Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: From peck orders to social tolerance

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 197-212

  D'Eath, Richard B ^a,b   Keeling, Linda J ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chickens; Group size; Laying hens; Poultry; Social behaviour; Social recognition

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; GROUP SIZE; POULTRY; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS;

AVES; GALLIFORMES; GALLUS; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 0344153349     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Allee, W.C., Collias, N.E., Lutherman, C.Z., 1939. Modification of the social order in flocks of hens by the injection of testosterone propionate. Physiol. Zool. 12, 412-440.
2. Al-Rawi, B., Craig, J.V., 1975. Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2, 69-80.
3. Al-Rawi, B., Craig, J.V., Adams, A.W., 1976. Agonistic behavior and egg production in caged layers: genetic strain and group size effects. Poult. Sci. 55, 796-807.
4. Appleby, M.C., Jenner, T.D., 1993. How animals perceive group size: aggression among hens in partitioned pens. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, Humboldt University, Berlin, pp. 243-244.
5. Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., Hogarth, G.S., 1989. Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. Br. Poult. Sci. 30, 545-553.
6. Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., Elson, H.A., 1992. Poultry Production Systems: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
7. Banks, E.M., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Hughes, B.O., Mankovich, N.J., 1979. Social rank and priority of access to resources in domestic fowl. Behav. Proc. 4, 197-209.
8. Barnard, C.J., Burk, T., 1979. Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". J. Theor. Biol. 81, 65-73.
9. Bilcík, B., Keeling, L.J., 1999. Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive pecking in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40, 444-451.
10. Bradshaw, R.H., 1991. Discrimination of group members by laying hens Gallus domesticus. Behav. Proc. 24, 143-151.
11. Bradshaw, R.H., 1992a. Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33, 69-75.
12. Bradshaw, R.H., 1992b. Individual attributes as predictors of social status in small groups of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34, 359-363.
13. Candland, D.K., Taylor, D.B., Dresdale, L., Leiphart, J.M., Solow, S.P., 1969. Heart rate, aggression and dominance in the domestic chicken. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 67, 70-76.
14. Cloutier, S., Newberry, R.C., 2000. Recent social experience, body weight and initial patterns of attack predict the social status attained by unfamiliar hens in a new group. Behaviour 137, 705-726.
15. Cloutier, S., Beaugrand, J.P., Laguë, P.C., 1995a. The effect of prior victory or defeat in the same site as that of a subsequent encounter on the determination of dyadic dominance in the domestic hen. Behav. Proc. 34, 293-298.
16. Cloutier, S., Beaugrand, J.P., Laguë, P.C., 1995b. The role of individual characteristics and of patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in triads of domestic hens. Behav. Proc. 34, 293-298.
17. Collias, N.E., 1943. Statistical analysis of factors which make for success in initial encounters between hens. Am. Nat. 77, 519-538.
18. Collias, N.E., Collias, E.C., Hunsaker, D., Minning, L., 1966. Locality fixation mobility and social organisation within an unconfined population of red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 14, 550-559.
19. Cooper, J.J., Appleby, M.C., 1996. Individual variation in prelaying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs. Br. Poult. Sci. 37, 245-253.
20. Cordiner, L.S., Savory, C.J., 2001. Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71, 305-317.
21. Craig, J.V., Guhl, A.M., 1969. Territorial behaviour and social interactions of pullets kept in large flocks. Poult. Sci. 48, 1622-1628.
22. Craig, J.V., Biswas, D.K., Guhl, A.M., 1969. Agonistic behaviour influenced by strangeness, crowding and heredity in female domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Anim. Behav. 17, 498-506.
23. Dawkins, M.S., 1982. Elusive concept of preferred group size in domestic hens. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8, 365-375.
24. Dawkins, M.S., 1990. From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behav. Brain. Sci. 13, 1-61.
25. Dawkins, M.S., 1995. How do hens view other hens? The use of lateral and binocular visual fields in social recognition. Behaviour 132, 591-606.
26. Dawkins, M.S., 1996. Distance and social recognition in hens: implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour 133, 1-18.
27. Dawkins, M.S., Woodington, A., 1997. Distance and the presentation of visual stimuli to birds. Anim. Behav. 54, 1019-1025.
28. Dawkins, M.S., Woodington, A., 2000. Pattern recognition and active vision in chickens. Nature 403, 652-655.
29. Dawson, J.S., Siegel, H.S., 1962. Influence of comb removal and testosterone on agonistic behavior in young fowl. Poult. Sci. 41, 1103-1106.
30. D'Eath, R.B., Dawkins, M.S., 1996. Laying hens do not discriminate between video images of conspecifics. Anim. Behav. 52, 903-912.
31. D'Eath, R.B., Stone, R.J., 1999. Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: an experiment with coloured lighting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62, 233-242.
32. Duncan, I.J.H., 2001. The pros and cons of cages. World Poult. Sci. J. 57, 381-390.
33. Estévez, I., Newberry, R.C., deReyna, L.A., 1997. Broiler chickens: a tolerant social system? Etologia 5, 19-29.
34. Estévez, I., Keeling, L., Newberry, R.C., 2001. Behavioral plasticity of social strategies in the domestic fowl. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Congress of the ISAE, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA, p. 212.
35. Estévez, I., Newberry, R.C., Keeling, L.J., 2002. Dynamics of aggression in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76, 307-325.
36. Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), 1991. Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens in Colony Systems. MAFF, London.
37. Gibson, S.W., Dun, P., Hughes, B.O., 1988. The performance and behaviour of laying fowls in a covered strawyard system. Res. Dev. Agric. 5, 153-163.
38. Guhl, A.M., 1968. Social inertia and social stability in chickens. Anim. Behav. 16, 219-232.
39. Guhl, A.M., Allee, W.C., 1944. Some measurable effects of social organisation in flocks of hens. Physiol. Zool. 17, 320-347.
40. Gunnarson, S., Keeling, L.J., Svedberg, J., 1999. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of mislaid eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40, 12-18.
41. Hale, E.B., 1948. Observations on the social behavior of hens following debeaking. Poult. Sci. 27, 591-592.
42. Hughes, B.O., 1977. Selection of group size by individual laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 18, 9-18.
43. Hughes, B.O., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1977. Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: the influence of housing method and group size. Anim. Behav. 25, 1056-1062.
44. Hughes, B.O., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Morley Jones, R., 1974. Spatial organisation in flocks of domestic fowls. Anim. Behav. 22, 438-445.
45. Hughes, B.O., Carmichael, N.L., Walker, A.W., Grigor, P.N., 1997. Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54, 215-234.
46. Keeling, L.J., Duncan, I.J.H., 1989. Inter-individual distances and orientation in laying hens housed in groups of three in two different sized enclosures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24, 325-342.
47. Keeling, L., Savenije, B., 1995. Flocks of commercial laying hens: organised groups of collections of individuals? In: Proceedings of the 29th International Society for Applied Ethology, UFAW, Exeter, UK, pp. 187-188.
48. Ligon, J.D., Thornhill, R., Zuk, M., Johnson, K., 1990. Male-male competition, ornamentation and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 40, 367-373.
49. Lindberg, A.C., Nicol, C.J., 1996a. Effects of social and environmental familiarity on group preferences and spacing behaviour in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49, 109-123.
50. Lindberg, A.C., Nicol, C.J., 1996b. Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 37, 709-721.
51. Lott, D.F., 1991. Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Maier, R.A., 1964. The role of the dominance-submission ritual in social recognition of hens. Anim. Behav. 12, 59.
53. Maynard Smith, J., Harper, D.G.C., 1988. The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 319, 557-570.
54. McBride, G., Foenander, F., 1962. Territorial behaviour in flocks of domestic fowls. Nature 194, 102.
55. McLean, K.A., Baxter, M.R., Michie, W., 1986. A comparison of the welfare of laying hens in battery cages and in a perchery. Res. Dev. Agric. 3, 93-98.
56. Møller, A.P., 1987. Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim. Behav. 35, 1637-1644.
57. Nicol, C.J., Gregory, N.G., Knowles, T.G., Parkman, I.D., Wilkins, L.J., 1999. Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65, 137-152.
58. Odén, K., Vestergaard, K.S., Algers, B., 2000. Space use and agonistic behaviour in relation to sex composition in large flocks of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67, 307-320.
59. O'Keefe, T.R., Graves, H.B., Siegel, H.S., 1988. Social organisation in caged layers: the peck order revisited. Poult. Sci. 67, 1008-1014.
60. Pagel, M., Dawkins, M.S., 1997. Peck orders and group size in laying hens: 'futures contracts' for non-aggression. Behav. Proc. 40, 13-35.
61. Ratner, S.C., 1961. Effect of learning to be submissive on status in the peck order of domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 9, 34-37.
62. Rushen, J., 1982. The peck orders of chickens: how do they develop and why are they linear? Anim. Behav. 30, 1129-1137.
63. Rushen, J., 1985. Explaining peck order in domestic chickens. Bird Behav. 6, 1-9.
64. Schjelderup-Ebbe, T., 1922. Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. Z. Psychol. 88, 225-252.
65. Siegel, P.B., Hurst, D.C., 1962. Social interactions among females in dubbed and undubbed flocks. Poult. Sci. 41, 141-145.
66. Smith, W., Hale, E.B., 1959. Modification of social rank in the domestic fowl. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52, 373-375.
67. Solberg, E.J., Ringsby, T.H., 1997. Does male badge size signal status in small island populations of House Sparrows, Passer domesticus? Ethology 103, 177-186.
68. Syme, G.J., Syme, L.A., Barnes, D.R., 1983. Fowl sociometry: social discrimination and the behaviour of domestic hens during food competition. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 11, 163-175.
69. Turner, S.P., Horgan, G.W., Edwards, S.A., 2001. Effect of social group size on aggressive behaviour between unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74, 203-215.
70. Whitfield, D.P., 1987. Plumage variability, status signalling and individual recognition in avian flocks. TREE 2, 13-18.
71. Williams, C., McGibbon, W.H., 1956. An analysis of the peck-order of the female domestic fowl Gallus domesticus. Poult. Sci. 35, 969-976.
72. Wilson, R.H., 1974. Agonistic postures and latency to the first interaction during initial pair encounters in the red jungle fowl, Gallus gallus. Anim. Behav. 22, 75-82.
73. Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1971. The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl. Heinemann, London.
74. Ylander, D.M., Craig, J.V., 1980. Inhibition of agonistic acts between hens by a dominant third party. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6, 63-69.