Are Spatial-Numerical Associations a Cornerstone for Arithmetic Learning? The Lack of Genuine Correlations Suggests No

Mind, Brain, and Education

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 190-206

  Cipora, Krzysztof ^a,b   Patro, Katarzyna ^c   Nuerk, Hans Christoph ^c,d  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ^*  (Poland)

^c KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945135142     PISSN: 17512271     EISSN: 1751228X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12093     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Bachot, J., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Roeyers, H. (2005). Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: Orientation of the mental number line. Psychology Science, 47(1), 172-183.
2. Barth, H., Slusser, E., Cohen, D., & Paladino, A. (2011). A sense of proportion: Commentary on Opfer, Siegler, and Young. Developmental Science, 14, 1205-1206.
3. Berteletti, I., Man, G., & Booth, J. R. (2015). How number line estimation skills relate to neural activations in single digit subtraction problems. NeuroImage, 107, 198-206.
4. Bonato, M., Fabbri, S., Umiltà, C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1410-1419.
5. Bonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2257-2273.
6. Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189-201.
7. Briars, D., & Siegler, R. S. (1984). A featural analysis of preschoolers' counting knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 20, 607-618.
8. Bugden, S., & Ansari, D. (2011). Individual differences in children's mathematical competence are related to the intentional but not automatic processing of Arabic numerals. Cognition, 118, 32-44.
9. Bull, R., Cleland, A. A., & Mitchell, T. (2013). Sex differences in the spatial representation of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 181-192.
10. Bull, R., Espy, K. A., Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T. D., & Nelson, J. M. (2011). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: Sources of variation in emergent mathematic achievement. Developmental Science, 14, 679-692.
11. Calabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: A methodology. Neuropsychologia, 43, 779-783.
12. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
13. Cipora, K., Hohol, M., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K., Broz˙ek, B., Kucharzyk, B., & Neogoncka, E. (2015). Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations. Advance online publication. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6
14. Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2013). Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1974-1991.
15. Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1176-1191.
16. Cohen, D. J., & Blanc-Goldhammer, D. (2011). Numerical bias in bounded and unbounded number line tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 331-338.
17. Crollen, V., & Noël, M. P. (2015). Spatial and numerical processing in children with high and low visuospatial abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 84-98.
18. de Hevia, M. D., Girelli, L., Addabbo, M., & Cassia, V. M. (2014). Human infants' preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e96412.
19. de Hevia, M. D., Izard, V., Coubart, A., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(13), 4809-4813.
20. de Hevia, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 653-660.
21. de Hevia, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110, 198-207.
22. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
23. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 83-120.
24. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56, 384-398.
25. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
26. Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5-to 9-year old children: Evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 1-17.
27. Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). The relationship between children's familiarity with numbers and their performance in bounded and unbounded number line estimations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2-3), 136-154.
28. Eerland, A., Guadalupe, T. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Leaning to the left makes the Eiffel Tower seem smaller posture-modulated estimation. Psychological Science, 22, 1511-1514.
29. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423.
30. Fias, W., van Dijck, J. P., & Gevers, W. (2011). How number is associated with space: The role of working memory. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 133-148). London, UK: Academic Press.
31. Fischer, M. H. (2003a). Spatial representations in number processing: Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493-508.
32. Fischer, M. H. (2003b). Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Science, 14, 278-282.
33. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386-392.
34. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556.
35. Fischer, M. H., & Rottmann, J. (2005). Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line? Psychology Science, 47(1), 22-32.
36. Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition: From single digits to arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461-1483.
37. Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51, 91-97.
38. Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(1), 177-183.
39. Fuhs, M. W., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: Contributions of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 16(1), 136-148.
40. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 206-223.
41. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Gilmore, C., Attridge, N., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., Johnson, S., Marlow, N., ... Inglis, M. (2013). Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67374.
43. Ginsburg, V., van Dijck, J. P., Previtali, P., Fias, W., & Gevers, W. (2014). The impact of verbal working memory on number-space associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 976-986.
44. Göbel, S. M. (2015). Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane: A cross-cultural comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 228. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00228
45. Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: Evidence from eye movements on a blank screen. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 12.
46. Helmreich, I., Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2011). Language effects on children's non-verbal number line estimations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 598-613.
47. Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five? The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory and Cognition, 10, 389-395.
48. Hoffmann, D., Hornung, C., Martin, R., & Schiltz, C. (2013). Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 775-791.
49. Hoffmann, D., Mussolin, C., Martin, R., & Schiltz, C. (2014). The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85048.
50. Hoffmann, D., Pigat, D., & Schiltz, C. (2014). The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations. Cognitive Processing, 15, 329-342.
51. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
52. Huber, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2014). Dissociating number line estimations from underlying numerical representations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 991-1003.
53. Ischebeck, A., Zamarian, L., Egger, K., Schocke, M., & Delazer, M. (2007). Imaging early practice effects in arithmetic. NeuroImage, 36, 993-1003.
54. Jeannerod, M., Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1994). Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 32, 369-380.
55. Kamawar, D., LeFevre, J. A., Bisanz, J., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S. L., Smith-Chant, B., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Knowledge of counting principles: How relevant is order irrelevance? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 138-145.
56. Katz, C., & Knops, A. (2014). Operational momentum in multiplication and division? PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104777.
57. Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2008). Basic number processing deficits in ADHD: A broad examination of elementary and complex number processing skills in 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C. Developmental Science, 11, 692-699.
58. Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., Graf, M., Krinzinger, H., Delazer, M., & Willmes, K. (2009). TEDI-MATH Test zur Erfassung numerisch-rechnerischer Fertigkeiten vom Kindergarten bis zur 3. Klasse. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
59. Klein, E., Huber, S., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2014). Operational momentum affects eye fixation behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1614-1625.
60. Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324(5934), 1583-1585.
61. Knops, A., Viarouge, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71, 803-821.
62. Knops, A., Zitzmann, S., & McCrink, K. (2013). Examining the presence and determinants of operational momentum in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 325. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00325
63. Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schönmann, C., Plangger, F., ... von Aster, M. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 57, 782-795.
64. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Proximity and precedence in arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1953-1968.
65. Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395-438.
66. Lindemann, O., Alipour, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Finger counting habits in Middle Eastern and Western individuals: An online survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 566-578.
67. Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2013). Walk the number line: An embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 74-84.
68. Link, T., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2014). On the relation between the mental number line and arithmetic competencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1597-1613.
69. Loetscher, T., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator. Current Biology, 18(2), R60-R62.
70. Lonnemann, J., Krinzinger, H., Knops, A., & Willmes, K. (2008). Spatial representations of numbers in children and their connection with calculation abilities. Cortex, 44, 420-428.
71. Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2010). General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 873-881.
72. Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2013). Counting is easier while experiencing a congruent motion. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64500.
73. Masson, N., & Pesenti, M. (2014). Attentional bias induced by solving simple and complex addition and subtraction problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1514-1526.
74. McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1324-1333.
75. McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2009). Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 400-408.
76. Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009). Children's early mental number line: Logarithmic or decomposed linear? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 503-515.
77. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
78. Nuerk, H.-C., Bauer, F., Krummenacher, J., Heller, D., & Willmes, K. (2005). The power of the mental number line: How the magnitude of unattended numbers affects performance in an Eriksen task. Psychology Science, 47, 34-50.
79. Nuerk, H.-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 835-863.
80. Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie), 52(3), 187-194.
81. Opfer, J. E., & Furlong, E. E. (2011). How numbers bias preschoolers' spatial search. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 682-695.
82. Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Representational change and children's numerical estimation. Cognitive Psychology, 55(3), 169-195.
83. Opfer, J. E., & Thompson, C. A. (2006). Even early representations of numerical magnitude are spatially organized: Evidence for a directional magnitude bias in pre-reading preschoolers. In R. Sun & N. Miyaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 639-644). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
84. Opfer, J. E., Thompson, C. A., & Furlong, E. E. (2010). Early development of spatial-numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13, 761-771.
85. Patro, K., & Haman, M. (2012). The spatial-numerical congruity effect in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 534-542.
86. Patro, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Cress, U. (2015). Does your body count? Embodied influences on the preferred counting direction of preschoolers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 413-425.
87. Patro, K., Nuerk, H.-C., Cress, U., & Haman, M. (2014). How number-space relationships are assessed before formal schooling: A taxonomy proposal. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 419. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00419
88. Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition, 109, 408-415.
89. Pinhas, M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Heed the signs: Operation signs have spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1527-1540.
90. Rodic, M., Zhou, X., Tikhomirova, T., Wei, W., Malykh, S., Ismatulina, V., ... Kovas, Y. (2015). Cross-cultural investigation into cognitive underpinnings of individual differences in early arithmetic. Developmental Science, 18(1), 165-174.
91. Sasanguie, D., Defever, E., Maertens, B., & Reynvoet, B. (2014). The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 271-280.
92. Schneider, M., Grabner, R. H., & Paetsch, J. (2009). Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement: Their interrelations in Grades 5 and 6. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 359-372.
93. Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 651-664.
94. Schwarz, W., & Müller, D. (2006). Spatial associations in number-related tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 4-15.
95. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2012). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 804-809.
96. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Random walks on the mental number line. Experimental Brain Research, 232(1), 43-49.
97. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Göbel, S. M. (2012). Direction counts: A comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 275-281.
98. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328-331.
99. Siegler, R. S. (2009). Improving the numerical understanding of children from low-income families. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 118-124.
100. Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428-444.
101. Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-250.
102. Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Playing linear number board games-but not circular ones-improves low-income preschoolers' numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 545-560.
103. Slusser, E. B., Santiago, R. T., & Barth, H. C. (2013). Developmental change in numerical estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 193-208.
104. Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2007). Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(36), 14513-14518.
105. Turconi, E., Jemel, B., Rossion, B., & Seron, X. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(1), 22-38.
106. Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 1-34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
107. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352-402.
108. van Dijck, J. P., Abrahamse, E. L., Acar, F., Ketels, B., & Fias, W. (2014). A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1500-1513.
109. van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114-119.
110. Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2014). The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: An individual differences approach. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e95756.
111. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488.
112. Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2014). Aspects of situated cognition in embodied numerosity: The case of finger counting. Cognitive Processing, 15, 317-328.
113. Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Related but not the same: Ordinality, cardinality and 1-to-1 correspondence in finger-based numerical representations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 426-441.
114. Wiemers, M., Bekkering, H., & Lindemann, O. (2014). Spatial interferences in mental arithmetic: Evidence from the motion-arithmetic compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1557-1570.
115. Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42, 1069-1079.
116. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489-525.
117. Wynn, K. (1992). Children's acquisition of number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220-251.