Effects of group housing on sow welfare: A review

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1999-2017

  Verdon, M ^a   Hansen, C F ^b   Rault, J L ^a   Jongman, E ^a   Hansen, L U ^c   Plush, K ^d   Hemsworth, P H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c Danish Agriculture and Food Council   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aggression; Group housing; Productivity; Sow; Welfare

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARDS; VETERINARY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; FEEDING METHODS; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; SWINE;

EID: 84942643059     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8742     Document Type: Review

References (171)

1. Algers, B., M. Sanaa, T. Nunes, B. Wechsler, H. A. M. Spoolder, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, and L. J. Pedersen. 2007. Scientific report on animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and weaned piglets. EFSA J. 572:1-107.
2. Andersen, I. L., and K. E. Bøe. 1999. Straw bedding or concrete floor for loose-housed pregnant sows: Consequences for aggression, production and physical health. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A 49:190-195.
3. Andersen, I. L., K. E. Bøe, and A. L. Kristiansen. 1999. The influence of different feeding arrangements and food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65:91-104. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00058-1.
4. Anil, L., S. S. Anil, J. Deen, S. K. Baidoo, and R. D. Walker. 2006. Effect of group size and structure on the welfare and performance of pregnant sows in pens with electronic sow feeders. Can. J. Vet. Res. 70:128-136.
5. Anil, L., K. M. Bhend, S. K. Baidoo, R. Morrison, and J. Deen. 2003. Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 223:1334-1338. doi:10.2460/javma.2003.223.1334.
6. Arey, D. S. 1999. Time course for the formation and disruption of social organization in group-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:199-207. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00224-X.
7. Arey, D. S., and S. A. Edwards. 1998. Factors affecting aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:61-70. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00144-4.
8. Barnett, J. L. 1997. Modifying the design of group pens with individual feeding places affects the welfare of pigs. In: R. W. Bottcher and S. J. Hoff, editors, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. American Soc. Agri. Engineers., St. Joseph, MI. p. 613-618.
9. Barnett, J. L., G. M. Cronin, T. H. McCallum, and E. A. Newman. 1993. Effects of pen size/shape and design on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:111-122. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90003-8.
10. Barnett, J. L., G. M. Cronin, C. G. Winfield, and A. M. Dewar. 1984. The welfare of adult pigs: The effects of five housing treatments on behaviour, plasma corticosteroids and injuries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12:209-232. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(84)90115-1.
11. Barnett, J. L., and P. H. Hemsworth. 2009. Welfare monitoring schemes: Using research to safeguard the welfare of animals on the farm. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 12:114-131. doi:10.1080/10888700902719856.
12. Barnett, J. L., P. H. Hemsworth, G. M. Cronin, E. C. Jongman, and G. D. Hutson. 2001. A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52:1-28. doi:10.1071/AR00057.
13. Barnett, J. L., P. H. Hemsworth, G. M. Cronin, E. A. Newman, T. H. McCallum, and D. Chilton. 1992. Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34:207-220. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80116-9.
14. Barnett, J. L., P. H. Hemsworth, D. P. Hennessy, T. M. McCallum, and E. A. Newman. 1994. The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on the behavioural, physiological and production responses of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 41:87-100. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(94)90054-X.
15. Barnett, J. L., P. H. Hemsworth, C. G. Winfield, and C. Hansen. 1986. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. I. Effects of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:249-257. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90117-6.
16. Bench, C. J., F. C. Rioja-Lang, S. M. Hayne, and H. W. Gonyou. 2013a. Group gestation housing with individual feeding—I: How feeding regime, resource allocation, and genetic factors affect sow welfare. Livest. Sci. 152:208-217. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.021.
17. Bench, C. J., F. C. Rioja-Lang, S. M. Hayne, and H. W. Gonyou. 2013b. Group gestation housing with individual feeding—II: How space allowance, group size and composition, and flooring affect sow welfare. Livest. Sci. 152:218-227. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.020.
18. Benus, R. F., S. Dendaas, J. M. Koolhaas, and G. A. Vanoortmerssen. 1990. Routine formation and flexibility in social and non-social behavior of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice. Behav, 112: 176-193.
19. Bergeron, R., J. Bolduc, Y. Ramonet, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, and S. Robert. 2000. Feeding motivation and stereotypies in pregnant sows fed increasing levels of fiber and/or food. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70:27-40. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00142-8.
20. Bergeron, R., and H. W. Gonyou. 1997. Effects of increasing energy intake and foraging behaviours on the development of stereotypies in pregnant sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 53:259-270. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01169-0.
21. Borberg, C., and S. Hoy. 2008. Mixing of sows with or without the presence of a boar. Livest. Sci. 125:314-317. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.04.008.
22. Boyle, L. A., F. C. Leonard, P. B. Lynch, and P. Brophy. 2002. Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:119-134. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00211-8.
23. Broom, D. M. 1983. Stereotypes as animal welfare indicators. In: D. Smidt, editor, Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Brussels, The Netherlands. p. 81-87.
24. Broom, D. M., M. T. Mendl, and A. J. Zanella. 1995. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim. Sci. 61:369-385.
25. Brouns, F., and S. A. Edwards. 1994. Social rank and feeding behaviour of group-housed sows fed competitively or ad-libitum. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:225-235.
26. Brouns, F., S. A. Edwards, and P. R. English. 1994. Effect of dietary fiber and feeding system on activity and oral behaviour of group housed gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:215-223. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(94)90157-0.
27. Brouns, F., S. A. Edwards, and P. R. English. 1995. Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 54:301-313. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(95)00767-H.
28. Chapinal, N., J. L. Ruiz de la Torre, A. Cerisuelo, J. Gasa, M. D. Baucells, J. Coma, A. Vidal, and X. Manteca. 2010. Evaluation of welfare and productivity in pregnant sows kept in stalls or in 2 different group housing systems. J. Vet. Behav. 5:82-93. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2009.09.046.
29. Danielsen, V., and E. M. Vestergaard. 2001. Dietary fiber for pregnant sows: Effect on performance and behaviour. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:71-80. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00197-3.
30. de Jong, I. C., S. Van Voorst, D. A. Ehlhardt, and H. J. Blokhuis. 2002. Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders. Br. Poult. Sci. 43(2):157-168. doi:10.1080/00071660120121355.
31. de Leeuw, J. A., J. E. Bolhuis, G. Bosch, and W. J. J. Gerrits. 2008. Effects of dietary fibre on behaviour and satiety in pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 67:334-342. doi:10.1017/S002966510800863X.
32. de Leeuw, J. A., and E. D. Ekkel. 2004. Effects of feeding level and the presence of a foraging substrate on the behaviour and stress physiological response of individually housed gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86:15-25. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.004.
33. de Leeuw, J. A., A. W. Jongbloed, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2004. Dietary fiber stabilizes blood glucose and insulin levels and reduces physical activity in sows (Sus scrofa). J. Nutr. 134:1481-1486.
34. de Leeuw, J. A., J. J. Zonderland, H. Altena, H. A. M. Spoolder, A. W. Jongbloed, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2005. Effects of levels and sources of dietary fermentable non-starch polysaccharides on blood glucose stability and behaviour of grouphoused pregnant gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 94:15-29. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.006.
35. D’Eath, R. B. 2004. Consistency of aggressive temperament in domestic pigs: The effects of social experience and social disruption. Aggress. Behav. 30:435-448. doi:10.1002/ab.20077.
36. D’Eath, R. B. 2005. Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93:199-211. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.019.
37. D’Eath, R. B., and L. J. Keeling. 2003. Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: From peck orders to social tolerance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84:197-212. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.010.
38. D’Eath, R. B., R. Roehe, S. P. Turner, S. H. Ison, S. H. Farish, M. C. Jack, and A. B. Lawrence. 2009. Genetics of animal temperament: Aggressive behaviour at mixing is genetically associated with the response to handling in pigs. Animal 3:1544-1554. doi:10.1017/S1751731109990528.
39. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2003. Code of Recommendations for the welfare of livestock: pigs. Defra publications, London.
40. Docking, C. M., R. M. Kay, J. E. L. Day, and H. L. Chamberlain. 2001. The effect of stocking density, group size and boar presence on the behaviour, aggression and skin damage of sows mixed in a specialized mixing pen at weaning. In: Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Sci., Scarborough, UK. p. 46. (Abst).
41. Durrell, J. L., V. E. Beattie, I. A. Sneddon, and D. Kilpatrick. 2003. Premixing as a technique for facilitating subgroup formation and reducing sow aggression in large dynamic groups. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84:89-99. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2003.06.001.
42. Durrell, J. L., I. A. Sneddon, and V. E. Beattie. 1997. Effects of enrichment and floor type on behaviour of cubicle loose-housed dry sows. Anim. Welf. 6:297-308.
43. Durrell, J. L., I. A. Sneddon, V. E. Beattie, and D. J. Kilpatrick. 2002. Sow behaviour and welfare in voluntary cubicle pens (small static groups) and split-yard systems (large dynamic groups). Anim. Sci. 75:67-74.
44. Edwards, S. A. 1992. Scientific perspectives on loose housing systems for dry sows. Pig Vet. J. 28:40-51.
45. Edwards, S. A., S. Mauchline, and A. H. Stewart. 1993. Designing pens to minimise aggression when sows are mixed. Farm Build. Prog. 113:20-23.
46. Erhard, H. W., and M. Mendl. 1997. Measuring aggressiveness in growing pigs in a resident-intruder situation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:123-136. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00069-5.
47. Erhard, H. W., M. Mendl, and D. Ashley. 1997. Individual aggressiveness of pigs can be measured and used to reduce aggression after mixing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:137-151. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00068-3.
48. Fisker, B. N. 1995. Strategy for transfer of group-housed gestating sows. Pig Research Centre. http://vsp.lf.dk/Publikationer/Kilder/lu_medd/medd/311.aspx. (In Danish.) (Accessed 2 September 2014.)
49. Fisker, B. N. 1999. Feed with 60 % ‘Pulpetter’ (dried sugar beet pulp) for gestating sows housed in stable groups. Pig Research Centre. (http://vsp.lf.dk/Publikationer/Kilder/lu_medd/medd/444.aspx. (In Danish) Accessed 2 September 2014.)
50. Fraile, I. G., B. S. McEwen, and D. W. Pfaff. 1987. Progesterone inhibition of aggressive behaviors in hamsters. Physiol. Behav. 39:225-229. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(87)90013-8.
51. Fraser, D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare: The science in its cultural context. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK.
52. Gabor, T. M., E. C. Hellgren, R. A. Van den Bussche, and N. J. Silvy. 1999. Demography, sociospatial behaviour and genetics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a semi-arid environment. J. Zool., 247, 311-322.
53. Geverink, N. A., B. Ampe, E. Struelens, and F. A. M. Tuyttens. 2008. On-farm welfare evaluation of group-housed sows. In:L. Boyle, N. O’Connell and A. Hanlon Proc. 42nd Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Dublin, Ireland. p. 8. (Abst).
54. Geverink, N. A., and F. A. M. Tuyttens. 2007. On-farm evaluation of group-housing for sows. In:F. Galindo and L. Alvarez Proc. 41st Int. Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Merida, Mexico. p. 201. (Abst).
55. Gonyou, H. W. 2001. The social behaviour of pigs. In: L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou, editors, Social behaviour of farm animals. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK. p. 147-176.
56. Gonyou, H. W. 2005. Experiences with alternative methods of sow housing. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 226:1336-1339. doi:10.2460/javma.2005.226.1336.
57. Gonyou, H. W., P. H. Hemsworth, and J. L. Barnett. 1986. Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:269-278. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90119-X.
58. Heinonen, M., O. Peltoniemi, and A. Valros. 2013. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in sows on welfare, health and production. Livest. Sci. 156:2-9. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.06.002.
59. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, and G. J. Coleman. 2009. The integration of human-animal relations into animal welfare monitoring schemes. Anim. Welf. 18:335-345.
60. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, G. J. Coleman, and C. Hansen. 1989. A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23:301-314. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(89)90099-3.
61. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, and C. Hansen. 1986b. The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and female pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15:303-314. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90123-1.
62. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, and C. Hansen. 1981b. The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids in the juvenile female pig. Horm. Behav. 15:396-403. doi:10.1016/0018-506X(81)90004-0.
63. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, and C. Hansen. 1987. The influence of inconsistent handling on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 17:245-252. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(87)90149-3.
64. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, C. Hansen, and C. G. Winfield. 1986a. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. II. Effects of space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:259-267. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90118-8.
65. Hemsworth, P. H., A. Brand, and P. J. Willems. 1981b. The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and their productivity. Livest. Prod. Sci. 8:67-74. doi:10.1016/0301-6226(81)90031-2.
66. Hemsworth, P. H., and G. J. Coleman. 2011. Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity and welfare of farmed animals, 2nd ed. CAB International, Oxon UK.
67. Hemsworth, P. H., G. J. Coleman, and J. L. Barnett. 1994. Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:349-362. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(94)90168-6.
68. Hemsworth, P. H., M. Rice, J. Nash, K. Giri, K. L. Butler, A. J. Tilbrook, and R. S. Morrison. 2013. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: Aggression, stress, skin injuries and reproductive performance. J. Anim. Sci. 91:4953-4964. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5807.
69. Hillmann, E., F. von Hollen, B. Bunger, D. Todt, and L. Schrader. 2003. Farrowing conditions affect the reactions of piglets towards novel environment and social confrontation at weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81:99-109. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00254-X.
70. Hodgkiss, N. J., J. C. Eddison, P. H. Brooks, and P. Bugg. 1998. Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders. Vet. Rec. 143:604-607. doi:10.1136/vr.143.22.604.
71. Hsu, Y. Y., R. L. Earley, and L. L. Wolf. 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: Mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81:33-74. doi:10.1017/S146479310500686X.
72. Hsu, Y. Y., and L. L. Wolf. 2001. The winner and loser effect: What fighting behaviours are influenced? Anim. Behav. 61:777-786. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1650.
73. Hunter, E. J., D. M. Broom, S. A. Edwards, and R. M. Sibly. 1988. Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer controlled feeder. Anim. Prod. 47:139-148. doi:10.1017/S0003356100037144.
74. Hutson, G. D. 1991. A note on hunger in the pig: Sows on restricted rations will sustain an energy deficit to gain additional food. Anim. Prod. 52:233-235. doi:10.1017/S0003356100005882.
75. Jansen, J., R. N. Kirkwood, A. J. Zanella, and R. J. Templeman. 2007. Influence of gestation housing on sow behaviour and fertility. J. Swine Health Prod. 15:132-136.
76. Jensen, K. H., L. S. Sørensen, D. Bertelsen, A. R. Pedersen, E. Jørgensen, N. P. Nielsen, and K. S. Vestergaard. 2000. Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group housing systems with electronic sow feeding: A field trial. J. Anim. Sci. 71:535-545.
77. Jensen, M. B., L. J. Pedersen, P. K. Theil, C. C. Yde, and K. E. Bach Knudsen. 2012. Feeding motivation and plasma metabolites in pregnant sows fed diets rich in dietary fiber either once or twice daily. J. Anim. Sci. 90:1910-1919. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3289.
78. Jensen, P., and J. Yngvesson. 1998. Aggression between unacquainted pigs - Sequential assessment and effects of familiarity and weight. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58:49-61. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00097-X.
79. Karlen, G. A. M., P. H. Hemsworth, H. W. Gonyou, E. Fabrega, A. D. Strom, and R. J. Smits. 2007. The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. App. Anim. Behav. Sci, 105:87-101.
80. Kemp, B., N. M. Soede, and P. Langendijk. 2005. Effects of boar contact and housing condition on estrus expression in sows. Theriogenology 63:643-656. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.038.
81. Kennedy, M. J., and D. M. Broom. 1994. A method of mixing gilts and sows which reduces aggression experienced by gilts. Proc. 28th Int. Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Foulum, Denmark. p. 157. (Abst).
82. Kennedy, M. J., and D. M. Broom. 1996. Factors modulating aggression received by pigs mixed individually into groups. In: I. J. H. Duncan, T. M. Widowski, and D. B. Haley Proc. 30th Int. Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Ontario, Canada, p. 52. (Abst).
83. Kirchner, J., G. Manteuffel, and L. Schrader. 2012. Individual calling to the feeding station can reduce agonistic interactions and lesions in group housed sows. J. Anim. Sci. 90:5013-5020. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4478.
84. Knox, R., J. Salak-Johnson, M. Hopgood, L. Greiner, and J. Connor. 2014. Effect of day of mixing gestating sows on measures of reproductive performance and animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. 92:1698-1707. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6432.
85. Kohlert, J. G., and R. L. Meisel. 2001. Inhibition of aggression by progesterone and its metabolites in female Syrian hamsters. Aggress. Behav. 27:372-381. doi:10.1002/ab.1022.
86. Krause, M., C. E. Vant Klooster, R. G. Bure, J. H. M. Metz, and H. H. Sambraus. 1997. The influence of sequential and simultaneous feeding and the availability of straw on the behaviour of gilts in group housing. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 45:33-48.
87. Kudryavtseva, N. N., N. P. Bondar, and D. F. Avgustinovich. 2004. Effects of repeated experience of aggression on the aggressive motivation and development of anxiety in male mice. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 34:721-730. doi:10.1023/B:NEAB.0000036013.11705.25.
88. Langendijk, P., and O. Peltoniemi. 2013. How does nutrition influence luteal function and early embryo survival? In: H. Rodriguez-Martinez. N. Soede, and W. L. Flowers Control of pig reproduction IX: Proc. Int. Conf. Pig. Reprod., Osztyn, Poland. p. 49. (Abst).
89. Langendijk, P., N. M. Soede, and B. Kemp. 2000. Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in weaned sows. J. Anim. Sci. 78:871-878.
90. Lawrence, A. B., M. C. Appleby, and H. A. MacLeod. 1989. Measuring hunger in the pig using operant conditioning: The effect of dietary bulk. Anim. Prod. 48:213-220. doi:10.1017/S0003356100003925.
91. Lawrence, A. B., and E. M. C. Terlouw. 1993. A review of behavioural factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviours in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2815-2825.
92. Leeb, B., C. Leeb, J. Troxler, and M. Schuh. 2001. Skin lesions and callosities in group-housed pregnant sows: Animal-related welfare indicators. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect A. 51:82-87.
93. Lehner, S. R., C. Rutte, and M. Taborsky. 2011. Rats benefit from winner and loser effects. Ethology. 117:949-960.
94. Li, Y. Z., and H. W. Gonyou. 2013. Comparison of management options for sows kept in pens with electronic feeding stations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93:445-452. doi:10.4141/cjas2013-044.
95. Li, Y. Z., and L. J. Johnston. 2009. Behaviour and performance of pigs previously housed in large groups. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1472-1478. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1202.
96. Li, Y. Z., L. H. Wang, and L. J. Johnston. 2012. Sorting by parity to reduce aggression toward first parity sows in group-gestation housing systems. J. Anim. Sci. 90:4514-4522. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4869.
97. Lindberg, A. C. 2001. Group life. In: L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou, editors, Social behaviour in farm animals. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK. p. 37-58.
98. Løvendahl, P., L. H. Damgaard, B. L. Nielsen, K. Thodberg, G. Su, and L. Rydhmer. 2005. Aggressive behaviour of sows at mixing and maternal behaviour are heritable and genetically correlated traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 93:73-85. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.008.
99. Marchant-Forde, J. N. 2009. Welfare of dry sows. In: J. N. Marchant-Forde, editor, The welfare of pigs. Springer, New York, NY. p. 95-139.
100. Marchant-Forde, J. N., and R. M. Marchant-Forde. 2005. Minimizing inter-pig aggression during mixing. Pig News Info. 26:63N-71N.
101. Mason, G. J., and N. R. Latham. 2004. Can’t stop, won’t stop: Is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Anim. Welf. 13:S57-S69.
102. Matthews, L. R., and P. H. Hemsworth. 2012. Drivers of change: Law, international markets, and policy. Anim. Front. 2:40-45. doi:10.2527/af.2012-0047.
103. Mendl, M., and J. M. Deag. 1995. How useful are the concepts of alternative strategy and coping strategy in applied studies of social behavior. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:119-137.
104. Mendl, M., A. J. Zanella, and D. M. Broom. 1992. Physiological and reproductive correlates of behavioural strategies in female domestic pigs. Anim. Behav. 44:1107-1121. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80323-9.
105. Meunier-Salaün, M. C., S. A. Edwards, and S. Robert. 2001. Effect of dietary fiber on the behaviour and health of the restricted sow. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:53-69. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00196-1.
106. Moore, A. S., H. W. Gonyou, and A. W. Ghent. 1993. Integration of newly introduced and resident sows following grouping. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38:257-267. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90024-J.
107. Mount, N. C., and M. F. Seabrook. 1993. A study of aggression when group housed sows are mixed. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:377-383. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90134-B.
108. Muráni, E., S. Ponsuksii, R. B. D’Eath, S. P. Turner, E. Kurt, G. Evans, L. Thölking, R. Klont, A. Foury, P. Mormède, and K. Wimmers. 2010. Association of HPA axis related genetic variation with stress reactivity and aggressive behaviour in pigs. BMC Genet. 11:74. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-74.
109. Newberry, R. C., M. Špinka, and S. Cloutier. 2000. Early social experience of piglets affects rate of conflict resolution with strangers after weaning. In:A. Ramos, L. C. Pinheiro Machade and M. J. Hötzel Proc. 34th Int. Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Florianópolis, Brazil. p. 67. (Abst).
110. Nicholson, R. I., J. J. McGlone, and L. N. Reid. 1993. Quantification of stress in sows: Comparison of individual housing versus social penning. J. Anim. Sci. 71(Suppl. 1):112 (Abstr.).
111. Nicol, C. J., G. Caplen, P. Statham, and W. J. Browne. 2011. Decisions about foraging and risk trade-offs in chickens are associated with individual somatic response profiles. Anim. Behav. 82:255-262. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.04.022.
112. Nielsen, B. L., A. B. Lawrence, and C. T. Whittemore. 1995. Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single-space feeders. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44:73-85. doi:10.1016/0301-6226(95)00060-X.
113. Nielsen, N.-P. 1999. Time of grouping of sows housed in dynamic groups. Pig Research Centre. http://vsp.lf.dk/Publikationer/Kilder/lu_medd/medd/451.aspx. (In Danish.) (Accessed 2 September 2014.)
114. O’Connell, N. E. 2007. Influence of access to grass silage on the welfare of sows introduced to a large dynamic group. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107:45-57. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.020.
115. Olsson, A. C., M. Andersson, J. Botermans, D. Rantzer, and J. Svendsen. 2011. Animal interaction and response to electronic sow feeding (ESF) in 3 different herds and effects of function settings to increase capacity. Livest. Sci. 137:268-272. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.014.
116. Olsson, A. C., and O. V. Samuelsson. 1993. Grouping studies of lactating and newly weaned sows. In: E. Collins and C. Boom Proc. 4th Int. Symp. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng. Livest. Environ, Coventry, UK. 475-482.
117. Olsson, A. C., J. Svendsen, and D. Reese. 1994. Housing of gestating sows in long narrow pens with liquid feeding: Function studies and grouping routines in five sow pools. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 24:131-141.
118. Olsson, I. A. S., F. H. de Jonge, T. Schuurman, and F. A. Helmond. 1999. Poor rearing conditions and social stress in pigs: Repeated social challenge and the effect on behavioural and physiological responses to stressors. Behav. Processes 46:201-215. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00036-4.
119. Pedersen, L. J., T. Heiskanen, and B. I. Damm. 2003. Sexual motivation in relation to social rank in pair-housed sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 75:39-53. doi:10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00208-7.
120. Pedersen, L. J., T. Rojkittikhun, S. Einarsson, and L. E. Edqvist. 1993. Postweaning grouped sows: Effects of aggression on hormonal patterns and estrus behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38:25-39. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90039-R.
121. Potegal, M. 1979. The reinforcing value of several types of aggressive behavior: A review. Aggressive Behav. 5:353-373. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1979)5:4<353::AID-AB2480050404>3.0.CO;2-7
122. Puppe, B. 1998. Effects of familiarity and relatedness on agonistic pair relationships in newly mixed domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58:233-239. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00107-5.
123. Ramonet, Y., J. Bolduc, R. Bergeron, S. Robert, and M. C. Meunier-Salaün. 2000. Feeding motivation in pregnant sows: Effects of fibrous diets in an operant conditioning procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 66:21-29. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00077-5.
124. Ramonet, Y., J. Bolduc, S. Robert, R. Bergeron, and M. C. Meunier-Salaün. 1998. Feeding motivation and stereotypies in pregnant sows fed increasing levels of fiber and/or food. In: I. Veissier and A. Boissy Proc. 32nd Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol.., Clermont-Ferrand, France. p. 181. (Abst).
125. Rasmussen, H. 2012. Socialising gilts to cope as young sows in group housing. In: S. Waiblinger, C. Winckler and A. Gutmann Proc. 46th Congr. Intl. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Vienna, Austria. p. 115. (Abst).
126. Rault, J.-L., R. M. Morrison, C. Hansen, and P. H. Hemsworth. 2014. Effects of group housing after weaning on sow welfare and sexual behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 92:5683-5692. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8238.
127. Réale, D., and N. J. Dingemanse. 2010. Personality and individual social specialisation. In: T. Székely, A. J. Moore and J. Komdeur, editors, Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 417-441.
128. Remience, V., J. Wavreille, B. Canart, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, A. Prunier, N. Bartiaux-Thill, B. Nicks, and M. Vandenheede. 2008. Effects of space allowance on the welfare of dry sows kept in dynamic groups and fed with electronic sow feeder. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 112:284-296. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.07.006.
129. Robert, S., R. Bergeron, C. Farmer, and M. C. Meunier-Salaun. 2002. Does the number of daily meals affect feeding motivation and behaviour of gilts fed high-fiber diets? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:105-117. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00003-5.
130. Robert, S., J. J. Matte, C. Farmer, C. L. Girard, and G. P. Martineau. 1993. High-fiber diets for sows: Effects on stereotypies and adjunctive drinking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 37:297-309. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90119-A.
131. Robert, S., J. Rushen, and C. Farmer. 1997. Both energy content and bulk of food affect stereotypic, heart rate and feeding motivation of female pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:161-171. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00067-1.
132. Rodenburg, B., and P. Koene. 2007. The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103:205-214. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.024.
133. Rodríguez-Estévez, V., M. Sánchez-Rodríguez, A. G. Gómez-Castro, and S. A. Edwards. 2010. Group sizes and resting locations of free range pigs when grazing in a natural environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 127:28-36. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.08.010.
134. Salak-Johnson, J. L., A. E. DeDecker, M. J. Horsman, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas. 2012. Space allowance for gestation sows in pen: Behavior and immunity. J. Anim. Sci. 90:3232-3242. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4531.
135. Salak-Johnson, J. L., S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis, and S. E. Curtis. 2007. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions and performance. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1758-1769. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-510.
136. Samarakone, T. S., and H. W. Gonyou. 2009. Domestic pigs alter their social strategy in response to social group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 121:8-15. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.08.006.
137. Schneider, J. D., M. D. Tokach, S. S. Dritz, J. L. Nelssen, J. M. DeRouchey, and R. D. Goodband. 2007. Effects of feeding schedule on body condition, aggressiveness, and reproductive failure in group-housed sows. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3462-3469. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0345.
138. Scott, K., G. P. Binnendijk, S. A. Edwards, J. H. Guy, M. C. Kiezebrink, and H. M. Vermeer. 2009. Preliminary evaluation of a prototype welfare monitoring system for sows and piglets (Welfare Quality® project). Anim. Welf. 18:441-449.
139. Séguin, M. J., R. M. Friendship, R. N. Kirkwood, A. J. Zanella, and T. M. Widowski. 2006. Effects of boar presence on agonistic behaviour, shoulder scratches, and stress response of bred sows at mixing. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1227-1237.
140. Souza da Silva, C., J. J. G. C. van den Borne, W. J. J. Gerrits, B. Kemp, and J. E. Bolhuis. 2012. Effects of dietary fibers with different physiochemical properties on feeding motivation in adult female pigs. Physiol. Behav. 107:218-230. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.001.
141. Spoolder, H. A. M., J. A. Burbridge, S. A. Edwards, A. B. Lawrence, and P. H. Simmins. 1997. Effect of food level on performance and behaviour of sows in a dynamic group-housing systems with electronic feeding. Anim. Sci. 65:473-482. doi:10.1017/S1357729800008675.
142. Spoolder, H. A. M., J. A. Burbidge, S. A. Edwards, P. H. Simmins, and A. L. Lawrence. 1995. Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43:249-262. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(95)00566-B.
143. Spoolder, H. A. M., M. J. Geudeke, C. M. C. Van der Peet-Schwering, and N. M. Soede. 2009. Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: A review of success and risk factors. Livest. Sci. 125:1-14. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.009.
144. Stevens, B., G. M. Karlen, R. Morrison, H. W. Gonyou, K. L. Butler, K. J. Kerswell, and P. J. Hemsworth. 2015. Effects of stage of gestation at mixing on aggression, injuries and stress in sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 165:40-46. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.002.
145. Stewart, C. L., N. E. O’Connell, and L. Boyle. 2008. Influence of access to straw provided in racks on the welfare of sows in large dynamic groups. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 112:235-247. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.09.006.
146. Strawford, M. L., Y. Z. Li, and H. W. Gonyou. 2008. The effect of management strategies and parity on the behaviour and physiology of gestating sows housed in an electronic sow feeding system. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 88:559-567. doi:10.4141/CJAS07114.
147. Stricklin, W. R. 2001. The evolution and domestication of social behaviour. In: L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou, editors, Social behaviour in farm animals. CAB International, Oxon, UK. p. 83-110.
148. Stukenborg, A., I. Traulsen, E. Stamer, B. Puppe, U. Presuhn, and J. Krieter. 2012. Heritabilities of agonistic behavioural traits in pigs and their relationships within and between different age groups. Livest. Sci. 149:25-32. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.020.
149. Taylor, I. A., J. L. Barnett, and G. M. Cronin. 1997. Optimum group size for pigs. In: R. W. Bottcher and S. J. Hoff Proc. 5th. Int. Symp. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng. Livest. Environ., MI. p. 965-971.
150. Terlouw, E. M., A. B. Lawrence, and A. W. Illius. 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Anim. Behav. 42:981-991. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80151-4.
151. Toscano, M. J., D. C. Lay, B. A. Craig, and E. A. Pajor. 2007. Assessing the adaptation of swine to fifty-seven hours of feed deprivation in terms of behavioral and physiological responses. J. Anim. Sci. 85(2):441-451. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-316.
152. Turner, S. P., and S. A. Edwards. 2004. Housing immature domestic pigs in large social groups: Implications for social organisation in a hierarchical society. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87:239-253. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.010.
153. Turner, S. P., S. A. Edwards, and V. C. Bland. 1999. The influence of drinker allocation and group size on the drinking behaviour, welfare and production of growing pigs. Anim. Sci. 68:617-624.
154. Turner, S. P., M. Ewen, J. A. Rooke, and S. A. Edwards. 2000. The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deeplitter at different group sizes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 66:47-55. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00159-7.
155. Turner, S. P., M. J. Farnworth, I. M. S. White, S. Brotherstone, M. Mendl, P. Knap, P. Penny, and A. B. Lawrence. 2006. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96:245-259. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.009.
156. Turner, S. P., R. Roehe, R. B. D’Eath, S. H. Ison, M. Farish, M. C. Jack, N. Lundeheim, L. Rydhmer, and A. B. Lawrence. 2009. Genetic validation of skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of post-mixing aggressiveness and the relationship with aggression under stable social conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3076-3082. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1558.
157. Turner, S. P., R. Roehe, W. Mekkawy, M. J. Farnworth, P. W. Knap, and A. B. Lawrence. 2008. Bayesian analysis of genetic associations of skin lesions and behavioural traits to identify genetic components of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Behav. Genet. 38:67-75. doi:10.1007/s10519-007-9171-2.
158. van Putten, G., and R. G. Buré. 1997. Preparing gilts for group housing by increasing their social skills. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:173-183. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00063-4.
159. van Putten, G., and J. A. van de Burgwal. 1990. Vulva biting in group-housed sows: Preliminary report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26:181-186. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(90)90097-W.
160. Velarde, A. 2007. Agonistic behaviour. In: A. Velarde and R. Reers, editors, On farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 53-56.
161. Verdon, M. 2014. Sow aggression in groups: Predicting and implications for sow welfare. PhD Diss. The Animal Welfare Science Centre, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
162. Virolainen, J. V., O. A. Peltoniemi, C. Munsterhjelm, A. Tast, and S. Einarsson. 2005. Effect of feeding level on progesterone concentration in early pregnant multiparous sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 90:117-126. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.012.
163. Virolainen, J. V., A. Tast, A. Sorsa, R. J. Love, and O. A. T. Peltoniemi. 2004. Changes in feeding level during early pregnancy affect fertility in gilts. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 80:341-352. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.08.005.
164. Weng, R. C., S. A. Edwards, and P. R. English. 1998. Behaviour, social interactions and lesion score of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59:307-316. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00143-3.
165. Wechsler, B. 1995. Coping and coping strategies - a behavioral view. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43:123-134.
166. Whittaker, X., S. A. Edwards, H. A. M. Spoolder, A. B. Lawrence, and S. Corning. 1999. Effects of straw bedding and high fiber diets on the behaviour of floor fed group-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63:25-39. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00243-3.
167. Whittaker, X., H. A. M. Spoolder, S. A. Edwards, A. B. Lawrence, and S. Corning. 1998. The influence of dietary fiber and the provision of straw on the development of stereotypic behaviour in food restricted pregnant sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 61:89-102. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00183-X.
168. Wiegand, R. M., H. W. Gonyou, and S. E. Curtis. 1994. Pen shape and size: Effects on pigs behaviour and performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39:49-61. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(94)90015-9.
169. Wiepkema, P. R. 1983. On the significance of ethological criteria for the assessment of animal welfare. In: D. Smidt, editor, Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands. p. 71-79.
170. Zonderland, J. J., J. A. de Leeuw, C. Nolten, and H. A. M. Spoolder. 2004. Assessing long term behavioural effects of feeding motivation in group-housed pregnant sows; What, when and how to observe. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87:15-30. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.009.
171. Zurbrigg, K., and T. Blackwell. 2006. Injuries, lameness and cleanliness of sows in four-group-housing gestation facilities in Ontario. J. Swine Health Prod. 14:202-206.