Comparison and overview of PM2.5 source apportionment methods;PM2.5源解析方法的比较与评述

Kexue Tongbao/Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 109-121

  Zhang, Yanjun ^a   Zheng, Mei ^a   Cai, Jing ^a   Yan, Caiqing ^a   Hu, Yongtao ^b   Russell, Armistead G ^b   Wang, Xuesong ^a   Wang, Shuxiao ^c   Zhang, Yuanhang ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Method comparison; PM2.5; Receptor model; Source apportionment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945313166     PISSN: 0023074X     EISSN: 20959419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/N972014-00975     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. 2.5来源解析方法综述. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50: 1141-1154]
2. Tang X Y, Zhang Y H, Shao M. Atmospheric Environmental Chemistry (in Chinese). Beijing: Higher Education Press,2006[唐孝炎, 张远航, 邵敏. 大气环境化学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006]
3. Department of Science, Technology and standards, Ministry of Environmental Production, Nankai University, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, et al. Guidance for particulate matter source apportionment (in Chinese), 2013.8 [环境保护部科技标准司, 南开大学, 中国环境科学研究院, 等. 大气颗粒物来源解析技术指南, 2013.8]
4. Dong W X, Xing J, Wang S X. Temporal and spatial distribution of anthropogenic ammonia emissions in China: 1994-2006 (in Chinese). J Environ Sci, 2010, 31: 1457-1463 [董文煊, 邢佳, 王书肖. 1994~2006年中国人为源大气氨排放时空分布. 环境科学, 2010, 31: 1457-1463]
5. Wang L T, Zhang Q, Hao J M, et al. Anthropogenic CO emission inventory of Mainland China (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2005, 25: 1580-1585 [王丽涛, 张强, 郝吉明, 等. 中国大陆CO人为源排放清单. 环境科学学报, 2005, 25: 1580-1585]
6. Zhang Q, Klimont Z, Streets D G, et al. Emission model of anthropogenic particulate matter in China and application in 2001 (in Chinese). Prog Nat Sci, 2006, 16: 223-231 [张强, 霍红, 贺克斌. 中国人为源颗粒物排放模型及2001年排放清单估算. 自然科学进展, 2006, 16: 223-231]
7. Zhang C Y, Wang S X, Zhao Y, et al. Current status and future prospects of anthropogenic particulate matter emissions in China (in Chinese). J Environ Sci, 2009, 30: 1881-1887 [张楚莹, 王书肖, 赵瑜, 等. 中国人为源颗粒物排放现状与趋势分析. 环境科学, 2009, 30: 1881-1887]
8. Song X Y, Xie S D. Development of vehicular emission inventory in China (in Chinese). J Environ Sci, 2006, 27: 1041-1045 [宋翔宇, 谢绍东. 中国机动车排放清单的建立. 环境科学, 2006, 27: 1041-1045]
9. Cao G L, Zhang X Y, Gong S L, et al. Emission inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China (in Chinese). Chin Sci Bull (Chin Ver), 2011, 56: 261-268 [曹国良, 张小曳, 龚山陵, 等. 中国区域主要颗粒物及污染气体的排放源清单. 科学通报, 2011, 56: 261-268]
10. Dong Y Q, Chen C H, Huang C, et al. Anthropogenic emissions and distribution of ammonia over the Yangtze River Delta (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2009, 29: 1611-1617 [董艳强, 陈长虹, 黄成, 等. 长江三角洲地区人为源氨排放清单及分布特征. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29: 1611-1617]
11. Huang C, Chen C H, Li L, et al. Anthropogenic air pollutant emission characteristics in the Yangtze River Delta region, China (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2011, 31: 1858-1871 [黄成, 陈长虹, 李莉, 等. 长江三角洲地区人为源大气污染物排放特征研究. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31: 1858-1871]
12. Wu X L. The study of air pollution emission inventory in Yangtze Delta (in Chinese). Master Dissertation. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2009 [吴晓璐. 长三角地区大气污染物排放清单研究. 硕士学位论文. 上海: 复旦大学, 2009]
13. Zhao B. The research of air pollution source emission for the north China (in Chinese). Master Dissertation. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 2007 [赵斌. 华北地区大气污染源排放状况研究. 硕士学位论文. 北京: 中国气象科学研究院, 2007]
14. Zhang Y, Dore A, Ma L, et al. Agricultural ammonia emissions inventory and spatial distribution in the North China Plain. Environ Pollut, 2010, 158: 490-501
15. Zheng J, Zhang L, Che W, et al. A highly resolved temporal and spatial air pollutant emission inventory for the Pearl River Delta region, China and its uncertainty assessment. Atmos Environ, 2009, 43: 5112-5122
16. Zheng J, He M, Shen X, et al. High resolution of black carbon and organic carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta region, China. Sci Total Environ, 2012, 438: 189-200
17. Zhao B, Ma J Z. Development of an air pollutant emission inventory for Tianjin (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2008, 28: 368-375 [赵斌, 马建中. 天津市大气污染源排放清单的建立. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28: 368-375]
18. Wang H, Chen C, Huang C, et al. On-road vehicle emission inventory and its uncertainty analysis for Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 398: 60-67
19. Zhang Q, Xu J, Wang G, et al. Vehicle emission inventories projection based on dynamic emission factors: A case study of Hangzhou, China. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 4989-5002
20. Huo H, Zhang Q, He K, et al. High-resolution vehicular emission inventory using a link-based method: A case study of light-duty vehicles in Beijing. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 2394-2399
21. Liu H, He K, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of vehicle activity and emission inventory between Beijing and Shanghai. J Air Waste Manage, 2007, 57: 1172-1177
22. Burr M J, Zhang Y. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern U. S. Part I: Source Sensitivity Simulations Using CMAQ with the Brute Force Method. Atmos Pollut Res, 2011, 2: 300-31723
23. Koo B, Wilson G M, Morris R E, et al. Comparison of Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in a Particulate Matter Air Quality Model. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 6669-6675
24. 2.5 source contribution analysis in a photochemical model. Atmos Environ, 2013, 80: 398-407
25. Wang Z S, Chien C J, Tonnesen G S. Development of a tagged species source apportionment algorithm to characterize three-dimensional transport and transformation of precursors and secondary pollutants. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2009, 114: D21206
26. Burr M J, Zhang Y. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern U. S. Part II: Source Apportionment Simulations Using CAMx/PSAT and Comparisons with CMAQ Source Sensitivity Simulations. Atmos Pollut Res, 2011, 2: 318-336
27. Wang Z S, Li X Q, Wang Z S, et al. Application status of models-3/CMAQ in environmental management (in Chinese). Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 1: 386-391 [王占山, 李晓倩, 王宗爽, 等. 空气质量模型CMAQ的国内外研究现状. 环境科学与技术, 2013, 1: 386-391]
28. Byun D, Schere K L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl Mech Rev, 2006, 59: 51
29. Baek J. Improving aerosol simulations: Assessing and improving emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation in air quality modeling. Doctor Dissertation. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Tecnology, 2009
30. 10 source contributions in Las Vegas, Nevada. J Air Waste Manage, 1999, 49: 641-654
31. Baek J, Park S K, Hu Y, et al. Source apportionment of fine organic aerosol using CMAQ tracers. In: Proceedings of the Models-3 Use's workshop. North Carolina: Research Triangle Park, 2005.1-6
32. Dai S G, Zhu T, Bai Z P. Application and development of receptor models for the source apportionment of airborne particulate matter (in Chinese). China Environ Sci, 1995, 15: 252-257 [戴树桂, 朱坦. 受体模型在大气颗粒物源解析中的应用和进展. 中国环境科学, 1995, 15: 252-257]
33. Chen C G, Zhan X, Li N, et al. Composition analysis of airborne particles in Chongqing (in Chinese). Environ Chem, 2002, 21: 207-208 [陈昌国, 詹忻, 李纳, 等. 重庆市区大气颗粒物的物相组成分析. 环境化学, 2002, 21: 207-208]
34. Chen T H, Feng J H, Zhang Y, et al. Components of atmospheric particles in Hefei city and their environmental significance (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Et Mineral, 2001, 20: 433-436 [陈天虎, 冯军会, 张宇, 等. 合肥市大气颗粒物组成及其环境指示意义. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2001, 20: 433-436]
35. 10 source apportionment in California's San Joaquin Valley. Atmos Environ A Gen, 1992, 26: 3335-3354
36. Cooper J A, Watson Jr J G. Receptor oriented methods of air particulate source apportionment. J Air Pollut Control Assoc, 1980, 30: 1116-1125
37. 2.5 speciation data with incorporation of temperature stratification. Atmos Environ, 2013, 65: 11-20
38. Blifford Jr I H, Meeker G O. A factor analysis model of large scale pollution. Atmos Environ, 1967, 1: 147-157
39. Miller M, Friedlander S, Hidy G. A chemical element balance for the Pasadena aerosol. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1972, 39: 165-176
40. Watson J G, Cooper J A, Huntzicker J J. The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmos Environ, 1984, 18: 1347-1355
41. 2.5工业源谱的建立. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33: 1354-1359]
42. Paatero P, Tapper U. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 1993, 18: 183-194
43. 2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 1526-1537
44. 2.5 source apportionment using positive matrix factorization and molecular marker-based chemical mass balance. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 394: 290-302
45. Schauer J J, Rogge W F, Hildemann L M, et al. Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos Environ, 1996, 30: 3837-3855
46. 2.5 in the southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. Environ Sci Technol, 2002, 36: 2361-2371
47. Zheng M, Cass G R, Ke L, et al. Source apportionment of daily fine particulate matter at Jefferson street, Atlanta, GA, during summer and winter. J Air Waste Manage, 2007, 57: 228-242
48. Marmur A, Mulholland J A, Russell A G. Optimized variable source-profile approach for source apportionment. Atmos Environ, 2007, 41: 493-505
49. 2.5 in the southeastern United States using receptor and emissions-based models: Conceptual differences and implications for time-series health studies. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 2533-2551
50. Feng Y C, Bai Z P, Zhu T. The principle and application of improved-source-apportionment technique of atmospheric particulate matter (in Chinese). J Environ Sci, 2009, 23(Suppl): 106-108 [冯银厂, 白志鹏, 朱坦. 大气颗粒物二重源解析技术原理与应用. 环境科学, 2009, 23(增刊): 106-108]
51. Shi G L, Tian Y Z, Zhang Y F, et al. Estimation of the concentrations of primary and secondary organic carbon in ambient particulate matter: Application of the CMB-Iteration method. Atmos Environ, 2011, 45: 5692-5698
52. Shi G L, Feng Y C, Zeng F, et al. Use of a nonnegative constrained principal component regression chemical mass balance model to study the contributions of nearly collinear sources. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 8867-8873
53. Liu W, Wang Y, Russell A, et al. Enhanced source identification of southeast aerosols using temperature-resolved carbon fractions and gas phase components. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 445-466
54. Liu X S, Zhang E K, Cao J J, et al. Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols during spring of 2005 in Xi'an (in Chinese). Chin J Process Eng, 2006, 6: 5-9 [刘随心, 张二科, 曹军骥, 等. 西安2005年春季大气碳气溶胶的理化特征. 过程工程学报, 2006, 6: 5-9]
55. Bourotte C, Forti M C, Taniguchi S, et al. A wintertime study of PAHs in fine and coarse aerosols in São Paulo city, Brazil. Atmos Environ, 2005, 39: 3799-3811
56. Li C K, Kamens R M. The use of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as source signatures in receptor modeling. Atmos Environ A Gen, 1993, 27: 523-532
57. Simcik M F, Eisenreich S J, Lioy P J. Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan. Atmos Environ, 1999, 33: 5071-5079
58. Yunker M B, Macdonald R W, Vingarzan R, et al. PAHs in the Fraser River basin: A critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Org Geochem, 2002, 33: 489-515
59. Arimoto R, Duce R A, Savoie D L, et al. Trace elements in aerosol particles from Bermuda and Barbados: Concentrations, sources and relationships to aerosol sulfate. J Atmos Chem, 1992, 14: 439-457
60. Rahn K A. The Mn/V ratio as a tracer of large-scale sources of pollution aerosol for the Arctic. Atmos Environ, 1981, 15: 1457-1464
61. Han L H, Zhuang G S, Sun Y L, et al. Local and non-local sources of airborne particulate pollution at Beijing. Sci China Ser B Chem, 2005, 48: 253-264
62. Zheng M, Cheng Y, Zeng L, et al. Developing chemical signatures of particulate air pollution in the Pearl River Delta region, China. J Environ Sci, 2011, 23: 1143-1149
63. Bollhöfer A, Rosman K. Isotopic source signatures for atmospheric lead: The Northern Hemisphere. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2001, 65: 1727-1740
64. Hopper J, Ross H. Regional source discrimination of atmospheric aerosols in Europe using the isotopic composition of lead. Tellus B, 1991, 43: 45-60
65. Bollhöfer A, Rosman K. Isotopic source signatures for atmospheric lead: The Southern Hemisphere. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2000, 64: 3251-3262
66. Wang W, Liu X D, Zhao L W, et al. Assessment of the phase-out of leaded gasoline in Tianjin, China using isotope technique (in Chinese). China Environm Sci, 2003, 23: 627-630 [王婉, 刘咸德, 赵立蔚, 等. 用同位素方法评估天津市汽油无铅化进程. 中国环境科学, 2003, 23: 627-630]
67. 2.5 from North Birmingham, Alabama in the southeastern US. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 1422-1429
68. Zheng M, Ke L, Edgerton E S, et al. Spatial distribution of carbonaceous aerosol in the southeastern United States using molecular markers and carbon isotope data. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2006, 111: D10S06
69. Sheesley R J, Kruså M, Krecl P, et al. Source apportionment of elevated wintertime PAHs by compound-specific radiocarbon analysis. Atmos Chem Phys, 2009, 9: 3347-3356
70. 2.5 aerosols at nine Interagency Monitoring for Protection of Visual Environments (IMPROVE) network sites. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2007, 112: D10205
71. Song Y, Miao W J, Liu B, et al. Identifying anthropogenic and natural influences on extreme pollution of respirable suspended particulates in Beijing using backward trajectory analysis. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 154: 459-468
72. Chu D A, Kaufman Y J, Zibordi G, et al. Global monitoring of air pollution over land from the Earth Observing System-Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). J Geophys Res Atmos, 2003, 108: 4661
73. Dubovik O, Lapyonok T, Kaufman Y, et al. Retrieving global aerosol sources from satellites using inverse modeling. Atmos Chem Phys, 2008, 8: 209-250
74. 2.5 source apportionment approach for health studies. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 7023-7031
75. Hu Y, Balachandran S, Pachon J, et al. Fine particulate matter source apportionment using a hybrid chemical transport and receptor model approach. Atmos Chem Phys, 2014, 14: 5415-5431
76. Shi G L, Li X, Feng Y C, et al. Combined source apportionment, using positive matrix factorization-chemical mass balance and principal component analysis/multiple linear regression-chemical mass balance models. Atmos Environ, 2009, 43: 2929-2937
77. Hansen D A, Edgerton E S, Hartsell B E, et al. The southeastern aerosol research and characterization study: Part 1-Overview. J Air Waste Manage, 2003, 53: 1460-1471
78. Liu W, Wang Y, Russell A, et al. Atmospheric aerosol over two urban-rural pairs in the southeastern United States: Chemical composition and possible sources. Atmos Environ, 2005, 39: 4453-4470
79. 2.5 in Atlanta, Georgia: On-road emission, biomass combustion and SOA impact. Doctor Dissertation. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009
80. Balachandran S, Pachon J E, Hu Y, et al. Ensemble-trained source apportionment of fine particulate matter and method uncertainty analysis. Atmos Environ, 2012, 61: 387-394
81. Sawyer R F, Harley R A, Cadle S, et al. Mobile sources critical review: 1998 NARSTO assessment. Atmos Environ, 2000, 34: 2161-2181
82. Li J D. Chemical compositions and source apportionment of inhalable particulate matter at suburban area of Changsha (in Chinese). Master Dissertation. Changsha: Central South University, 2009 [李剑东. 长沙市郊区大气可吸入颗粒物化学组分特性及源解析. 硕士学位论文. 长沙: 中南大学, 2009]
83. Wang C F, Chang C Y, Tsai S F, et al. Characteristics of road dust from different sampling sites in northern Taiwan. J Air Waste Manage, 2005, 55: 1236-1244
84. Duvall R, Majestic B, Shafer M, et al. The water-soluble fraction of carbon, sulfur, and crustal elements in Asian aerosols and Asian soils. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 5872-5884
85. Drewnick F, Hings S S, Curtius J, et al. Measurement of fine particulate and gas-phase species during the New Year's fireworks 2005 in Mainz, Germany. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 4316-4327
86. Wang Y, Zhuang G, Xu C, et al. The air pollution caused by the burning of fireworks during the lantern festival in Beijing. Atmos Environ, 2007, 41: 417-431
87. Appel K, Pouliot G, Simon H, et al. Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0. Geosci Model Dev Discuss, 2013, 6: 883-899
88. Watson J G, Chow J C. Reconciling urban fugitive dust emissions inventory and ambient source contribution estimates: Summary of current knowledge and needed research. DRI Document No. 6110.4F, 2000.240
89. Rizzo M J, Scheff P A. Fine particulate source apportionment using data from the USEPA speciation trends network in Chicago, Illinois: Comparison of two source apportionment models. Atmos Environ, 2007, 41: 6276-6288
90. 2.5: Comparing PMF and CMB results for four ambient monitoring sites in the southeastern United States. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 4126-4137
91. 5: A review. Aerosol Sci Technol, 2011, 45: 665-695
92. 2.5 in Pittsburgh using PMF and UNMIX. Aerosol Sci Technol, 2006, 40: 910-924
93. Carlton A G, Bhave P V, Napelenok S L, et al. Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQ v4.7. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 8553-8560
94. Baek J, Hu Y, Odman M T, et al. Modeling secondary organic aerosol in CMAQ using multigenerational oxidation of semi-volatile organic compounds. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2011, 116: D22204