Contrastive interlanguage analysis A reappraisal

International Journal of Learner Corpus Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 7-24

  Granger, Sylviane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Comparative fallacy; Contrastive interlanguage analysis; Interlanguage variation; Native speaker; Norm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942580789     PISSN: 22151478     EISSN: 22151486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Ädel, A. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/scl.24
2. Ädel, A. 2008. “Involvement features in writing: Do time and interaction trump register awareness?” In G. Gilquin, S. Papp, & B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking Up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 33–53.
3. Aijmer, K. 2002. “Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 55–76. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.6.07aij
4. Aston, G. 2008. “It’s only Human....”. In A. Martelli & V. Pulcini (Eds.), Investigating English with Corpora: Studies in Honour of Maria Teresa Prat. Monza: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher, 343–354.
5. Aston, G. 2011. “Applied corpus linguistics and the learning experience”. In V. Viana, S. Zingier & G. Barnbrook (Eds.), Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–16. DOI: 10.1075/scl.48.01ast
6. Ballier, N. & Martin, P. forthcoming. “Speech annotation of learner corpora”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Barbieri, F. 2010. “Review of G. Gilquin, S. Papp & M. B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.) Linking Up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi (2008)”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(1), 148–150. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109990337
8. Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. “The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity”, Language Learning 33, 1–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x
9. Breckle, M. & Zinsmeister, H. 2012. “A corpus-based contrastive analysis of local coherence in L1 and L2 German”. In V. Karabalić, M. A. Varga & L. Pon (Eds.), Discourse and Dialogue Studies between Theory, Research Methods, and Application/Diskurs- und Dialogforschungen zwischen Theorie, Methodik und Anwendung. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, 235–250.
10. Brutt-Griffler, J. & Samimy, K. K. 2001. “Transcending the nativeness paradigm”, World Englishes 20(1), 99–106. DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00199
11. Callies, M. 2008. “Easy to understand but difficult to use? Raising constructions and information packaging in the advanced learner variety”. In G. Gilquin, M. B. Diez-Bedmar & S. Papp (Eds.), Linking Up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 201–226.
12. Cogo, A. & Dewey, M. 2012. Analysing English as a Lingua Franca. London and New York: Continuum.
13. Cook, V. 2012. “Nativeness and language pedagogy”. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 4173–4176.
14. Dörnyei, Z. & Skehan, P. 2003. “Individual differences in second language learning”. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden: Blackwell, 589–630. DOI: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18
15. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
16. Ferguson, G. 2009. “Issues in researching English as a lingua franca: a conceptual enquiry”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19(2), 117–135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00225.x
17. Giagkou, M., Kantzou, V., Stamouli, S. & Tzevelekou, M. 2013. “Discriminating CEFR levels in Greek L2: a corpus-based study of young learners’ written narratives”. Learner Corpus Research Conference – Book of Abstracts. Universitetet i Bergen, Norway, 49–50. Available at http://lcr2013.b.uib.no/files/2013/09/abstracts-book.pdf (accessed 15 January 2015).
18. Gilquin, G. 2002. “Automatic retrieval of syntactic structures: The quest for the Holy Grail”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2), 183–214. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.03gil
19. Gilquin, G. forthcoming. “At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide 36(1).
20. Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. 2008. “Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation”, English Text Construction 1, 41–61. DOI: 10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
21. Granger, S. 1993. “The International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Aarts, P. de Haan & N. Oostdijk (Eds.), English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 57–69.
22. Granger, S. 1996. “From CA to CIA and back: An integrated contrastive approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora”. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast. Text-based cross-linguistic studies. Lund: Lund University Press, 37–51.
23. Granger, S. 1998. “The computer learner corpus: a versatile new source of data for SLA research”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer. London and New York: Longman, 3–18.
24. Granger, S. 2002. “A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–33. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.6.04gra
25. Granger, S. 2009. “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–32. DOI: 10.1075/scl.33.04gra
26. Granger, S. 2012a. “How to use foreign and second language learner corpora”. In A. Mackey & S. G. Gass (Eds), A Guide to Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition. Malden: Basil Blackwell, 7–29.
27. Granger, S. 2012b. “Learner corpora”. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3235–3242.
28. Granger, S. & Tyson, S. 1996. “Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and nonnative EFL speakers of English”, World Englishes 15(1), 17–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x
29. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. 2009. International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook and CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
30. Hall, C. J., Wicaksono, R., Liu, S., Qian, Y. & Xiaoqing, X. 2013. English Reconceived: Raising Teachers’ Awareness of English as a ‘Plurilithic’ Resource Through an Online Course. ELT Research Papers 13-05. London: British Council. Available at http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/english-reconceived-raising-teachers%E2%80%99-awareness-english-a%E2%80%98plurilithic%E2%80%99-resource-through (accessed 14 September 2014).
31. Hasselgård, H. & Johansson, S. 2011. “Learner corpora and contrastive interlanguage analysis”. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin & M. Paquot (Eds.), A Taste for Corpora. In Honour of Sylviane Granger. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–61. DOI: 10.1075/scl.45.06has
32. Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
33. Jantunen, J. & Brunni, S. 2013. “Morphology, lexical priming and second language acquisition: a corpus-study on learner Finnish”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 235–245.
34. Johansson, S. 1991. “Times change, and so do corpora”. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. London and New York: Longman, 305–314.
35. Lardiere, D. 2003. “Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001”, Second Language Research 19(2): 129–143. DOI: 10.1191/0267658303sr216oa
36. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2014. “Another step to be taken – Rethinking the end point of the interlanguage continuum”. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage. Forty years later. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 203–220. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.39.11ch9
37. Lee, D. & Chen, S. 2009. “Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners”, Journal of Second Language Writing 18, 149–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.05.004
38. Mauranen, A. 2011. “Learners and users – Who do we want data from?” In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin & M. Paquot (Eds.), A Taste for Corpora. In honour of Sylviane Granger. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 155–171. DOI: 10.1075/scl.45.11mau
39. Möller, V. 2013. “How Do Educational Settings at the Secondary Level Impact on Learners’ Use of the English Passive? – Evidence from the Secondary-Level Corpus of Learner English (SCooLE)”. Paper presented at the Learner Corpus Research Conference, Bergen, Norway, 27-29 September 2013. http://lcr2013.b.uib.no/files/2013/10/lcr2013-slides-moeller.pdf (last accessed 15 September 2014).
40. Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. 2008. “Theorizing advancedness, setting up the longitudinal research agenda”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York and London: Routledge, 281–300.
41. Paquot, M. 2010. Academic Vocabulary in Learner Writing. From Extraction to Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.
42. Paquot, M. 2014. “Cross-linguistic influence and formulaic language. Recurrent word sequences in French learner writing”. In L. Roberts, I. Vedder & J. Hulstijn (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2014. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins, 240–261. DOI: 10.1075/eurosla.14.10paq
43. Paquot, M. & Granger, S. 2012. “Formulaic language in learner corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 130–149. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190512000098
44. Péry-Woodley, M.-P. 1990. “Contrastive discourses: Contrastive analysis and a discourse approach to writing”, Language Teaching 23, 143–151. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444800005772
45. Romaine, S. 2003. “Variation”. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden: Blackwell, 409–435.
46. Seidlhofer, B. 2001. “Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(2), 133–158. DOI: 10.1111/1473-4192.00011
47. Selinker, L. 2014. “Interlanguage 40 years on. Three themes from here”. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage. Forty years later. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 221–246. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.39.12ch1
48. Shea, M. 2009. “A corpus-based study of adverbial connectors in learner text”, MSU Working Papers in SLS 1(1), 1–13.
49. Springer, P. E. 2012. Advanced Learner Writing. A Corpus-based Study of the Discourse Competence of Dutch Writers of English in the Light of the C1/C2 Levels of the CEFR. Oisterwijk: BOXpress.
50. Strawn, B. A. 2009. “Comparative approaches: History, theory and the image of God”. In J. LeMon & K. Richards (Eds.), Method Matters: Essays on the Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Honor of David L. Petersen. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 117–142.
51. Sung Park, E. 2004. “The Comparative Fallacy in UG Studies”, Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 4(1), 1–4. Available at http://www.tc.columbia.edu/academic/tesol/wjfiles/pdf/eunsung2004.pdf (accessed 15 September 2014).
52. Tan, M. 2005. “Authentic language or language errors? Lessons from a learner corpus”, ELT Journal 59(2), 126–134. DOI: 10.1093/eltj/cci026
53. Tenfjord K., Hagen, J. E. & Johansen, H. 2006. “The Hows and Whys of coding categories in a learner corpus (or “How and why an error tagged learner corpus is not ipso facto one big comparative fallacy”)”, Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata (RiPLA) 6(3), 93–108.
54. White, L. 2003. “On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal Grammar in the Second Language”. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden: Blackwell, 19–42.