An assessment of the amount of untapped fold level novelty in under-sampled areas of the tree of life

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Barry Roche, Daniel ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Brüls, Thomas ^a,b,c  

^a CENTRE NATIONAL DE SÉQUENÇAGE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^e UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^f Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MICROFLORA; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; MICROBIOTA; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOME;

EID: 84943339301     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep14717     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Roche D. B., Buenavista, M. T., & McGuffin, L. J. in Encyclopedia of Biophysics ed Gordon C. K. Roberts) (Springer, 2012).
2. Brenner, S. E., & Levitt, M. Expectations from structural genomics. Protein Sci 9, 197-200, doi: 10.1110/ps.9.1.197 (2000).
3. Chandonia, J. M., & Brenner, S. Update on the pfam5000 strategy for selection of structural genomics targets. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1, 751-755, doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616523 (2005).
4. Chandonia, J. M., & Brenner, S. E. Implications of structural genomics target selection strategies: Pfam5000, whole genome, and random approaches. Proteins 58, 166-179, doi: 10.1002/prot.20298 (2005).
5. Todd, A. E., Marsden, R. L., Thornton, J. M., & Orengo, C. A. Progress of structural genomics initiatives: an analysis of solved target structures. J Mol Biol 348, 1235-1260, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.037 (2005).
6. Chandonia, J. M., & Brenner, S. E. The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science 311, 347-351, doi: 10.1126/science.1121018 (2006).
7. Liu, J., Montelione, G. T., & Rost, B. Novel leverage of structural genomics. Nat Biotechnol 25, 849-851, doi: 10.1038/nbt0807-849 (2007).
8. Shin, D. H. et al. Structure-based inference of molecular functions of proteins of unknown function from Berkeley Structural Genomics Center. J Struct Funct Genomics 8, 99-105, doi: 10.1007/s10969-007-9025-4 (2007).
9. Nair, R. et al. Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage. J Struct Funct Genomics 10, 181-191, doi: 10.1007/s10969-008-9055-6 (2009).
10. Andreeva, A., & Murzin, A. G. Structural classification of proteins and structural genomics: new insights into protein folding and evolution. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 66, 1190-1197, doi: 10.1107/S1744309110007177 (2010).
11. Khafizov, K., Madrid-Aliste, C., Almo, S. C., & Fiser, A. Trends in structural coverage of the protein universe and the impact of the Protein Structure Initiative. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 3733-3738, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321614111 (2014).
12. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D222-230, doi: 10.1093/gkt1223 (2014).
13. Mistry, J., Kloppmann, E., Rost, B., & Punta, M. An estimated 5% of new protein structures solved today represent a new Pfam family. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69, 2186-2193, doi: 10.1107/S0907444913027157 (2013).
14. Sillitoe, I. et al. New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D490-498, doi: 10.1093/gks1211 (2013).
15. Fox, N. K., Brenner, S. E., & Chandonia, J. M. SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins-extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D304-309, doi: 10.1093/gkt1240 (2014).
16. Qin, J et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464 59-65, doi: 10.1038/ nature08821 2010).
17. Yooseph, S. et al. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol 5, e16, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050016 (2007).
18. Godzik, A. Metagenomics and the protein universe. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21, 398-403, doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.010 (2011).
19. Jaroszewski, L. et al. Exploration of uncharted regions of the protein universe. PLoS Biol 7, e1000205, doi: 10.1371/journal. pbio.1000205 (2009).
20. Rinke, C. et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499, 431-437, doi: 10.1038/ nature12352 (2013).
21. Wrighton, K. C. et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661-1665, doi: 10.1126/science.1224041 (2012).
22. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 449, 804-810, doi: 10.1038/nature06244 (2007).
23. Wu, D et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 462 1056-1060, doi: 10.1038/ nature08656 2009).
24. Cuff, A. L. et al. Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D420-426, doi: 10.1093/gkq1001 (2011).
25. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7, e1002195, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 (2011).
26. Yeats, C. et al. Gene3D: comprehensive structural and functional annotation of genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36, D414-418, doi: 10.1093/gkm1019 (2008).
27. Linding, R. et al. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11, 1453-1459 (2003).
28. Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305, 567-580, doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 (2001).
29. Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A., & Soding, J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nature methods 9, 173-175, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1818 (2012).
30. de Beer, T. A., Berka, K., Thornton, J. M., & Laskowski, R. A. PDBsum additions. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D292-296, doi: 10.1093/ gkt940 (2014).
31. Zhang, Y., & Skolnick, J. TM-Align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 2302-2309, doi: 10.1093/gki524 (2005).
32. Xu, J, & Zhang, Y. How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics 26 889-895, doi: 10.1093/btq066 2010).