The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: A randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 46-53

  Linder, Susan M ^a   Rosenfeldt, Anson B ^a   Reiss, Aimee ^b   Buchanan, Sharon ^c   Sahu, Komal ^b   Bay, Curtis R ^d   Wolf, Steven L ^b,e   Alberts, Jay L ^a,f  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Kinetic Muscles Inc   (United States)

^d A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Atlanta VA Rehab R and D Center   (United States)

^f LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Robotics; Stroke; Telerehabilitation; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; EXERCISE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; ROBOTICS; SELF REPORT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURVIVOR; TECHNOLOGY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; RURAL HEALTH; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84871710235     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00971.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L etal. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010; 41:2402-2448.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34:2181-2186.
3. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1677-1684.
4. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: the Willis lecture. Stroke 2000; 31:223-230.
5. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res 1987; 71:249-266.
6. Kaplon RT, Prettyman MG, Kushi CL, Winstein CJ. Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT). Clin Rehabil 2007; 21:950-958.
7. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist 2002; 8:325-338.
8. Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P etal. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40:2635-2660.
9. Bennett KJ, Olatosi B, Probst JC. Health Disparities: A Rural-Urban Chartbook. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, 2008.
10. Skolarus LE, Meurer WJ, Burke JF, Prvu Bettger J, Lisabeth LD. Effect of insurance status on postacute care among working age stroke survivors. Neurology 2012; 78:1590-1595.
11. Clark PA, Capuzzi K, Harrison J. Telemedicine: medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Med Sci Monit 2010; 16:RA261-272.
12. Carignan CR, Krebs HI. Telerehabilitation robotics: bright lights, big future? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43:695-710.
13. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83:952-959.
14. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22:111-121.
15. Johansson T, Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care - a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17:1-6.
16. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M etal. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41:1016-1102.
17. Lum PS, Uswatte G, Taub E, Hardin P, Mark VW. A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43:391-400.
18. Rosenstein LRA, Thota A, Samame B, Alberts JL. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2008; 62:28-34.
19. Kutner NG, Zhang R, Butler AJ, Wolf SL, Alberts JL. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2010; 90:493-504.
20. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975; 31:103-115.
21. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG etal. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1772-1783.
22. Winstein CJ, Wolf SL. Chapter 17: task oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery; in Stein J, Harvey RF, Macko RV, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz R (eds): Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Woodbridge, CT, Demos Publishing, 2009:267-290.
23. Wolf SW, Winstein CJ. Brain Repair After Stroke. Cramer SC, Nudo RJ (eds.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010:219-232.
24. Wolf SW, Winstein CJ, Miller JP etal. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296:2095-2104.
25. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22:78-90.
26. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19:404-411.
27. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing 1998; 27:107-113.
28. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:1693-1700.
29. Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY etal. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24:486-492.
30. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF etal. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2009; 89:840-850.
31. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S etal. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17:137-152.
32. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82:750-755.
33. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32:1635-1639.
34. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30:2131-2140.
35. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Norlin V. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7:73-83.
36. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16:232-240.
37. Shinar D, Gross CR, Price TR, Banko M, Bolduc PL, Robinson RG. Screening for depression in stroke patients: the reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Stroke 1986; 17:241-245.
38. Parikh RM, Eden DT, Price TR, Robinson RG. The sensitivity and specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in screening for post-stroke depression. Int J Psychiatry Med 1988; 18:169-181.
39. Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Arab TK, Jalaie S. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23:231-237.
40. Jurkiewicz MT, Marzolini S, Oh P. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011; 18:277-284.
41. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51:S225-239.
42. Christie L, Bedford R, McCluskey A. Task-specific practice of dressing tasks in a hospital setting improved dressing performance post-stroke: a feasibility study. Aust Occup Ther J 2011; 58:364-369.
43. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A, Szaflarski JP, Kissela BM. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2008; 88:333-340.
44. Harvey RL, Winstein CJ, Everest Trial G. Design for the Everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23:32-44.