ATM Dependent Silencing Links Nucleolar Chromatin Reorganization to DNA Damage Recognition

Cell Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 251-259

  Harding, Shane M ^a   Boiarsky, Jonathan A ^a   Greenberg, Roger A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; ATM PROTEIN, HUMAN; CHROMATIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME NOR; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; GENE SILENCING; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; MCF-7 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NUCLEOLUS;

ANIMALS; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED PROTEINS; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEOLUS; CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; GENE SILENCING; HUMANS; MCF-7 CELLS; MICE; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84944069159     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.085     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berkovich E., Monnat R.J., Kastan M.B. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:683-690.
2. Boulon S., Westman B.J., Hutten S., Boisvert F.-M., Lamond A.I. The nucleolus under stress. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:216-227.
3. Cho N.W., Dilley R.L., Lampson M.A., Greenberg R.A. Interchromosomal homology searches drive directional ALT telomere movement and synapsis. Cell 2014, 159:108-121.
4. Ciccia A., Huang J.-W., Izhar L., Sowa M.E., Harper J.W., Elledge S.J. Treacher Collins syndrome TCOF1 protein cooperates with NBS1 in the DNA damage response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:18631-18636.
5. Deckbar D., Birraux J., Krempler A., Tchouandong L., Beucher A., Walker S., Stiff T., Jeggo P., Löbrich M. Chromosome breakage after G2 checkpoint release. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:749-755.
6. Dion V., Gasser S.M. Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell 2013, 152:1355-1364.
7. Fanucchi S., Shibayama Y., Burd S., Weinberg M.S., Mhlanga M.M. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell 2013, 155:606-620.
8. Goldstein M., Kastan M.B. Repair versus checkpoint functions of Brca1 are differentially regulated by site of chromatin binding. Cancer Res. 2015, 75:2699-2707.
9. Grummt I. The nucleolus-guardian of cellular homeostasis and genome integrity. Chromosoma 2013, 122:487-497.
10. Gyori B.M., Venkatachalam G., Thiagarajan P.S., Hsu D., Clement M.-V. OpenComet: an automated tool for comet assay image analysis. Redox Biol. 2014, 2:457-465.
11. Helleday T. Homologous recombination in cancer development, treatment and development of drug resistance. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31:955-960.
12. Huang S., Rothblum L.I., Chen D. Ribosomal chromatin organization. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 84:444-449.
13. Im J.-S., Keaton M., Lee K.Y., Kumar P., Park J., Dutta A. ATR checkpoint kinase and CRL1βTRCP collaborate to degrade ASF1a and thus repress genes overlapping with clusters of stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2014, 28:875-887.
14. Kakarougkas A., Ismail A., Chambers A.L., Riballo E., Herbert A.D., Künzel J., Löbrich M., Jeggo P.A., Downs J.A. Requirement for PBAF in transcriptional repression and repair at DNA breaks in actively transcribed regions of chromatin. Mol. Cell 2014, 55:723-732.
15. Kruhlak M., Crouch E.E., Orlov M., Montaño C., Gorski S.A., Nussenzweig A., Misteli T., Phair R.D., Casellas R. The ATM repair pathway inhibits RNA polymerase I transcription in response to chromosome breaks. Nature 2007, 447:730-734.
16. Larsen D.H., Hari F., Clapperton J.A., Gwerder M., Gutsche K., Altmeyer M., Jungmichel S., Toledo L.I., Fink D., Rask M.-B., et al. The NBS1-Treacle complex controls ribosomal RNA transcription in response to DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:792-803.
17. Matsuoka S., Ballif B.A., Smogorzewska A., McDonald E.R., Hurov K.E., Luo J., Bakalarski C.E., Zhao Z., Solimini N., Lerenthal Y., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
18. O'Sullivan A.C., Sullivan G.J., McStay B. UBF binding in vivo is not restricted to regulatory sequences within the vertebrate ribosomal DNA repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:657-668.
19. Panier S., Durocher D. Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:661-672.
20. Panier S., Boulton S.J. Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:7-18.
21. Pankotai T., Bonhomme C., Chen D., Soutoglou E. DNAPKcs-dependent arrest of RNA polymerase II transcription in the presence of DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:276-282.
22. Prieto J.-L., McStay B. Pseudo-NORs: a novel model for studying nucleoli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783:2116-2123.
23. Reynolds R.C., Montgomery P.O., Hughes B. Nucleolar "caps" produced by actinomycin D. Cancer Res. 1964, 24:1269-1277.
24. Rothkamm K., Krüger I., Thompson L.H., Löbrich M. Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:5706-5715.
25. Russell J., Zomerdijk J.C.B.M. The RNA polymerase I transcription machinery. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 2006, 73:203-216.
26. Shanbhag N.M., Rafalska-Metcalf I.U., Balane-Bolivar C., Janicki S.M., Greenberg R.A. ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2010, 141:970-981.
27. Shav-Tal Y., Blechman J., Darzacq X., Montagna C., Dye B.T., Patton J.G., Singer R.H., Zipori D. Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:2395-2413.
28. Tang J., Cho N.W., Cui G., Manion E.M., Shanbhag N.M., Botuyan M.V., Mer G., Greenberg R.A. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:317-325.
29. Torres-Rosell J., Sunjevaric I., De Piccoli G., Sacher M., Eckert-Boulet N., Reid R., Jentsch S., Rothstein R., Aragón L., Lisby M. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:923-931.
30. Turner J.M.A. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 2007, 134:1823-1831.
31. Ui A., Nagaura Y., Yasui A. Transcriptional elongation factor ENL phosphorylated by ATM recruits polycomb and switches off transcription for DSB repair. Mol. Cell 2015, 58:468-482.
32. van Sluis M., McStay B. A localized nucleolar DNA damage response facilitates recruitment of the homology-directed repair machinery independent of cell cycle stage. Genes Dev. 2015, 29:1151-1163.
33. Williams G.J., Hammel M., Radhakrishnan S.K., Ramsden D., Lees-Miller S.P., Tainer J.A. Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2014, 17:110-120.