The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 103, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 205-214

  Rodenburg, T Bas ^a   Koene, Paul ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aggression; Fear; Feather pecking; Group size; Stress; Tail biting

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BODY SIZE; GROUP SIZE; PIG; POULTRY; RISK FACTOR; SUBSTRATE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 33847235409     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Albers G.A.A., and van Sambeek F.M.J.P. Breeding strategies for layers in view of new technologies. Arch. Geflügelk. 66 (2002) 31
2. Allen J., and Perry G.C. Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. Br. Poult. Sci. 16 (1975) 441-451
3. Andersen I.L., Nævdal E., Bakken M., and Bøe K.E. Aggression and group size in domesticated pigs, Sus scrofa: when the winner takes it all and the loser is standing small. Anim. Behav. 68 (2004) 965-975
4. Barnett J.L., Hemsworth P.H., Winfield C.G., and Hansen C. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. I. Effects of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16 (1986) 249-257
5. Besbes B. Breeding egg type chickens to meet changing demands. Arch. Geflügelk. 66 (2002) 52
6. Bessei W. Genetische Beziehungen zwischen Leistung, Befiederung und Scheu bei Legehennen. Arch. Geflügelk. 48 (1984) 231-239
7. Bestman M.W.P., and Wagenaar J.P. Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Liv. Prod. Sci. 80 (2003) 133-140
8. Bilcík B., and Keeling L.J. Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68 (2000) 55-66
9. Bilcík B., Keeling L.J., and Newberry R.C. Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens. Behav. Processes 43 (1998) 53-59
10. Blokhuis H.J. Feather-pecking in poultry: its relation with ground-pecking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16 (1986) 63-67
11. Bolhuis J.E., Schouten W.G.P., Schrama J.W., and Wiegant V.M. Individual coping characteristics, aggressiveness and fighting strategies in pigs. Anim. Behav. 69 (2005) 1085-1091
12. Bracke M.B.M., Hulsegge B., Keeling L., and Blokhuis H.J. Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs. 1. Modelling. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87 (2004) 31-44
13. Breuer K., Sutcliffe M.E.M., Mercer J.T., Rance K.A., Beattie V.E., Sneddon I.A., and Edwards S.A. The effect of breed on the development of adverse social behaviours in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84 (2003) 59-74
14. Breuer K., Sutcliffe M.E.M., Mercer J.T., Rance K.A., O'Connell N.E., Sneddon I.A., and Edwards S.A. Heritability of clinical tail-biting and its relation to performance traits. Liv. Prod. Sci. 93 (2005) 87-94
15. Buitenhuis A.J., Rodenburg T.B., Wissink P.H., Visscher J., Koene P., Bovenhuis H., Ducro B.J., and van der Poel J.J. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between feather pecking behavior, stress response, immune response, and egg quality traits in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 83 (2004) 1077-1082
16. Collias N.E., Collias E.C., Hunsaker D., and Minning L. Locality fixation, mobility and social organization within an unconfined population of red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 14 (1966) 550-559
17. Collias N.E. The vocal repertoire of the Red Junglefowl: a spectrographic classification and the code of communication. Condor 89 (1987) 510-524
18. Cornetto T., and Estevez I. Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71 (2001) 141-153
19. Cornetto T., Estevez I., and Douglass L.W. Using artificial cover to reduce aggression and disturbances in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75 (2002) 325-336
20. Craig J.V., and Muir W.M. Selection for reduction of beak-inflicted injuries among caged hens. Poult. Sci. 72 (1993) 411-420
21. Cuthbertson G.J. Genetic variation in feather-pecking behaviour. Br. Poult. Sci. 21 (1980) 447-450
22. D'Eath R.B., and Stone R.J. Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: an experiment with coloured lighting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62 (1999) 233-242
23. D'Eath R.B., and Keeling L.J. Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: from peck orders to social tolerance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84 (2003) 197-212
24. Douglis M.B. Social factors influencing the hierarchies of small flocks of the domestic hen: interactions between resident and part-time members of organized flocks. Phys. Zool. 21 (1948) 147-182
25. Estevez I., Keeling L.J., and Newberry R.C. Decreasing aggression with increasing group size in young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84 (2003) 213-218
26. Gentle M.J. Beak trimming in poultry. W. Poult. Sci. J. 42 (1986) 268-275
27. Glatz P.C. Poultry Welfare Issues-Beak Trimming (2005), Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United Kingdom
28. Gonyou H.W. The social behaviour of pigs. In: Keeling L.J., and Gonyou H.W. (Eds). Social Behaviour of Farm Animals (2001), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom 147-176
29. Green L.E., Lewis K., Kimpton A., and Nicol C.J. Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease. Vet. Rec. 147 (2000) 233-238
30. Guhl A.M. Social behaviour of the domestic fowl. Tech. Bull. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. 73 (1953) 1-48
31. Gunnarsson S., Keeling L.J., and Svedberg J. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40 (1999) 12-18
32. Hansen I., Braastad B.O., Storbraten J., and Tofastrud M. Differences in fearfulness indicated by tonic immobility between laying hens in aviaries. Anim. Welfare 2 (1993) 105-112
33. Hocking P.M., Channing C.E., Robertson G.W., Edmond A., and Jones R.B. Between breed genetic variation for welfare-related behavioural traits in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 89 (2004) 85-105
34. Huber-Eicher B., and Sebö F. Reducing feather pecking when raising laying hen chicks in aviary systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73 (2001) 59-68
35. Hughes B.O., Carmichael N.L., Walker A.W., and Grigor P.N. Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54 (1997) 215-234
36. Hughes B.O., and Duncan I.J.H. The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. Br. Poult. Sci. 13 (1972) 525-547
37. Jones R.B. Is the experimenter an influential variable in studies in tonic immobility in the domestic fowl?. Biol. Behav. 15 (1990) 93-103
38. Keeling L.J., Estevez I., Newberry R.C., and Correia M.G. Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: the concept of problematic intermediate group sizes. Poult. Sci. 82 (2003) 1393-1396
39. Kjaer J.B., and Sørensen P. Feather pecking behaviour in White Leghorns, a genetic study. Br. Poult. Sci. 38 (1997) 333-341
40. Kjaer J.B., Sørensen P., and Su G. Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71 (2001) 229-239
41. Kjaer J.B., and Vestergaard K.S. Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62 (1999) 243-254
42. Koene P. Cannibalism in extensive poultry keeping in the Netherlands: an inventory. In: Koene P., and Blokhuis H.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the Fifth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. Wageningen, The Netherlands (1997) 147-150
43. Koene P. Stochastic catastrophe analysis of effects of density and group size on behaviour: an example in laying hens. In: Noldus L.P.J.J., Grieco F., Loijens L.W.S., and Zimmerman P.H. (Eds). Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2005. Wageningen, The Netherlands (2005) 221-224
44. Koene, P., Nijland, H., de Heer, R. Vocal expressions of density, group size and welfare in laying hens, submitted for publication.
45. Kondo S., Sekine J., Okubo M., and Asahida Y. The effect of group size and space allowance on the agonistic and spacing behavior of cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24 (1989) 127-135
46. Lindberg A.C., and Nicol C.J. Effects of social and environmental familiarity on group preferences and spacing behaviour in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49 (1996) 109-123
47. Moore A.S., Gonyou H.W., and Ghent A.W. Integration of newly introduced and resident sows following grouping. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38 (1993) 257-267
48. McGlone J.J., and Curtis S.E. Behavior and performance of weanling pigs in pens equipped with hide areas. J. Anim. Sci. 60 (1985) 20-24
49. Moinard C., Mendl M., Nicol C.J., and Green L.E. A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81 (2003) 333-355
50. Newberry R.C. Cannibalism. In: Perry G.C. (Ed). Welfare of the Laying Hen (2003), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom 239-258
51. Nicol C.J., Gregory N.G., Knowles T.G., Parkman I.D., and Wilkins L.J. Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65 (1999) 137-152
52. Nicol C.J., Lindberg A.C., Phillips A.J., Pope S.J., Wilkins L.J., and Green L.E. Influence of prior exposure to wood shavings on feather pecking, dustbathing and foraging in adult laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73 (2001) 141-155
53. Oden K., Vestergaard K.S., and Algers B. Space use and agonistic behaviour in relation to sex composition in large flocks of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67 (2000) 307-320
54. Pagel M., and Dawkins M.S. Peck orders and group size in laying hens: 'futures contracts' for non-aggression. Behav. Processes 40 (1997) 13-25
55. Pötzsch C.J., Lewis K., Nicol C.J., and Green L.E. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, management and disease. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74 (2001) 259-272
56. Preisinger R., and Schmutz M. Commercial layer breeding with special focus on alternative housing. Arch. Geflügelk. 66 (2002) 32
57. Preston A.P., and Murphy L.B. Movement of broiler chickens reared in commercial conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 30 (1989) 519-532
58. Price E.O., and Wallach S.J. Effects of group size and the male-to-female ratio on the sexual performance and aggressive behavior of bulls in serving capacity tests. J. Anim. Sci. 69 (1991) 1034-1040
59. Rizvi S., Nicol C.J., and Green L.E. Risk factors for vulva biting in breeding sows in south-west England. Vet. Rec. 143 (1998) 654-658
60. Rodenburg T.B., Buitenhuis A.J., Ask B., Uitdehaag K.A., Koene P., van der Poel J.J., and Bovenhuis H. Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response in laying hens at two different ages. Poult. Sci. 82 (2003) 861-867
61. Rodenburg T.B., Buitenhuis A.J., Ask B., Uitdehaag K.A., Koene P., van der Poel J.J., van Arendonk J.A.M., and Bovenhuis H. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between feather pecking and open-field response in laying hens at two different ages. Behav. Genet. 34 (2004) 407-415
62. Savory C.J. Feather pecking and cannibalism. W. Poult. Sci. J. 51 (1995) 215-219
63. Savory C.J., Mann J.S., and Macleod M.G. Incidence of pecking damage in growing bantams in relation to food form, group size, stocking density, dietary tryptophan concentration and dietary protein source. Br. Poult. Sci. 40 (1999) 579-584
64. Schmolke S.A., Li Y.Z., and Gonyou H.W. Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 81 (2003) 874-878
65. Schrøder-Petersen D.L., and Simonsen H.B. Tail biting in pigs. Vet. J. 162 (2001) 196-210
66. Simonsen H.B. Behaviour and distribution of fattening pigs in the multi-activity pen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27 (1990) 311-324
67. Su G., Kjaer J.B., and Sørensen P. Variance components and selection response for feather-pecking behavior inlaying hens. Poult. Sci. 84 (2005) 14-21
68. Takeda K., Sato S., and Sugawara K. Familiarity and group size affect emotional stress in Japanese Black heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82 (2003) 1-11
69. Turner S.P., Horgan G.W., and Edwards S.A. Effect of social group size on aggressive behaviour between unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74 (2001) 203-215
70. Van Krimpen M.M., Kwakkel R.P., Reuvekamp B.F.J., van der Peet-Schwering C.M.C., Den Hartog L.A., and Verstegen M.W.A. Impact of feeding management on feather pecking in laying hens. W. Poult. Sci. J. 61 (2005) 663-685
71. Vestergaard K.S., and Lisborg L. A model of feather pecking development which relates to dustbathing in the fowl. Behaviour 126 (1993) 291-308
72. Wennrich G. Ethological studies of domestic chickens (Gallus domesticus) of different hybrid origin in floor management with special reference to aggressive behaviour as well as feather pecking and cannibalism 5. Communication: feather pecking behaviour. Arch. Geflügelk. 39 (1975) 37-44
73. Widowski T.M., and Duncan I.J.H. Do domestic fowl form groups when resources are unlimited?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44 (1995) 280
74. Zimmerman P.H., and Koene P. The effect of frustrative nonreward on vocalisations and behaviour in the laying hen, Gallus gallus domesticus. Behav. Processes 44 (1998) 73-79
75. Zimmerman, P.H., Lindberg, A.C., Pope, S.J., Glen, E., Bolhuis, J.E., Nicol, C.J. The effect of stocking density, flock size and modified management on laying hen behaviour and welfare in a non-cage system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., in press.