Establishing PM2.5 industrial source profiles in Shanghai

Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1354-1359

  Zheng, Mei ^a   Zhang, Yan Jun ^a   Yan, Cai Qing ^a   Fu, Huai Yu ^a   Niu, Hong Ya ^a   Huang, Kun ^a   Hu, Min ^a   Zeng, Li Min ^a   Liu, Qi Zhen ^b   Pei, Bing ^b   Fu, Qing Yan ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shanghai Environmental Monitoring Center   (China)

Author keywords

Industrial source profile; PM2.5; Shanghai

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SPECIES; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; INDUSTRIAL PROCESSS; INDUSTRIAL SOURCES; SHANGHAI; SMELTING FURNACES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; VEHICULAR EMISSION;

CALCIUM; COAL COMBUSTION; METALLURGICAL FURNACES; POWER PLANTS; SINTERING;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84883479693     PISSN: 10006923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2012, 32 (80): 1409-1415.
2. Tan J H, Duan J C, Chen D H, et al. Chemical characteristics of haze during summer and winter in Guangzhou [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2009, 94 (2): 238-245.
3. Yadav A K, Kumar K, Kasim A M H A, et al. Visibility and incidence of respiratory diseases during the 1998haze episode in Brunei Darussalam [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2003, 160 (1): 265-277.
4. 10 in haze-fog episodes in Beijing [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40 (10): 3148-3155.
5. Chow J C, Watson J G, Kuhns H, et al. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study [J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 54 (2): 185-208.
6. 2006, 18 (5): 1-5.
7. 2009, 29 (11): 1202-1208.
8. 2.5 during a three-year sampling period in Beijing, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2011, 13 (2): 334-346.
9. 2010.
10. Zheng M, Wang F, Hagler G, et al. Sources of excess urban carbonaceous aerosol in the Pearl River Delta Region, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45 (5): 1175-1182.
11. 2006.
12. 2.5 in Beijing using principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores and UNMIX [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 372 (1): 278-286.
13. 2.5 in the Beijing area [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52 (5): 608-615.
14. Guo H, Ding A, So K, et al. Receptor modeling of source apportionment of Hong Kong aerosols and the implication of urban and regional contribution [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43 (6): 1159-1169.
15. Wang Q, Shao M, Zhang Y, et al. Source apportionment of fine organic aerosols in Beijing [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9: 8573-8585.
16. 2008.
17. 2.5 in urban area of Hong Kong [J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2006, 138 (1): 73-85.
18. 2.5 in Beijing in 2004 [J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2007, 146 (1): 124-130.
19. 2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40 (8): 1526-1537.
20. Zheng M, Hagler G S, Ke L, et al. Composition and sources of carbonaceous aerosols at three contrasting sites in Hong Kong [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2006, 111 (D20313), doi:10.1029/2006JD007074.
21. 2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39 (22): 3967-3976.
22. 2007, 11 (6): 713-722.
23. 2010, 33 (2): 131-134.
24. 2009, 29 (2): 243-251.
25. 2005.
26. He L Y, Hu M, Zhang Y H, et al. Fine particle emissions from on-road vehicles in the Zhujiang tunnel, China [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42 (12): 4461-4466.
27. 2007, 23 (2): 58-61.
28. 2012, 25 (5): 549-555.
29. 2004.
30. 2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995 [J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 43 (8): 1141-1151.