University commercialization policies and their implementation in the Netherlands and the United States

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 437-448

  Leisyte, Liudvika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INFORMAL SECTOR; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; REGULATORY APPROACH; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

NETHERLANDS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80755189447     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267778     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Balzat, M 2006. An Economic Analysis of Innovation. Extending the Concept of National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Benneworth, P and B W Jongbloed 2010. Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorization. Higher Education, 59, 567-588.
3. Borrell-Damian, L 2009. Collaborative Doctoral Education. Brussels: EUA.
4. Chesbrough, H 2003. Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Clark, B R 1983. The Higher Education System. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
6. Colyvas, J and W W Powell 2006. Roads to institutionalization. the remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 27, 305-353.
7. Croissant, J L and L Smith-Doerr 2008. Organizational contexts of science: boundaries and relationships between university and industry. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, eds E J Hackett, O Amsterdamska, M Lynch and J Wajcman, pp. 691-718. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. De Boer, H, L Leisyte and J Enders 2006. The Netherlands: 'steering from a distance'. In Reforming University Governance: Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries, eds B Kehm and U Lanzendorf. Bonn: Lemmens.
9. Dill, D and F van Vught 2010. National Innovation and the Academic Research Enterprise: Public Policy in Global Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Duderstadt, J J 2005. University-Industry-Government Partnership for a 21st century Global, Knowledge-driven Economy: an American Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
11. Etzkowitz, H and L A Leydesdorff 1997. Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Pinter.
12. Etzkowitz, H, A Webster and P Healey 1998. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Foray, D and S Lhuillery 2010. Structural changes in industrial R&D in Europe and the US: towards a new model? Science and Public Policy, 37(6), July, 401-412.
14. Geiger, R L 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Geiger, R L and C Sá 2008. Tapping the Riches of Science: Universities and the Promise of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
17. Greenberg, D S 2001. Science, Money and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Hatakenaka, S 2003. University-Industry Partnerships in MIT, Cambridge and Tokyo. New York: Routledge Falmer.
19. Hu, H and W Mosmuller 2008. Stimulating entrepreneurship in life sciences: the Dutch approach. In Pathways to High-tech Valleys and Research Triangles: Innovative Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster Formation in Europe and the United States, eds W Hulsink and H Dons, pp. 155-178. Wageningen: Springer.
20. Hutchinson, B S 2005. Academic capitalism, organizational change, and student workers: a case study of an organized research unit in a public research university. Doctoral dissertation. University of Arizona.
21. Innovation Platform 2008. Valorisatieagenda, Kennis moet circuleren. Available at: , last accessed 15 January 2011.
22. Jongbloed, B and B van der Meulen 2006. De follow-up van onderzoeksvisitaties. Onderzoek in opdracht van deCommissie Dynamisering. Eindrapportage. Investeren in dynamiek. Eindrapport commissie Dynamisering (deel 2). Enschede: CHEPS.
23. Krücken, G, F Meier and A Müller 2007. Information, cooperation, and the blurring of boundaries: technology transfer in German and American discourses. Higher Education, 53, 675-696.
24. Krücken, G, F Meier and A Müller 2009. Linkages to the civil society as 'leisure time activities'? Experiences at a German university. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), March, 139-144.
25. Leisyte, L 2007. University Governance and Academic Research. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente.
26. Link, A N and D S Siegel 2007. Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Lundvall, B A 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
28. MEA, Ministry of Economic Affairs 1995. Rijksoctrooiwet 1995. The Hague: MEA. Available at: , last accessed 16 February 2011.
29. MEA, Ministry of Economic Affairs 2006. Science, Technology and Innovation in the Netherlands. The Hague: MEA.
30. Metcalfe, J S 1995. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25-46.
31. MOCW 1992. The Higher Education and Research Act (WHW). The Hague: MOCW.
32. MOCW 2004. Wetenschapsbudget 2004. Focus op excellentie en meer waarde. The Hague: MOCW.
33. MOCW 2008. Key Figures: Education, Culture and Science at a Glance. The Hague: MOCW.
34. Moncada-Paterno-Castello, P 2010. Introduction to a special issue: New insights on EU-US comparison of corporate R&D. Science and Public Policy, 37(6), July, 391-400.
35. Mowery, DC2009. Plus ca change: industrialR&Din the third industrial revolution. Industrial and CorporateChange, 18(1), 1-50.
36. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2004. Universities in national innovation systems. In Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds J Fagerberg, D C Mowery and R R Nelson, pp. 209-239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. NCES 2009. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Washington DC: US Department of Education.
38. Nelson, R T 1993. National Innovation Systems:, a Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. North, D C 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. NSF 2009. NSF Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges. Arlington: NSF.
41. NSF 2011. About the National Science Foundation, available: last accessed 10 January 2011.
42. NWO, Netherlands Research Council 2010. NWO in Figures 2010. The Hague: NWO.
43. OECD 2007. Thematic Review of Tertiary Education. The Netherlands. Paris: OECD.
44. OECD 2010. Main Science and Technology Indicators, Paris: OECD.
45. Portnoy, M 2010. General Overview of the NIH SBIR/STTR Program. Presentation at Boot Camp Workshop, University of Maryland, 22 October 2010. Available at: , last accessed 10 February 2011.
46. Rip, A and B van der Meulen 1996. The post-modern research system. Science and Public Policy, 23(6), 343-352.
47. Slaughter, S 1990. The Higher Learning and High Technology: Dynamics of Higher Education Policy Formation. Albany: SUNY Press.
48. Slaughter, S and H Rhoades 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. Stokes, D E 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
50. Van Vught, F 2008. Knowledge Transfer in the European Union. Presentation at the CHEPS Seminar on Knowledge Transfer, Enschede, 17 July.
51. Zomer, AH, BWA Jongbloed and J Enders 2010. Do Spin-offsmake the academics' heads spin? The impacts of spin-off companies on their parent research organisation. Minerva, 48(3), 331-353.