Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern U.S. Part II: Source apportionment simulations using CAMx/PSAT and comparisons with CMAQ source sensitivity simulations

Atmospheric Pollution Research

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-336

  Burr, Michael J ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apportionment technology; Brute Force source sensitivity; CAMx; CMAQ; Method; Particulate source; Southeastern U.S

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877056275     PISSN: 13091042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5094/APR.2011.037     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ansari, A.S., Pandis, S.N., 1998. Response of inorganic PM to precursor concentrations. Environmental Science and Technology 32, 2706-2714.
2. Baek, J., Park, S.K., Hu, Y., Russell A.G., 2005. Source apportionment of fine organic aerosol using CMAQ Tracers. Proceedings of the Models-3 User's Workshop, July 27, 2005. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
3. Bhave, P.V., Pouliot, G.A., Zheng, M., 2007. Diagnostic model evaluation for carbonaceous PM2.5 using organic markers measured in the southeastern US. Environmental Science and Technology 41, 1577-1583.
4. Burr, M., Zhang, Y., 2011. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern U.S. Part I: source sensitivity simulations using CMAQ with the Brute Force method. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2, 299-316.
5. Byun, D., Schere, K.L., 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Reviews 59, 51-77.
6. Cohan, D.S., Hakami, A., Hu, Y.T., Russell, A.G., 2005. Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis. Environmental Science and Technology 39, 6739-6748.
7. Dunker, A.M., Yarwood, G., Ortmann, J.P., Wilson, G.M., 2002. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a threedimensional air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology 36, 2953-2964.
8. ENVIRON, 2009. Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx), Version 5.10. User's Guide, ENIRON International Corporation, Navato, CA, available at: http://www.camx.com.
9. Ke, L., Liu, W., Wang, Y., Russell, A.G., Edgerton, E.S., Zheng M., 2008. Comparison of PM2.5 source apportionment using positive matrix factorization and molecular marker-based chemical mass balance. Science of the Total Environment 394, 290-302.
10. Koo, B., Wilson, G.M., Morris, R.E., Dunker, A.M., Yarwood, G., 2009. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology 43, 6669-6675.
11. Lee, D., Balachandran, S., Pachon, J., Shankaran, R., Lee, S., Mulholland, J.A., Russell, A.G., 2009. Ensemble-trained PM2.5 source apportionment approach for health studies. Environmental Science and Technology 43, 7023-7031.
12. Morris, R.E., Koo, B., Guenther, A., Yarwood, G., McNally, D., Tesche, T.W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J., Brewer, P., 2006. Model sensitivity evaluation for organic carbon using two multi-pollutant air quality models that simulate regional haze in the southeastern United States. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4960-4972.
13. Napelenok, S.L., Carlton A.G., Bhave, P.V., Sarwar, G., Pouliot, G., Pinder, R. W., Edney, E. O., Houyoux, M., Foley K.M., 2008. Updates to the treatment of secondary organic aerosol treatment in CMAQv4.7, Proceedings of the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, 6-8 October 2008 Chapel Hill N.C.
14. Olsen, K., 2009. Fine Scale Modeling of Agricultural Air Quality Over The Southeastern United Staets: ApplicationaAnd Evaluation of Two Air Quality Models. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
15. Pun, B.K., Seigneur, C., Bailey, E.M., Gautney, L.L., Douglas, S.G., Haney, J.L., Kumar, N., 2008. Response of atmospheric particulate matter to changes in precursor emissions: a comparison of three air quality models. Environmental Science and Technology 42, 831-837.
16. Wesley, M.L., 1989. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional scale numerical models. Atmospheric Environment 23, 1293-1304.
17. Zhang, Y., Wen, X.Y., Wang, K., Vijayaraghavan, K., Jacobson, M.Z., 2009. Probing into regional O3 and particulate matter pollution in the United States Part II. an examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis technique and sensitivity study. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 114, art. no. D22305.
18. Zhang, Y., Huang, J.P., Henze, D.K., Seinfeld, J.H., 2007. Role of isoprene in secondary organic aerosol formation on a regional scale. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 112, art. no. D20207.
19. Zhang, Y., Liu, P., Queen, A., Misenis, C., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., Wu, S.Y., 2006. A comprehensive performance evaluation of MM5-CMAQ for the Summer 1999 Southern Oxidants Study episode, Part II. gas and aerosol predictions. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4839-4855.
20. Zhang, Y., Vijayaraghavan, K., Seigneur, C., 2005. Evaluation of three probing techniques in a three-dimensional air quality model. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 110, art. no. D02305.
21. Zheng, M., Ke, L., Edgerton, E.S., Schauer, J.J., Dong, M.Y., Russell, A.G., 2006. Spatial distribution of carbonaceous aerosol in the southeastern United States using molecular markers and carbon isotope data. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 111, art. no. D10S06.
22. Zheng, M., Cass, G.R., Schauer, J.J., Edgerton, E.S., 2002. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. Environmental Science and Technology 36, 2361-2371.