Effect of ceramic membrane channel geometry and uniform transmembrane pressure on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration1

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 98, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 7527-7543

  Adams, Michael C ^a   Hurt, Emily E ^a   Barbano, David M ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Limiting flux; Microfiltration; Serum protein

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CASEIN; MILK PROTEIN; PLASMA PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; FILTRATION; FOOD HANDLING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MILK; PH;

ANIMALS; BLOOD PROTEINS; CASEINS; CERAMICS; FILTRATION; FOOD HANDLING; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MILK; MILK PROTEINS;

EID: 84944150360     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9753     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams M.C., Barbano D.M. Serum protein removal from skim milk with a 3-stage, 3× ceramic Isoflux membrane process at 50°C. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:2020-2034.
2. Adams M.C., Hurt E.E., Barbano D.M. Impact of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:7483-7497.
3. Official Methods of Analysis 2000, AOAC International, AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. 17th.
4. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W. Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments, and applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:42-69.
5. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 96:1-58.
6. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. Costs and Processing Economics 1998, 339. Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Lancaster, PA.
7. Chiu T.Y., Lara Dominguez M.V., James A.E. Non-circular ceramic membranes for use in wastewater treatment. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2005, 31:53-60.
8. COMSOL. 2013. Which turbulence model should I choose for my CFD application? Accessed Mar. 13, 2015. http://http://www.comsol.com/blogs/which-turbulence-model-should-choose-cfd-application/.
9. Elwell M.W., Barbano D.M. Use of microfiltration to improve fluid milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:E20-E30.
10. Gesan-Guiziou G., Daufin G., Boyaval E., Le Berre O. Wall shear stress: Effective parameter for the characterization of the cross-flow transport in turbulent regime during skimmed milk microfiltration. Lait 1999, 79:347-354.
11. Hurt E., Barbano D.M. Processing factors that influence casein and serum protein separation by microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:4928-4941.
12. Hurt E., Zulewska J., Newbold M., Barbano D.M. Micellar casein concentrate production with a 3 ×, 3-stage uniform transmembrane pressure ceramic membrane process at 50°C. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5588-5600.
13. Hurt E.E., Adams M.C., Barbano D.M. Microfiltration: Effect of retentate protein concentration on limiting flux and serum protein removal with 4-mm-channel ceramic microfiltration membranes. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:2234-2244. a.
14. Hurt E.E., Adams M.C., Barbano D.M. Microfiltration: Effect of channel diameter on limiting flux and serum protein removal. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:3599-3613. b.
15. Kaylegian K.E., Houghton G.E., Lynch J.M., Fleming J.R., Barbano D.M. Calibration of infrared milk analyzers: Modified milk versus producer milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:2817-2832.
16. Obot N.T. Determination of incompressible flow friction in smooth circular and noncircular passages: A generalized approach including validation of the nearly century old hydraulic diameter concept. J. Fluids Eng. 1988, 110:431-440.
17. Pafylias I., Cheryan M., Mehaia M.A., Saglam N. Microfiltration of milk with ceramic membranes. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29:141-146.
18. Saiyood K., Bumrungthaichaichan E., Wattananusorn S., Chandra-ambhorn W. CFD modeling of microfiltration membrane with seven star-shaped channels. Ladkrabang Eng. J. 2013, 30:43-48.
19. Samuelsson G., Huisman I.H., Tragardh G., Paulsson M. Predicting limiting flux of skim milk in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:277-281.
20. Sandblom, R. M., inventor. 1978. Filtering process. Alfa-Laval AB, assignee. US Pat. No. 4,105,547.
21. Vadi P.K., Rizvi S.S.H. Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:69-82.
22. Verdi R.J., Barbano D.M., Dellavalle M.E., Senyk G.F. Variability in true protein, casein, nonprotein nitrogen, and proteolysis in high and low somatic cell milks. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70:230-242.
23. Wojciechowski K.L., Barbano D.M. Modification of the Kjeldahl noncasein nitrogen to include bovine milk concentrates and milks from other species. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:7510-7526.
24. Zulewska J., Newbold M., Barbano D.M. Efficiency of serum protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and polymeric membranes at 50°C. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:1361-1377.