55:673-678.
56. 2increases soil moisture and enhances plant water relations in a long-term field study in semi-arid shortgrass steppe of Colorado. Plant Soil 2004, 259:169-179.
57. Nemani R.R., Keeling C.D., Hashimoto H., Jolly W.M., Piper S.C., Tucker C.J., Myneni R.B., Running S.W. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 2003, 300:1560-1563.
58. 2. Oecologia 1998, 117:201-208.
59. 2enrichment (FACE) experiments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 42:181.
60. 4plants. Plant. Cell Environ. 1984, 7:1-13.
61. Peterson P., Sheaffer C., Hall M. Drought effects on perennial forage legume yield and quality. Agron. J. 1992, 84:774-779.
62. 2?. Global Change Biol. 1998, 4:693-697.
63. 2concentration. Vegetatio 1993, 104:77-97.
64. 2: on winners: losers and functional groups. New Phytol. 2003, 157:175-198.
65. Core Team R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
66. Rampino P., Pataleo S., Gerardi C., Mita G., Perrotta C. Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:2143-2152.
67. 2on quantity and quality of yield in Chinese cabbage. Plant Biol. 2015, In press. 10.1111/plb.12396.
68. 2further lengthens growing season under warming conditions. Nature 2014, 510:259-262.
69. Sadras V.O. Does partial root-zone drying improve irrigation water productivity in the field? A meta-analysis. Irrig. Sci. 2009, 27:183-190.
70. 4photosynthesis: patterns and controlling factors. C4 Plant Biol. 1999, 313-373.
71. 2: effects of soil water status and genotype in wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 1995, 22:33-44.
72. Singh S., Singh G., Singh P., Singh N. Effect of water stress at different stages of grain development on the characteristics of starch and protein of different wheat varieties. Food Chem. 2008, 108:130-139.
73. Taeger S., Sparks T.H., Menzel A. Effects of temperature and drought manipulations on seedlings of Scots pine provenances. Plant Biol. 2015, 17:361-372.
74. 2world? A face study. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 148:232-245.
75. Tollenaar M., Lee E. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica 2006, 51:399.
76. 2: a review and suggestions for future research. Vegetatio 1993, 104:47-62.
77. Vandegeer R., Miller R.E., Bain M., Gleadow R.M., Cavagnaro T.R. Drought adversely affects tuber development and nutritional quality of the staple crop cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40:195-200.
78. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Software 2010, 36:1-48.
79. 2responses of grassland species. Oecologia 2000, 125:380-388.
80. 2improved Sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought. New Phytol. 2001, 152:231-248.
81. 2alleviates drought stress in wheat. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 87:261-271.
82. 2. Global Change Biol. 1999, 5:857-867.
83. Wujeska A., Bossinger G., Tausz M. Responses of foliar antioxidative and photoprotective defence systems of trees to drought: a meta-analysis. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33:1018-1029.
84. Wujeska-Klause A., Bossinger G., Tausz M. Seedlings of two Acacia species from contrasting habitats show different photoprotective and antioxidative responses to drought and heatwaves. Ann. For. Sci. 2015, 72:403-414.
85. 2-implications for water-limited environments. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:319-331.
86. Yoshida S. Physiological aspects of grain yield. Ann. Pl. Phys. 1972, 23:437-464.
87. Zelitch I. The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield. Bioscience 1982, 32:796-802.
88. Ziska L.H., Namuco O., Moya T., Quilang J. Growth and yield response of field-grown tropical rice to increasing carbon dioxide and air temperature. Agron. J. 1997, 89:45-53.