Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 429-440

  Zuiderwijk, Anneke ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a   Dwivedi, Yogesh K ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Adoption; Open data; Open data technology; Open government data; Open public sector data; Use; UTAUT

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945571208     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Behkamal, B., Kahani, M., Bagheri, E., Jeremic, Z., A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of linked open data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:3 (2014), 64–79.
2. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Grimes, J.M., Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 27:3 (2010), 264–271.
3. Bertot, J.C., McDermott, P., Smith, T., Measurement of open government: metrics and process. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, U.S.A, Hawaii.
4. Bhattacherjee, A., Premkumar, G., Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly 28:2 (2004), 229–254.
5. Braunschweig, K., Eberius, J., Thiele, M., Lehner, W., OPEN — enabling non-expert users to extract, integrate, and analyze open data. Paper presented at the Datenbank-Spektrum. Zeitschrift für Datenbanktechnologien und Information Retrieval. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13222-012-0091-9/fulltext.html, 2012.
6. Conradie, P., Choenni, S., Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 2012, U.S.A, New York.
7. Conradie, P., Choenni, S., On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly 31:supplement 1 (2014), S10–S17, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003.
8. Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K.L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., Sweetser, K.D., Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review 36:1 (2010), 90–92.
9. Davies, T., Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from data.gov.uk. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/, 2010.
10. Davies, T.G., Bawa, Z.A., The promises and perils of Open Government Data (OGD). The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 2012 [n.p].
11. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13:3 (1989), 319–340.
12. Ding, L., Peristeras, V., Hausenblas, M., Linked open government data. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 27:3 (2012), 11–15, 10.1109/MIS.2012.56.
13. Duyck, P., Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Adang, L., Vercruysse, J., User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system. Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods of Information in Medicine 47:2 (2008), 149–156.
14. Field, A., Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2005, SAGE Publications, London.
15. Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., Turki, S., How open data are turned into services?. Snene, M., Leonard, M., (eds.) Exploring services science, 2014, Springer International Publishing, Geneva, 31–39.
16. Gascó, M., Special issue on open government: an introduction (published online before print). Social Science Computer Review, 2014, 10.1177/0894439314560676.
17. Gurstein, M., Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?. First Monday, 16(2), 2011 [n.p.].
18. Gwebu, K.L., Wang, J., Adoption of open source software: the role of social identification. Decision Support Systems 51:1 (2011), 220–229.
19. Huijboom, N., van den Broek, T., Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice 12:1 (2011), 4–16.
20. Hunnius, S., Krieger, B., Schuppan, T., Providing, guarding, shielding: Open Government Data in Spain and Germany. Paper presented at the European Group for Public Administration Annual Conference, Speyer, Germany, 2014.
21. Janssen, K., The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: an overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly 28:4 (2011), 446–456.
22. Jeffery, K., Asserson, A., Houssos, N., Brasse, V., Jörg, B., From open data to data-intensive science through CERIF. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Rome, Italy, 2014.
23. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjorn-Andersen, N., Data-driven innovation through open government data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:2 (2014), 100–120.
24. Johnson, M.P., Zheng, K., Padman, R., Modeling the longitudinality of user acceptance of technology with an evidence-adaptive clinical decision support system. Decision Support Systems 57:1 (2014), 444–453.
25. Juell-Skielse, G., Hjalmarsson, A., Johannesson, P., Rudmark, D., Is the public motivated to engage in open data innovation?. Paper presented at the 13th IFIP International Electronic Government Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 2014.
26. Jurisch, M.C., Kautz, M., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H., An international survey of the factors influencing the intention to use open government. Paper presented at the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, U.S.A., 2015.
27. Kaasenbrood, M., An exploration of the use of open government data by private organisations. Contributing to the improvement of governmental policies by examining the current use of open government data by private organisations in The Netherlands. Master thesis, 2013, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Delft.
28. Lancelot Miltgen, C., Popovič, A., Oliveira, T., Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems 56 (2013), 103–114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010.
29. Lee, J., Rao, H.R., Task complexity and different decision criteria for online service acceptance: a comparison of two e-government compliance service domains. Decision Support Systems 47:4 (2009), 424–435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.009.
30. Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Manley, L., Business models for open government data. Paper presented at the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 2014, Guimarães, Portugal.
31. Martin, C., Barriers to the open government data agenda: taking a multi-level perspective. Polymer International 6:3 (2014), 217–240, 10.1002/1944-2866.POI367.
32. McDermott, P., Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 27:4 (2010), 401–413.
33. Orlikowski, W.J., Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11:4 (2000), 404–428.
34. Parsons, M.A., Godøy, Ø., LeDrew, E., de Bruin, T.F., Danis, B., Tomlinson, S., Carlson, D., A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science. Journal of Information Science 37:6 (2011), 555–569.
35. Parycek, P., Sachs, M., Open government — information flow in web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice 9 (2010), 1–12.
36. Pattuelli, M.C., Personal name vocabularies as linked open data: a case study of jazz artist names. Journal of Information Science 38:6 (2012), 558–565.
37. Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., Psarras, J., A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:2 (2014), 34–47.
38. Rajabi, E., Sicilia, M.-A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., An empirical study on the evaluation of interlinking tools on the web of data. Journal of Information Science 40:5 (2014), 637–648.
39. Raman, B., The rhetoric and reality of transparency: transparent information, opaque city spaces and the empowerment question. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 2012 [n.p.].
40. Rana, N.P., Williams, M.D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, J., Theories and theoretical models for examining the adoption of e-government services. e-Service Journal 8:2 (2011), 26–55.
41. Shibl, R., Lawley, M., Debuse, J., Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Decision Support Systems 54:2 (2013), 953–961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.018.
42. Solar, M., Meijueiro, L., Daniels, F., A guide to implement open data in public agencies. Paper presented at the International Federation for Information Processing Electronic Government, Koblenz, Germany, 2013.
43. Sun, H., Zhang, P., The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64:2 (2006), 53–78.
44. Susha, I., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Grönlund, Å., Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption: usage, limitations, and lessons learned. Social Science Computer Review 33:5 (2015), 613–630.
45. Sykes, T.A., Venkatesh, V., Gosain, S., Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand employees' system use. MIS Quarterly 33:2 (2009), 371–393.
46. van Dijk, J.A.G.M., Peters, O., Ebbers, W., Explaining the acceptance and use of government internet services: a multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in The Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly 25:3 (2008), 379–399.
47. van Veenstra, A.F., van den Broek, T.A., Opening moves. Drivers, enablers and barriers of open data in a semi-public organization. Paper presented at the 12th Electronic Government Conference, Koblenz, Germany, 2013.
48. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27:3 (2003), 425–478.
49. Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79:1 (1999), 1–28.
50. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Chan, F.K.Y., Hu, P.J.-H., Brown, S.A., Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal 21:6 (2011), 527–555, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x.
51. Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X., Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U.S. Vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 13:1 (2010), 5–27.
52. Verma, N., Gupta, M.P., Open government data: more than eighty formats. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on E-Governance (ICEG 2012), Cochin, Kerala, India, 2012, 29–30 December.
53. Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-García, J.R., Janssen, M., Guest Editors' Introduction. Innovation through open data: a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:2 (2014), I–XIII, 10.4067/S0718-18762014000200001.