Changing academic identities in the context of a Managerial University – Bridging the duality between professions and organizations: Evidence from the U.S. and Europe

The Relevance of Academic Work in Comparative Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 59-73

  Leisyte, Liudvika ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943601407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11767-6_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Ackroyd, S., Kirkpatrick, I., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization: A comparative analysis. Public Administration, 85 (1), 9-26.
2. Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56 (3), 241-281.
3. Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Amaral, A., Bleiklie, I., & Musselin, C. (Eds.). (2008). From governance to identity. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
6. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
7. Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: A survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education, 63 (4), 529-547.
8. Braun, D., & Merrien, F.-X. (1999). Governance of universities and modernisation of the state: Analytical aspects. Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
9. Bunton, S., & Mallon, W. (2007). The impact of centers and institutes on faculty life: Findings from a study of life sciences faculty at research-intensive universities' medical schools. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 93-103.
10. Campbell, T., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relations. Journal of Higher Education, 70 (3), 309-352.
11. Clark, B. R. (1963). Faculty culture. In T. F. Lunsford (Ed.), The study of campus cultures. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
12. Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.
14. de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). On striking the right notes: Shifts in governance and the organizational transformation of universities. Public Administration, 85 (1), 27-46.
15. De Bruijn, J. A. (2010). Managing professionals. London: Routledge.
16. de Weert, E. (2009). The organised contradictions of teaching and research: Reshaping the profession. In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life (pp. 134-154). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
17. Deem, R., Hillyard, S., Reed, M., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Douglass, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London: Barrie & Rockliff.
19. Eckel, P., & Morphew, C. (2009). The organizational dynamics of privatization in public research universities. In C. Morphew & P. Eckel (Eds.), Privatizing the public university: Perspectives from across the academy (pp. 88-108). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Enders, J., & de Weert, E. (2009). The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
21. Fairweather, J., & Beach, A. (2002). Variations in faculty work at research universities: Implications for state and institutional policy. Review of Higher Education, 26 (1), 97-115.
22. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity.
23. Geiger, R. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
25. Gumport, P. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 64 (3), 283-311.
26. Hakala, J. (2009). The future of the academic calling? Junior researchers in the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education, 57 (2), 173-190.
27. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education (Vol. 46). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
28. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy revisited. In I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge: A study of continuity and change in higher education. A festschrift in honor of Maurice Kogan (pp. 145-165). Dordrecht: Springer.
29. Huisman, J. (2009). International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination. London: Routledge.
30. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38, 922-935.
31. Kehm, B., & Leisyte, L. (2010). Effects of new governance on research in the humanities: The example of medieval history. In D. Jansen (Ed.), Governance and performance in the German public research sector. Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33 (5), 513-526.
33. Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. Drori, J. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241-257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Lee, J., & Rhoads, R. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45 (7), 739-760.
35. Leisyte, L. (2007). University governance and academic research: Case studies of research units in Dutch and English universities. Ph. D. thesis. Enschede: University of Twente, CHEPS.
36. Leisyte, L. (2011). Research commercialization policies and their implementation in the Netherlands and in the US. Science and Public Policy, 38 (6), 437-448.
37. Leisyte, L., & Dee, J. (2012). Changing academic practices and identities in Europe and the US. Critical perspectives. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 123-206). Dordrecht: Springer.
38. Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & de Boer, H. (2008). The freedom to set research agendas-illusion and reality of the research units in the Dutch universities. Higher Education Policy, 21, 377-391.
39. Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & de Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58 (5), 619-635.
40. Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & de Boer, H. (2010). Mediating problem choice: Academic researchers' responses to changes in their institutional environment. In R. Whitley, J. Gläser, & L. Engwall (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation (pp. 291-324). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Loomis, C. P., & McKinney, J. C. (2002). Community and society by Ferdinand Tönnies. Devon: David and Charles.
42. Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
43. Maassen, P. (1996). Governmental steering and the academic culture. Enschede: CHEPS.
44. Mallon, W. (2006). Centers, institutes, and academic decision making: Addressing "suburban sprawl" through strategies for "smart growth. ". In P. Eckel (Ed.), The shifting frontiers of academic decision making: Responding to new priorities, following new pathways (pp. 55-74). Westport: ACE/Praeger.
45. Marton, S. (2005). Academics and the mode-2 society: Shifts in knowledge production in the humanities and social sciences. In I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge: A study of continuity and change in higher education. A Festschrift in honour of Maurice Kogan (pp. 169-188). Dordrecht: Springer.
46. McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students' ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education, 49, 255-289.
47. Melguizo, T., & Strober, M. (2007). Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige. Research in Higher Education, 48 (6), 633-668.
48. Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. Journal of Higher Education, 78 (1), 71-96.
49. Morrell, K. (2006). Policy narrative: New labour's reform of the national health service. Public Administration, 84 (2), 367-385.
50. Morris, N., & Rip, A. (2006). Scientists' coping strategies in an evolving research system: The case of life scientists in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 33 (4), 253-263.
51. Musselin, C. (2005). Le Marché des universitaires. France, Allemagne, États-Unis. Paris: Science Po.
52. Musselin, C. (2008). Towards the sociology of academic work. In A. Amaral, I. Bleiklie, & C. Musselin (Eds.), From governance to identity (pp. 47-56). Dordrecht: Springer.
53. Musselin, C. (2009). Profession, market, and organization: How is academia regulated? In J. Enders & E. de Weert (Eds.), The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives (pp. 117-133). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
54. Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32 (10), 1349-1371.
55. Noordegraaf, M., & Schinkel, W. (2010). Professional capital contested: A Bourdieusian analysis of conflicts between professionals and managers. Comparative Sociology, 10 (1), 1-29.
56. Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student learning: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33-47). London: Routledge.
57. Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s? Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Rip, A. (2011). Protected spaces of science: Their emergence and future evolution in a changing world. In M. Carrier & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Science in the context of application (pp. 197-220). Springer: Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
60. Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? Ph. D. scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39, 422-434.
61. Schimank, U., & Winnes, M. (2000). Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems. Science and Public Policy, 27 (6), 397-408.
62. Schuster, J., & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63. Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29 (2), 219-238.
64. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65. Slaughter, S., Archerd, C., & Campbell, T. (2004). Boundaries and quandaries: How professors negotiate market relations. Review of Higher Education, 28 (1), 129-165.
66. Suddaby, R., Cooper, C. J., & Greenwood, R. (2007). Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (4-5), 333-362.
67. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildawsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
68. Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
69. Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2010). Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45 (3), 307-335.
71. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science. What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.