Will intra-specific differences in transpiration efficiency in wheat be maintained in a high CO2 world? A FACE study

Physiologia Plantarum

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 232-245

  Tausz Posch, Sabine ^a   Norton, Robert M ^a,b   Seneweera, Saman ^a   Fitzgerald, Glenn J ^c   Tausz, Michael ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b INTERNATIONAL PLANT NUTRITION INSTITUTE   (China)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; WATER;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DRUG EFFECT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; LIGHT; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL; WHEAT;

ACCLIMATIZATION; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; LIGHT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; TRITICUM; WATER;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84877719326     PISSN: 00319317     EISSN: 13993054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01701.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytol 165: 351-371
2. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ 30: 258-270
3. 2] experiments with crops: a critical investment for feeding the future world. Plant Cell Environ 31: 1317-1324
4. 2 in nodulated alfalfa plants. Environ Exp Bot 64: 295-306
5. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggens J (ed) Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress on Photosynthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 221-224
6. 2 - photosynthetic responses mediated through Rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14: 795-806
7. Bunce JA (2001) Direct and acclimatory responses of stomatal conductance to elevated carbon dioxide in four herbaceous crop species in the field. Glob Change Biol 7: 323-331
8. Bunce JA (2004) Carbon dioxide effects on stomatal responses to the environment and water use by crops under field conditions. Oecologia 140: 1-10
9. Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, Bhadwal S, Conde C, Mearns LO, O'Neill BC, Rounsevell MDA, Zurek MB (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133-171
10. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2002) Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci 42: 122-131
11. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55: 2447-2460
12. 2 enrichment in a wheat-weed assembly - effects on water relations. Basic Appl Ecol 10: 358-367
13. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use-efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 539-552
14. 3 species. Planta 149: 78-90
15. 3 plants under drought. Funct Plant Biol 29: 1209-1215
16. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Van Dorland R (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 131-217
17. 2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ 21: 659-669
18. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron-transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87-92
19. 2 levels increases photochemical efficiency and mitigates photochemistry inhibition by warm temperatures in wheat under field chambers. Physiol Plant 137: 86-100
20. 2 - the relationship between electron-transport and carbon metabolism. Planta 197: 482-489
21. Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, Thomson AM, Wolfe D (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103: 351-370
22. Hymus GJ, Ellsworth DS, Baker NR, Long SP (1999) Does free-air carbon dioxide enrichment affect photochemical energy use by evergreen trees in different seasons? A chlorophyll fluorescence study of mature loblolly pine. Plant Physiol 120: 1183-1191
23. 2 can both increase and decrease photochemistry and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in a predictable manner. Dactylis glomerata grown in two levels of nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiol 127: 1204-1211
24. 2 enrichment. Adv Agron 77: 293-368
25. Kirono DGC, Kent DM (2011) Assessment of rainfall and potential evaporation from global climate models and its implications for Australian regional drought projection. Int J Climatol 31: 1295-1308
26. 2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant Cell Environ 29: 1794-1800
27. 2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot 60: 2859-2876
28. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51: 659-668
29. 3 concentration on photosynthesis in spring wheat. Photosynth Res 45: 111-119
30. Medlyn B, Duursma RA, Eamus D, Ellsworth D, Prentice C, Barton CVM, Crous KY, De Angelis P, Freeman M, Wingate L (2011) Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob Change Biol 17: 2134-2144
31. 3 plants in response to progressive drought: Stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot London 89: 895-905
32. 2. Plant Physiol 140: 771-778
33. Mollah M, Norton R, Huzzey J (2009) Australian grains free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (AGFACE) facility: design and performance. Crop Pasture Sci 60: 697-707
34. 2. Plant Cell Environ 22: 567-582
35. 2 concentrations. 1. Leaf-area, water-use and transpiration. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 361-374
36. Mpelasoka F, Hennessy K, Jones R, Bates B (2008) Comparison of suitable drought indices for climate change impacts assessment over Australia towards resource management. Int J Climatol 28: 1283-1292
37. 2 enrichment (FACE). Plant Cell Environ 20: 1041-1050
38. Parsons R, Weyers JDB, Lawson T, Godber IM (1997) Rapid and straightforward estimates of photosynthetic characteristics using a portable gas exchange system. Photosynthetica 34: 265-279
39. Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (2002) Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield in rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci 42: 739-745
40. Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manage 80: 197-211
41. Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Watt M, Condon AGT, Spielmeyer W, Dolferus R (2010) Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Funct Plant Biol 37: 85-97
42. Semenov MA, Halford NG (2009) Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate. J Exp Bot 60: 2791-2804
43. 2 enrichment (FACE) depend on carbon and nitrogen relationship during ontogeny. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 945-953
44. Shewry PR (2009) Wheat. J Exp Bot 60: 1537-1553
45. 2 under fully open-air conditions. Plant Cell Environ 33: 322-331
46. 2 concentrations. Environ Exp Bot. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.005
47. 2? Field Crops Res 133: 160-166
48. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327: 818-821
49. Tubiello FN, Soussana J-F, Howden SM (2007) Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19686-19690
50. 2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 2. Net assimilation and stomatal conductance of leaves. Photosynth Res 66: 79-95
51. Wall GW, Garcia RL, Kimball BA, Hunsaker DJ, Pinter PJ, Long SP, Osborne CP, Hendrix DL, Wechsung F, Wechsung G, Leavitt SW, LaMorte RL, Idso SB (2006) Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and drought on wheat. Agron J 98: 354-381
52. Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424-426
53. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14: 415-421
54. Zhang H, Oweis TY, Garabet S, Pala M (1998) Water-use efficiency and transpiration efficiency of wheat under rain-fed conditions and supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean-type environment. Plant Soil 201: 295-305
55. Zhu X-G, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 235-261
56. Ziska LH (2008) Three-year field evaluation of early and late 20th century spring wheat cultivars to projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Field Crop Res 108: 54-59
57. Ziska LH, Morris CF, Goins EW (2004) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of selected wheat varieties released since 1903 to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: can yield sensitivity to carbon dioxide be a factor in wheat performance? Glob Change Biol 10: 1810-1819