Combined source apportionment, using positive matrix factorization-chemical mass balance and principal component analysis/multiple linear regression-chemical mass balance models

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 2929-2937

  Shi, Guo Liang ^a   Li, Xiang ^a   Feng, Yin Chang ^a   Wang, Yu Qiu ^a   Wu, Jian Hui ^a   Li, Jun ^b   Zhu, Tan ^a  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Zhengzhou Monitoring Center   (China)

Author keywords

Combined source apportionment; Original receptor; Secondary receptor

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE MODELS; CHEMICAL MASS BALANCES; COLLINEARITY; COMBINED MODELS; COMBINED SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; DATA SETS; ORIGINAL RECEPTOR; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; RECEPTOR MODELS; SECONDARY RECEPTOR; SOURCE PROFILES;

FACTORIZATION; LIGHT MEASUREMENT;

COAL COMBUSTION;

AMBIENT AIR; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; COAL; COMBUSTION; DATA SET; MASS BALANCE; POLLUTANT SOURCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHINA; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X RAY FLUORESCENCE;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

EID: 67349256813     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.054     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baldwin D.P., Zamzow D.S., and D'Silva A.P. Aerosol mass measurement and solution standard additions for quantization in laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 66 (1994) 1911-1917
2. 10 in six cities of northern China. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 903-912
3. 2.5 exposure data. Environmental Science and Technology 40 (2006) 1892-1901
4. Carvalho L.R.F., Souza S.R., Martinis B.S., and Korn M. Monitoring of the ultrasonic irradiation effect on the extraction of airborne particle matter by ion chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta 317 1-3 (1995) 171-179
5. 10 aerosols in Brisbane (Australia) by receptor modeling. Atmospheric Environment 33 (1999) 3251-3268
6. Chow J.C., and Watson J.G. Ion chromatography in elemental analysis of airborne particles. In: Landsberger S., and Creatchman M. (Eds). Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles (1999), Gordon and Breach, Newark, NJ 539-573
7. 10 apportionment for fossil fuel combustion and other sources by the chemical mass balance receptor model. Energy and Fuels 16 (2002) 222-260
8. Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Kuhns H., Etyemezian V., Lowenthal D.H., Crow D., Kohl S.D., Engelbrecht J.P., and Green M.C. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational Study. Chemosphere 54 (2004) 185-208
9. Christensen W.F. Chemical mass balance analysis of air quality data when unknown pollution sources are present. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 4305-4317
10. Crawford J., Chambers S., Cohen D.D., Dyer L., Wang T., and Zahorowski W. Receptor modeling using positive matrix factorisation, back trajectories and radon-222. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 6823-6837
11. Guo H., Wang T., Simpson I.J., Blake D.R., Yu X.M., Kwok Y.H., and Li Y.S. Source contributions to ambient VOCs and CO at a rural site in eastern China. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 4551-4560
12. Harrison R.M., Smith D.J.T., and Luhana L. Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, U.K. Environmental Science and Technology 30 (1996) 825-832
13. 10 and arsenic concentrations in Central Chile using positive matrix factorization. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 549-561
14. Henry R.C. Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 65 (2003) 179-189
15. Hopke, P.K., 1985a. Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, p. 132.
16. Hopke, P.K., 1985b. Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, p. 158.
17. Hopke P.K. A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in Metropolitan Boston. Atmospheric Environment 19 (2003) 9-25
18. Hopke P.K. Recent developments in receptor modeling. Journal of Chemometrics 17 (2003) 255-265
19. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Larson T.V., and Covert D.S. Analysis of ambient particle size distributions using Unmix and positive matrix factorization. Environmental Science and Technology 38 (2004) 202-209
20. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Pinto J.P., and Wilson W.E. Spatial variability of fine particle mass, components and source contributions during the regional air pollution study in St. Louis. Environmental Science and Technology 39 (2005) 4173-4179
21. Li Z., Hopke P.K., Husain L., Qureshi S., Dutkiewicz V.A., Schwab J.J., Drewnick F., and Demerjian K.L. Sources of fine particle composition in New York city. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 6521-6529
22. Lowenthal D.H., Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Neuroth G.R., Robbins R.B., Shafritz B.P., and Countess R.J. The effects of collinearity on the ability to determine aerosol contributions from diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles using the chemical mass balance model. Atmospheric Environment 26A (1992) 2341-2351
23. 10 and sulfate aerosol at McMurdo station, Antarctica. Chemosphere 45 (2001) 347-356
24. 2.5 at an urban improve site in Seattle, Washington. Environmental Science and Technology 37 (2003) 5135-5142
25. Otto M. Chemometrics: Statistics and Computer Application in Analytical Chemistry (1999), Willey-VCH
26. Paatero P. Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 37 (1997) 23-35
27. 10 in an industrialized urban area of Northern Greece. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 41-54
28. Schwartz J., Dockery D.W., and Neas L.M. Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 46 (1996) 927-939
29. Seigneur, C., Louis, J.F., Hopke, P.K., Grosjean, D., 1997. Review of Air Quality Models for Particulate Matter. Document Number CP015-97-1b.
30. Thurston G.D., and Spengler J.D. A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in Metropolitan Boston. Atmospheric Environment 19 (1985) 9-25
31. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA PMF 1.1 User's Guide (2005), National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
32. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA CMB8 User's Manual (2005), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
33. Watson J.G., Chow J.C., and Frazier C.A. X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air samples. In: Landsberger S., and Creatchman M. (Eds). Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles (1999), Gordon and Breach, Newark, NJ 67-96
34. Watson J.G., Zhu T., Chow J.C., Engelbrecht J., Fujita E.M., and Wilson W.E. Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment. Chemosphere 49 (2002) 1093-1136
35. Watson J.G., Chen L.W.A., Chow J.C., Doraiswamy P., and Lowenthal D.H. Source apportionment: findings from the U.S. supersites program. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 58 (2008) 265-288
36. Xu S., Liu W., and Tao S. Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in China. Environmental Science and Technology 40 (2006) 702-708
37. 10 sources over Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 1803-1815
38. Zhao P.S., Feng Y.C., Zhu T., and Wu J.H. Characterizations of resuspended dust in six cities of North China. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 5807-5814