The HAAPI (Home Arm Assistance Progression Initiative) Trial: A Novel Robotics Delivery Approach in Stroke Rehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 958-968

  Wolf, Steven L ^a,b   Sahu, Komal ^a   Bay, R Curtis ^c   Buchanan, Sharon ^d   Reiss, Aimee ^a   Linder, Susan ^e   Rosenfeldt, Anson ^e   Alberts, Jay ^e,f  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Virginia G Piper Cancer Center   (United States)

^e LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

hemiparesis; robotics; stroke; telerehabilitation; therapy; upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPARESIS; HOME CARE; HOME EXERCISE PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED; MOTOR FUNCTION TEST; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RANKIN SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; REMOTE SENSING; ROBOTICS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE PATIENT; TELEMONITORING; WEIGHT BEARING; AGE; AGED; ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE REHABILITATION; TELEREHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TELEREHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84945137414     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968315575612     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014; 129: e28-e292.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ,. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2181-2186.
3. Dobkin BH,. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1677-1684.
4. Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, et al. Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013; 44: 2361-2375.
5. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009; 119: 480-486.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outpatient rehabilitation among stroke survivors-21 States and the District of Columbia, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007; 56 (20): 504-507.
7. Skolarus LE, Meurer WJ, Burke JF, Prvu Bettger J, Lisabeth LD,. Effect of insurance status on postacute care among working age stroke survivors. Neurology. 2012; 78: 1590-1595.
8. Higashida R, Alberts MJ, Alexander DN, et al. Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013; 44: 2961-2984.
9. Liao Y, Bang D, Cosgrove S, et al. Surveillance of health status in minority communities: Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) Risk Factor Survey, United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011; 60: 1-44.
10. Bettger JP, Zhao X, Bushnell C, et al. The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stroke: findings from the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) registry. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 281.
11. Albright KC, Branas CC, Meyer BC, et al. ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems. Arch Neurol. 2010; 67: 1210-1218.
12. American Heart Association, American Stroke Association. Facts: Preventable. Treatable. Beatable: stroke in the U.S. https://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@adv/documents/downloadable/ucm-305054.pdf. 2013.
13. Jia H, Cowper DC, Tang Y, Litt E, Wilson L,. Postacute stroke rehabilitation utilization: are there differences between rural-urban patients and taxonomies? J Rural Health. 2012; 28: 242-247.
14. Russell TG,. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2007; 13: 217-220.
15. Seelman K, Hartman L,. Telerehabilitation: policy issues and research tools. Int J Telerehabil N Am. 2009; 1: 12.
16. Telerehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther. 2010; 64 (6, suppl): S92-S102.
17. Chumbler NR, Rose DK, Griffiths P, et al. Study protocol: home-based telehealth stroke care: a randomized trial for veterans. Trials. 2010; 11: 74.
18. Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C,. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12): CD010255.
19. Kulcsar M, Gilchrist S, George MG,. Improving stroke outcomes in rural areas through telestroke programs: an examination of barriers, facilitators, and state policies. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 20: 3-10.
20. Huijgen BC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Zampolini M, et al. Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. J Telemed Telecare. 2008; 14: 249-256.
21. Johansson T, Wild C,. Telerehabilitation in stroke care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17: 1-6.
22. Piron L, Turolla A, Tonin P, Piccione F, Lain L, Dam M,. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare. 2008; 14: 257-260.
23. Carignan CR, Krebs HI,. Telerehabilitation robotics: bright lights, big future? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43: 695-710.
24. Rosati G,. The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010; 7: 753-758.
25. Boissy P, Briere S, Corriveau H, Grant A, Lauria M, Michaud F,. Usability testing of a mobile robotic system for in-home telerehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011: 1839-1842.
26. Huang VS, Krakauer JW,. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 6: 5.
27. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY,. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke: literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52: 269-293.
28. Rosati G, Roda A, Avanzini F, Masiero S,. On the role of auditory feedback in robot-assisted movement training after stroke: review of the literature. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2013; 2013: 586138.
29. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Pang CT, Nessler JA, Painter CC,. Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2002; 10: 102-108.
30. Zhang H, Austin H, Buchanan S, Herman R, Koeneman J, He J,. Feasibility studies of robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation at clinic and home settings using RUPERT. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011; 2011: 5975440.
31. Kutner NG, Zhang R, Butler AJ, Wolf SL, Alberts JL,. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2010; 90: 493-504.
32. Ganguli M, Fox A, Gilby J, Belle S,. Characteristics of rural homebound older adults: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996; 44: 363-370.
33. Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Reiss A, et al. The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2013; 8: 46-53.
34. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE,. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16: 232-240.
35. Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Wikstrom J, Autio L,. Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire as a screening test for dementia and delirium among the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987; 35: 412-416.
36. Banks JL, Marotta CA,. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007; 38: 1091-1096.
37. Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P,. Test-retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: Star Cancellation, Line Bisection, and the Baking Tray Task. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004; 14: 403-419.
38. Bohannon RW, Smith MB,. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67: 206-207.
39. Pocock SJ, Simon R,. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975; 31: 103-115.
40. Chakraborty H, Gu H,. A Mixed Model Approach for Intent-to-Treat Analysis in Longitudinal Clinical Trials With Missing Values. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009. http://www.rti.org/pubs/mr-0009-0904-chakraborty.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2015.
41. Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ,. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013; 346: e8668.
42. Linder SM, Reiss A, Buchanan S, et al. Incorporating robotic-assisted telerehabilitation in a home program to improve arm function following stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013; 37: 125-132.
43. Lyle RC,. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4: 483-492.
44. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH,. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998; 27: 107-113.
45. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G,. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19: 404-411.
46. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC,. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 78-90.
47. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW,. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1693-1700.
48. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 840-850.
49. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003; 17: 137-152.
50. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005; 19: 194-205.
51. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Norlin V,. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7: 73-83.
52. Jurkiewicz MT, Marzolini S, Oh P,. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011; 18: 277-284.
53. Hutchison AJ, Breckon JD,. A review of telephone coaching services for people with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17: 451-458.
54. Chiang KC, Seman L, Belza B, Tsai JH,. "It is our exercise family": experiences of ethnic older adults in a group-based exercise program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5: A05.
55. van der Lee JH, Roorda LD, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM,. Improving the Action Research Arm Test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 646-653.
56. Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G,. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42: 694-696.