Protected Spaces of Science: Their Emergence and Further Evolution in a Changing World

Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science

Volumn 274, Issue , 2011, Pages 197-220

  Rip, Arie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Funding Agency; Indigenous Knowledge; Knowledge Production; Late Nineteenth Century; Social Contract

Indexed keywords

EID: 85102016363     PISSN: 00680346     EISSN: 22147942     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Asher, I., A. Keynan, and M. Zadok (eds.). 1995. Strategies for the National Support of Basic Research: An International Comparison. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
2. Atkinson-Grosjean, J. 2006. Public Science, Private Interests. Culture and Commerce in Canada’s Networks of Centres of Excellence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3. Battiste, M. (ed.). 2000. Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press.
4. Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
5. Beck, U., and C. Lau. 2005. Second modernity as a research agenda: Theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. British Journal of Sociology 99(4): 525–557.
6. Berwick, D.M. 2005. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. Quality and Safety of Health Care 14:315–1316.
7. Biagioli, M. 1993. Galileo, Courtier. The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
8. Brown, G.E., Jr. 1996. Environmental Science Under Siege. A Report by Repr. George E. Brown, Jr., US Congress, Oct. 23, 1996.
9. Bush, V. 1945. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Washington, DC, July 1945. Reprinted, with Appendices and a Foreword by D.J. Kevles, by the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, 1990.
10. Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
11. Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2003. Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society 25:193–204.
12. Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Campbell, D.T. 1979. A tribal model of the social system vehicle carrying scientific knowledge. Knowledge 1(2):181–201.
14. Clark, B.R. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. De Boer, H., J. Huisman, A. Klemperer, B. van der Meulen, G. Neave, H. Theisens, and M. van der Wende. 2002. Academia in the 21st Century. An Analysis of Trends and Perspectives in Higher Education and Research. The Hague: AWT (Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps-en Technologiebeleid).
16. Delvenne, P., and A. Rip. 2010, Reflexive modernization in action: Pathways of science and technology institutions. Social Science Information.
17. Eamon, W. 1985. From the secrets of nature to public knowledge: The origins of the concept of openness in science. Minerva 23(3):321–347.
18. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29:109–123.
19. Felt, U., and B. Wynne et al. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance, to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Brussels: European Communities (EUR 22700).
20. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
21. Gilbert, G.N., and M. Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box. A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22. Guston, D.H., and K. Kenniston. 1994. Introduction: The social contract for science. In The Fragile Contract. University Science and the Federal Government, eds. D.H. Guston, and K. Kenniston, 1–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hessels, L.K., and H. van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37:740–760.
24. Hufbauer, K. 1982. The Formation of the German Chemical Community (1720–1795). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. ICSU. 2002. Science and Traditional Knowledge. Report from the ICSU Study Group on Science and Traditional Knowledge. Paris: International Council of Scientific Unions.
26. Irvine, J., and B.R. Martin. 1984. Foresight in Science. Picking the Winners. London: Frances Pinter.
27. Kearnes, M., and A. Rip. 2009. The emerging governance landscape of nanotechnology. In Jenseits von Reguliering: Zum politischen Umgang mit Nanotechnologie, eds. S. Gammel, A. Lösch, A. Nordmann, Berlin: Akademische Verlagsanstalt. forthcoming.
28. Kogan, M. 2005. Modes of knowledge and patterns of power. Higher Education 49:9–30.
29. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Second, enlarged edition.
30. Kuhn, T.S. 1977. The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Fact. Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage.
32. MacLeod, R. 1972. Resources of science in Victorian England: The endowment of science movement, 1868–1900. In Science and Society, 1600–1900, ed. P. Mathias, 111–166. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Markus, E. (rapporteur), K. Siune (chair), Calloni, M., U. Felt, A. Gorski, A. Grunwald, A. Rip, deS. Vladimir, and S. Wyatt. 2009. Challenging Futures of Science in Society – Emerging Trends and Cutting-Edge Issues. Report of the MASIS Expert Group Set Up by the European Commission. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, Science in Society.
34. Mendelsohn, E. 1969. Three scientific revolutions. In Science and Policy Issues. Lectures in Government and Science, ed. P.J. Piccard, 19–36. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
35. Merton, R.K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, MA: University of Chicago Press. Edited and with an Introduction by Norman W. Storer.
36. Morrell, J., and A. Thackray. 1981. Gentlemen of Science. Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Nordmann, A. 2008. Philosophy of technoscience. In Nanotechnology. Volume 1: Principles and Fundamentals, ed. G. Schmid, 217–243. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
38. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
39. Polanyi, M. 1962. The republic of science. Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1(1):54–73.
40. Polanyi, M. 1963. The potential theory of adsorption. Authority in science has its uses and its dangers. Science 141:1010–1013.
41. Rip, A. 1982. The development of restrictedness in the sciences. In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, eds. N. Elias, H. Martins, and R. Whitley, 219–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42. Rip, A. 1985. Commentary: Peer review is alive and well in the United States. Science, Technology & Human Values 10(3):82–86.
43. Rip, A. 1988. Contextual transformations in contemporary science. In Keeping Science Straight. A Critical Look at the Assessment of Science and Technology, ed. A. Jamison, 59–87. Gothenburg: Department of Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg.
44. Rip, A. 1994. The republic of science in the 1990s. Higher Education 28:3–23.
45. Rip, A. 1997. A cognitive approach to relevance of science. Social Science Information 36(4): 615–640.
46. Rip, A. 2000a. Fashions, lock-ins, and the heterogeneity of knowledge production. In The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, eds. Merle J., and T. Hellström, 28–39. Buckingham: Open University Press.
47. Rip, A. 2000b. Higher forms of nonsense. European Review 8(4):467–485.
48. Rip, A. 2002a. Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer 27:123–131.
49. Rip, A. 2002b. Science for the 21st century. In The Future of the Sciences and Humanities. Four Analytical Essays and a Critical Debate on The Future of Scholastic Endeavour, eds. P. Tindemans, A. Verrijn-Stuart, and R. Visser, 99–148. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
50. Rip, A. 2007. Research choices and directions – in changing contexts. In Nano Researchers Facing Choices, eds. M. Deblonde et al., 33–48. Antwerpen: Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius.
51. Rip, A., and F.A.J. van Steijn. 1985. Effecten van de stimulering van de biotechnologie op de academische cultuur en de mogelijkheden tot kennisoverdracht. Amsterdam: Department of Science Dynamics. A Report to the Government Office of Science Policy. Also published in Maatschappelijke aspecten van de biotechnologie, 169–190. Den Haag: Staatsuitgeverij.
52. Ross, S. 1962. Scientist: The story of a word. Annals of Science 18:65–85.
53. Schäfer, W. (ed.). 1983. Finalization in Science. The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
54. Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
55. Shove, E., and A. Rip. 2000. Users and unicorns: A discussion of mythical beasts. Science and Public Policy 27(3):175–182.
56. Slack, J. 1972. Class struggle among the molecules. In Countercourse, ed. T. Pateman, 202–217. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
57. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai Te Rina. 2000. Kaupapa Maori research. In Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision, ed. Battiste, Marie, 225–247. Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press.
58. Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down”. Power, Participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2):262–294.
59. Stokes, D. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
60. Toulmin, S. 1990. Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Van den Belt, H., and A. Rip. 1987. The Nelson-Winter/Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, eds. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch, 135–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Van den Daele, W. 1977a. Die soziale Konstruktion der Wissenschaft – Institutionalisierung und Definition der positiven Wissenschaft in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. Jahrhunderts. In Experimentelle Philosophie. Ursprünge autonomer Wissenschaftsentwicklung, eds. G. Böhme, W. Van den Daele, and W. Krohn, 129–182. Frankfurt a/Main: Suhrkamp.
63. Van den Daele, W. 1977b. The Social construction of science: Institutionalization and definition of positive science in the latter half of the 17th century. In The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, eds. E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, and R. Whitley, 27–54. Dordrecht: Reidel.
64. Wittrock, B., and A. Elzinga (eds.). 1985. The University Research System. The Public Policies of the Home of the Scientists. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.