A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of linked open data

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 64-79

  Behkamal, Behshid ^a   Kahani, Mohsen ^a   Bagheri, Ebrahim ^b   Jeremic, Zoran ^b  

^a FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consistency; Correctness; Linked open data; Metrics; Quality assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901808752     PISSN: None     EISSN: 07181876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-18762014000200006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. E. Bagheri and D. Gasevic, Assessing the maintainability of software product line feature models using structural metrics, Software Quality Journal, vol. 19, pp. 579-612, 2011.
2. V. R. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. D. Rombach, The goal question metric approach, in Encyclopedia of software engineering, ed: John Wiley & Sons, 1994, pp. 528-532.
3. C. Batini and M. Scannapieca, Data quality: concepts, methodologies and techniques: Springer, 2006.
4. C. Batini, C. Cappiello, C. Francalanci, and A. Maurino, Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 41, p. 16, 2009.
5. F. Bauer and M. Kaltenböck, Linked Open Data: The Essentials, Edition mono/monochrom, Vienna, 2011.
6. B. Behkamal, M. Kahani, S. Paydar, M. Dadkhah, and E. Sekhavaty, Publishing Persian linked data; challenges and lessons learned, in Telecommunications (IST), 2010 5th International Symposium on, 2010, pp. 732-737.
7. C. Bizer, Quality Driven Information Filtering: In the Context of Web Based Information Systems: VDM Publishing, 2007.
8. C. Bizer and R. Cyganiak, Quality-driven information filtering using the WIQA policy framework, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 7, pp. 1-10, 2009.
9. M. Bobrowski, M. Marré, and D. Yankelevich, A software engineering view of data quality, Intl. Software Quality Week Europe (QWE'98), 1998.
10. M. Bobrowski, M. Marré, and D. Yankelevich, A Homogeneous Framework to Measure Data Quality, presented at the International Conference on Information Quality (IQ), Cambridge, MA, 1999.
11. L. C. Briand, S. Morasca, and V. R. Basili, Property-based software engineering measurement, Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 22, pp. 68-86, 1996.
12. S. Brüggemann and F. Grüning, Using ontologies providing domain knowledge for data quality management, in Networked Knowledge-Networked Media, ed: Springer, 2009, pp. 187-203.
13. N. E. Fenton and S. L. Pfleeger, Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach: PWS Publishing Co., 1998.
14. L. Finkelstein, Widely, strongly and weakly defined measurement, Measurement, vol. 34, pp. 39-48, 2003.
15. A. Flemming and O. Hartig. (April, 2014) URI Debugger. Linked Data Informatik. [Online]. Available: http://linkeddata.informatik.hu-berlin.de/uridbg
16. C. Fürber and M. Hepp, Using semantic web resources for data quality management, in Knowledge Engineering and Management by the Masses, ed: Springer, 2010, pp. 211-225.
17. C. Fürber and M. Hepp, SWIQA-A Semantic Web information quality assessment framework, 2011.
18. O. Hartig, Trustworthiness of data on the web, in Proceedings of the STI Berlin & CSW PhD Workshop, 2008.
19. O. Hartig and J. Zhao, Using Web Data Provenance for Quality Assessment, SWPM, vol. 526, 2009.
20. A. Hogan, A. Harth, A. Passant, S. Decker, and A. Polleres, Weaving the pedantic web, 2010.
21. ISO, ISO/IEC 25012- Software engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE), in Data quality model, ed, 2008.
22. Z. Jeremic (July 2013). The code of metrics calculation tool (1.0 ed.). Atlassian Bitbucket. [Online]. Available: https://bitbucket.org/behkamal/new-metrics-codes/src
23. Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang, AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment, Information & management, vol. 40, pp. 133-146, 2002.
24. Y. Lei, A. Nikolov, V. Uren, and E. Motta, Detecting Quality Problems in Semantic Metadata without the Presence of a Gold Standard, in 5th International EON Workshop at International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'07), Busan, Korea, 2007, pp. 51-60.
25. F. Naumann and C. Rolker, Assessment methods for information quality criteria, in 5'th Conference on Information Quality Cambridge, MA, 2000, pp. 148-162.
26. F. Naumann, U. Leser, and J. C. Freytag, Quality-driven integration of heterogeneous information systems, in 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'99), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 1999, pp. 447-458.
27. V. Peralta, Data freshness and data accuracy: A state of the art, Instituto de Computacion, Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay, Tech. Rep. TR0613, 2006.
28. L. L. Pipino, Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang, Data quality assessment, Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, pp. 211-218, 2002.
29. G. Poels and G. Dedene, Distance-based software measurement: necessary and sufficient properties for software measures, Information and Software Technology, vol. 42, pp. 35-46, 2000.
30. T. C. Redman and A. Blanton, Data quality for the information age: Artech House, Inc., 1997.
31. S. A. Sarcia, Is GQM+ Strategies really applicable as is to non-software development domains?, in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2010, p. 45.
32. K. Tolle. (April, 2014) The validating RDF parser (VRP) (3.0 ed.). Forth Institute of Computer Science. [Online]. Available: http://139.91.183.30:9090/RDF/VRP
33. P. Vassiliadis, Data warehouse modeling and quality issues, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens Athens, GREECE, 2000.
34. A. Zaveri, D. Kontokostas, M. A. Sherif, L. Bühmann, M. Morsey, S. Auer, et al., User-driven quality evaluation of dbpedia, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 2013, pp. 97-104.