Knowledge of Native Protein-Protein Interfaces is Sufficient to Construct Predictive Models for the Selection of Binding Candidates

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 55, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2242-2255

  Popov, Petr ^a,b,c,d   Grudinin, Sergei ^a,b,c  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c INRIA   (France)

^d MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;

BINDING AFFINITIES; NATIVE CONFORMATION; NEAR-NATIVE CONFORMATIONS; PROTEIN-PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; SOFTWARE PLATFORMS; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84945556509     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00372     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Moal, I. H.; Torchala, M.; Bates, P. A.; Fernández-Recio, J. The Scoring of Poses in Protein-Protein Docking: Current Capabilities and Future Directions BMC Bioinf. 2013, 14, 286 10.1186/1471-2105-14-286
2. Finkelstein, A.; Badretdinov, A.; Gutin, A. Why Do Protein Architectures Have Boltzmann-Like Statistics? Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1995, 23, 142-150 10.1002/prot.340230204
3. Tanaka, S.; Scheraga, H. A. Medium- and Long-Range Interaction Parameters between Amino Acids for Predicting Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins Macromolecules 1976, 9, 945-950 10.1021/ma60054a013
4. Miyazawa, S.; Jernigan, R. Estimation of Effective Interresidue Contact Energies from Protein Crystal Structures: Quasi-Chemical Approximation Macromolecules 1985, 18, 534-552 10.1021/ma00145a039
5. Sippl, M. Calculation of Conformational Ensembles from Potentials of Mean Force: an Approach to the Knowledge-Based Prediction of Local Structures in Globular Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 213, 859-883 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4
6. Sippl, M.; Ortner, M.; Jaritz, M.; Lackner, P.; Flöckner, H. Helmholtz Free Energies of Atom Pair Interactions in Proteins Folding Des. 1996, 1, 289-298 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00042-9
7. Koppensteiner, W.; Sippl, M. Knowledge-Based Potentials-Back to the Roots Biochemistry (Moscow) 1998, 63, 247-252
8. Thomas, P.; Dill, K. Statistical Potentials Extracted from Protein Structures: How Accurate Are They? J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 257, 457-469 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0175
9. Ben-Naim, A. Statistical Potentials Extracted from Protein Structures: Are These Meaningful Potentials? J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3698-3706 10.1063/1.474725
10. Liu, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y. A Physical Reference State Unifies the Structure-Derived Potential of Mean Force for Protein Folding and Binding Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2004, 56, 93-101 10.1002/prot.20019
11. Deng, H.; Jia, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, Y. What Is the Best Reference State for Designing Statistical Atomic Potentials in Protein Structure Prediction? Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2012, 80, 2311-2322 10.1002/prot.24121
12. Leelananda, S. P.; Feng, Y.; Gniewek, P.; Kloczkowski, A.; Jernigan, R. L. In Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling; Kolinski, A., Ed.; Springer: New York, 2011; pp 127-157.
13. Lu, H.; Skolnick, J. A Distance-Dependent Atomic Knowledge-Based Potential for Improved Protein Structure Selection Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2001, 44, 223-232 10.1002/prot.1087
14. Samudrala, R.; Moult, J. An All-Atom Distance-Dependent Conditional Probability Discriminatory Function for Protein Structure Prediction J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 275, 895-916 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479
15. Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y. Distance-Scaled, Finite Ideal-Gas Reference State Improves Structure-Derived Potentials of Mean Force for Structure Selection and Stability Prediction Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 2714-2726 10.1110/ps.0217002
16. Huang, S.-Y.; Zou, X. An Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Protein Recognition Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2008, 72, 557-579 10.1002/prot.21949
17. Chuang, G.-Y.; Kozakov, D.; Brenke, R.; Comeau, S. R.; Vajda, S. Dars (Decoys As The Reference State) Potentials for Protein-Protein Docking Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 4217-4227 10.1529/biophysj.108.135814
18. Maiorov, V. N.; Grippen, G. M. Contact Potential that Recognizes the Correct Folding of Globular Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 227, 876-888 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90228-C
19. Qiu, J.; Elber, R. Atomically Detailed Potentials to Recognize Native and Approximate Protein Structures Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2005, 61, 44-55 10.1002/prot.20585
20. Rajgaria, R.; McAllister, S.; Floudas, C. A Novel High Resolution Cα-Cα Distance Dependent Force Field Based on a High Quality Decoy Set Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2006, 65, 726-741 10.1002/prot.21149
21. Tobi, D.; Bahar, I. Optimal Design of Protein Docking Potentials: Efficiency and Limitations Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2006, 62, 970-981 10.1002/prot.20859
22. Ravikant, D.; Elber, R. PIE-Efficient Filters and Coarse Grained Potentials for Unbound Protein-Protein Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 400-419 10.1002/prot.22550
23. Chae, M.-H.; Krull, F.; Lorenzen, S.; Knapp, E.-W. Predicting Protein Complex Geometries with a Neural Network Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 1026-1039 10.1002/prot.22626
24. Mirzaei, H.; Beglov, D.; Paschalidis, I. C.; Vajda, S.; Vakili, P.; Kozakov, D. Rigid Body Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Molecular Docking J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 4374-4380 10.1021/ct300272j
25. Kohavi, R. A. Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Morgan Kaufman Publishers: San Francisco, 1995; Vol. 2, pp 1137-1145.
26. Derevyanko, G.; Grudinin, S. Convex-PP: Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions Using Polynomial Expansions and Convex Optimisation. Unpublished.
27. Boyd, S.; Vandenberghe, L. Convex Optimization; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2004.
28. Huang, S.-Y.; Yan, C.; Grinter, S. Z.; Chang, S.; Jiang, L.; Zou, X. Inclusion of the Orientational Entropic Effect and Low-Resolution Experimental Information for Protein-Protein Docking in Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2013, 81, 2183-2191 10.1002/prot.24435
29. Shen, M.-y.; Sali, A. Statistical Potential for Assessment and Prediction of Protein Structures Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 2507-2524 10.1110/ps.062416606
30. Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, Y. A Knowledge-Based Energy Function for Protein-Ligand, Protein-Protein, and Protein-DNA Complexes J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2325-2335 10.1021/jm049314d
31. Nelder, J. A.; Mead, R. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization Computer Journal 1965, 7, 308-313 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
32. Powell, M. J. An Efficient Method for Finding the Minimum of a Function of Several Variables Without Calculating Derivatives Computer Journal 1964, 7, 155-162 10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155
33. Wilson, E. B. Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra; Dover Publications: New York, 1955.
34. Brooks, B.; Karplus, M. Harmonic Dynamics of Proteins: Normal Modes and Fluctuations in Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1983, 80, 6571-6575 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6571
35. May, A.; Zacharias, M. Energy Minimization in Low-Frequency Normal Modes to Efficiently Allow for Global Flexibility During Systematic Protein-Protein Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2008, 70, 794-809 10.1002/prot.21579
36. Venkatraman, V.; Ritchie, D. W. Flexible Protein Docking Refinement Using Pose-Dependent Normal Mode Analysis Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2012, 80, 2262-2274 10.1002/prot.24115
37. Cavasotto, C. N.; Kovacs, J. A.; Abagyan, R. A. Representing Receptor Flexibility in Ligand Docking Through Relevant Normal Modes J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9632-9640 10.1021/ja042260c
38. Berman, H. M.; Battistuz, T.; Bhat, T. N.; Bluhm, W. F.; Bourne, P. E.; Burkhardt, K.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G. L.; Iype, L.; Jain, S.; Fagan, P.; Marvin, J.; Padilla, D.; Ravichandran, V.; Schneider, B.; Thanki, N.; Weissig, H.; Westbrook, J. D.; Zardecki, C. The Protein Data Bank Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2002, 58, 899-907 10.1107/S0907444902003451
39. Hinsen, K. The Molecular Modeling Toolkit: a New Approach to Molecular Simulations J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 79-85 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<79::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-B
40. Jorgensen, W. L.; Maxwell, D. S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225-11236 10.1021/ja9621760
41. Hinsen, K. Analysis of Domain Motions by Approximate Normal Mode Calculations Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1998, 33, 417-429 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<417::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-8
42. Hwang, H.; Vreven, T.; Janin, J.; Weng, Z. Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark Version 4.0 Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 3111-3114 10.1002/prot.22830
43. Pearson, W. R.; Lipman, D. J. Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Comparison Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988, 85, 2444-2448 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444
44. Ritchie, D. W.; Kozakov, D.; Vajda, S. Accelerating and Focusing Protein-Protein Docking Correlations Using Multi-Dimensional Rotational FFT Generating Functions Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1865-1873 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn334
45. Ritchie, D. W.; Venkatraman, V. Ultra-Fast FFT Protein Docking on Graphics Processors Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2398-2405 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq444
46. Popov, P.; Grudinin, S. Rapid Determination of RMSDs Corresponding to Macromolecular Rigid Body Motions J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 950-956 10.1002/jcc.23569
47. Hwang, H.; Pierce, B.; Mintseris, J.; Janin, J.; Weng, Z. Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark Version 3.0 Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2008, 73, 705-709 10.1002/prot.22106
48. Pierce, B. G.; Hourai, Y.; Weng, Z. Accelerating Protein Docking In ZDOCK Using an Advanced 3D Convolution Library PLoS One 2011, 6, e24657 10.1371/journal.pone.0024657
49. Méndez, R.; Leplae, R.; De Maria, L.; Wodak, S. J. Assessment of Blind Predictions of Protein-Protein Interactions: Current Status of Docking Methods Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2003, 52, 51-67 10.1002/prot.10393
50. Gray, J.; Moughon, S.; Wang, C.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Kuhlman, B.; Rohl, C.; Baker, D. Protein-Protein Docking with Simultaneous Optimization of Rigid-Body Displacement and Side-Chain Conformations J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 281-300 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00670-3
51. Chen, R.; Weng, Z. Docking Unbound Proteins Using Shape Complementarity, Desolvation, and Electrostatics Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2002, 47, 281-294 10.1002/prot.10092
52. Torchala, M.; Bates, P. A. Predicting the Structure of Protein-Protein Complexes Using the SwarmDock Web Server Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1137, 181-197 10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5-13
53. Moal, I. H.; Moretti, R.; Baker, D.; Fernández-Recio, J. Scoring Functions for Protein-Protein Interactions Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2013, 23, 862-867 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.017
54. Press, W. H. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3 rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2007.
55. Frauenfelder, H.; Sligar, S. G.; Wolynes, P. G. The Energy Landscapes and Motions of Proteins Science 1991, 254, 1598-1603 10.1126/science.1749933
56. Torchala, M.; Moal, I. H.; Chaleil, R. A.; Fernandez-Recio, J.; Bates, P. A. SwarmDock: a Server for Flexible Protein-Protein Docking Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 807-809 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt038
57. Vakser, I. A. Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome Biophys. J. 2014, 107, 1785-1793 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033
58. Kobe, B.; Guncar, G.; Buchholz, R.; Huber, T.; Maco, B.; Cowieson, N.; Martin, J. L.; Marfori, M.; Forwood, J. K. Crystallography and Protein-Protein Interactions: Biological Interfaces and Crystal Contacts Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2008, 36, 1438-1441 10.1042/BST0361438
59. Krissinel, E. Crystal Contacts as Nature's Docking Solutions J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 133-143 10.1002/jcc.21303
60. Janin, J.; Wodak, S. J.; Lensink, M. F.; Velankar, S. Assessing Structural Predictions of Protein-Protein Recognition: The CAPRI Experiment Rev. Comput. Chem. 2015, 28, 137-173 10.1002/9781118889886.ch4
61. Krivov, G. G.; Shapovalov, M. V.; Dunbrack, R. L. Improved Prediction of Protein Side-Chain Conformations with SCWRL4 Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2009, 77, 778-795 10.1002/prot.22488
62. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein Structure and Function Prediction Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7-8 10.1038/nmeth.3213
63. Moretti, R. et al. Community-Wide Evaluation of Methods for Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein-Protein Interactions Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2013, 81, 1980-1987 10.1002/prot.24356
64. Moult, J.; Fidelis, K.; Kryshtafovych, A.; Schwede, T.; Tramontano, A. Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP)-Round X Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2014, 82, 1-6 10.1002/prot.24452
65. Tirion, M. M. Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 1905 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1905
66. Bahar, I.; Atilgan, A. R.; Erman, B. Direct Evaluation of Thermal Fluctuations in Proteins Using a Single-Parameter Harmonic Potential Folding Des. 1997, 2, 173-81 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00024-2
67. Tama, F.; Gadea, F. X.; Marques, O.; Sanejouand, Y. H. Building-Block Approach for Determining Low-Frequency Normal Modes of Macromolecules Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2000, 41, 1-7 10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<1::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-P