Influence of gestation housing on sow behavior and fertility

Journal of Swine Health and Production

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 132-136

  Jansen, Jarno ^a   Kirkwood, Roy N ^a   Zanella, Adroaldo J ^a,b   Tempelman, Robert J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Behavior; Cortisol; Fertility; Groups; Swine

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 34248587502     PISSN: 1537209X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54846/jshap/480     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1999:1067-1076.
2. Aherne FX, Kirkwood RN. Nutrition and sow prolificacy. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;33(suppl):169-183.
3. Kirkwood RN, Baidoo SK, Aherne FX. The influence of feeding level during lactation and gestation on the reproductive performance of second parity sows. Can J Anim Sci. 1990;70:1119-1126.
4. Young MG, Tokach MD, Aherne FX, Main RG, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Comparison or three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. J. Anim Sci. 2004;82:3058-3070.
5. Mendl M, Zanella AJ, Broom DM. Physiological and reproductive correlates of behavioural strategies. Anim Behav. 1992;44:1107-1121.
6. Arey DS, Edwards SA. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;56:61-70.
7. Kongsted AG. Stress and fear as possible mediators of reproduction problems in group housed sows: a review. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2004;54:58-66.
8. McGlone JJ, von Borell EH, Deen J, Johnson K, Levis DG, Meunier-Salaun N, Morrow J, Reeves D, Salak-Johson JL, Sundberg PL. Compilation of the scientific literature comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behavior, performance, and health. Prof Anim Sci. 2004;20:105-117.
9. Morris JR, Hurnik JF, Friendship RM, Evans NM. The effect of the Hurnik-Morris (HM) system on sow reproduction, attrition, and longevity. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:2759-2762.
10. Edwards SA. Scientific perspectives on loose housing systems for dry sows. Pig Vet J. 1992;28:40-51.
11. den Hartog LA, Backus GBC, Vermeer HM. Evaluation of housing systems for sows. J. Anim Sci. 1993;71:1339-1344.
12. Broom DM, Mendl MT, Zanella AJ. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim Sci. 1995;61:369-385.
13. Bates RO, Edwards DB, Korthals RL. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls. Livest Prod Sci. 2003;79:29-35.
14. Ruis MA, Te Brake JH, Engel B, Ekkel ED, Buist WG, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. The circadian rhyrhm of salivary cortisol in growing pigs: effect of age, gender, and stress. Physiol Behav. 1997;62:623-630.
15. Seguin MJ, Friendship RM, Kirkwood RN, Zanella AJ, Widowski TM. Effects of boar presence on agonistic behavior, shoulder scratches, and stress response of bred sows at mixing. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1227-1237.
16. Zanella AJ, Broom DM, Hunter J, Mendl M. Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity and housing in sows. Physiol Behav. 1996;59:769-775.
17. Turner AI, Hemsworth PH, Tilbrook AJ. Susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress and the role of the hypothalamo-pituitary- adrenal axis. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2002;14:377-391.
18. Soede NM, van Sleuwen MJW, Molenaar R, Rietveld FW, Schouten WPG, Hazeleger W, Kemp B. Influence of repeated regrouping on reproduction in gilts. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006;96:133-145.