Variations in faculty work at research universities: Implications for state and institutional policy

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 97-115

  Fairweather, James S ^a   Beach, Andrea L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036744607     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2002.0024     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Banta, T. (1986). Performance funding in higher education: A critical analysis of Tennessee's experience. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
2. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195-203.
3. Bok, D. (1992). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24, 12-19.
4. Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper and Row.
5. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Cage, M. (1995, January 20). Regulating faculty workloads. Chronicle of Higher Education, A-30, A-33.
7. Cambridge, B. (2001). Fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning: Communities of practice. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds)., To improve the academy (Vol. 19, pp. 3-15). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
8. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Author.
9. Carnevale, A., Johnson, N., & Edwards, A. (1998, April 10). Performance-based appropriations: Fad or wave of the future? Chronicle of Higher Education, B-6.
10. Colbeck, C. (2002). State policies to improve undergraduate teaching: Administrator and faculty responses. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 3-25.
11. Colbeck, C., & Fairweather, J. (1999, November). Enhancing faculty contributions to learning productivity: The effect of state policy on faculty work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, Texas.
12. Colbeck, C., Salerno, C., & Moran, L. (1998, November). Mandated time: Direct and indirect impact of a state faculty workload policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami.
13. Diamond, R. (1999). Aligning faculty rewards with institutional mission: Statements, policies, and guidelines. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
14. Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Finkelstein, M., Seal, R., & Schuster, J. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Geiger, R. (1993). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Geiger, R., & Feller, I. (1995). The dispersion of academic research in the 1980s. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 336-360.
18. Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Hearn, J. (1992). The teaching role in contemporary American higher education: Popular imagery and organizational reality. In W. Becket & D. Lewis (Eds.), The economics of higher education (pp. 17-68). Boston: Kluwer.
20. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L, (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, New developments. Change, 31, 11-15.
21. The Nation: Resources. (2000). Chronicle of Higher Education: 2000/2001 Almanac Issue 40(30).
22. Russell, S., Fairweather, J., Cox, R., & Boismier, J. (1990). Faculty in higher education institutions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
23. Trow, M. (1984). The analysis of status. In B. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives in higher education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views. Berkeley: University of California Press.