Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2654-2662

  Hervas Oliver, Jose Luis ^a,b   Sempere Ripoll, Francisca ^a   Arribas, Ivan ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d IVIE   (Spain)

^e ERI CES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Asymmetric methods; Fs QCA; Organizational innovation; Process innovation; Product innovation; Resource based view

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942372179     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Armstrong J.S. Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 2012, 28(3):689-694.
2. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17(1):99-120.
3. Battisti G., Iona A. The intra-firm diffusion of complementary innovations: Evidence from the adoption of management practices by British establishments. Research Policy 2009, 38(8):1326-1339.
4. Battisti G., Stoneman P. How innovative are UK firms? Evidence from the fourth UK community innovation survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations. British Journal of Management 2010, 21(1):187-206.
5. Boer H., During W.E. Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product, process and organizational innovation. International Journal of Technology Management 2001, 22(1-3):83-107.
6. Chung M., Woodside A.G. Causal recipes sufficient for identifying market gurus versus mavens. Fuzzy methods for customer relationship management and marketing: Applications and classification 2011, 312-331. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA. A. Meier, L. Donzé (Eds.).
7. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation - A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34(3):555-590.
8. Damanpour F. Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies 2014, 35:1265-1285.
9. Damanpour F., Walker R.M., Avellaneda C.N. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies 2009, 46(4):650-675.
10. Edquist C., Hommen L., McKelvey M. Innovation and employment: Process versus product innovation 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
11. Ettlie J.E., Reza E.M. Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35(4):795-827.
12. Evangelista R., Vezzani A. The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations: A firm-level analysis. Research Policy 2010, 39(10):1253-1263.
13. Fagerberg Jan, Mowery David C., Nightingale Paul Introduction: The heterogeneity of innovation-Evidence from the community innovation surveys. Industrial and Corporate Change 2012, 21(5):1175-1180.
14. Fiss P.C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. The Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(4):1180-1198.
15. Fiss P.C. Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal 2011, 54(2):393-420.
16. Gigerenzer Gerd From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review 1991, 98(2):254.
17. Gigerenzer G., Brighton H. Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009, 1:107-143.
18. Heidenreich M. Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy 2009, 38(3):483-494.
19. Hervas-Oliver J.L., Albors Garrigos J., Gil-Pechuan I. Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation 2011, 31(9):427-466.
20. Hervas-Oliver J.L., Sempere-Ripoll F., Boronat-Moll C. Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate?. Small Business Economics 2014, 43(4):873-886.
21. Hervas-Oliver J.L., Sempere-Ripoll F., Boronat-Moll C., Rojas R. Technological innovation without R&D: Unfolding the extra gains of management innovations on technological performance. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2015, 27(1):19-38.
22. Hervas-Oliver Jose-Luis, Sempere-Ripoll Francisca Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations. Journal of Business Research 2015, 68(1):109-118.
23. Hollen Rick, Den Bosch Van, Frans A.J., Volberda Henk W. The role of management innovation in enabling technological process innovation: An inter-organizational perspective. European Management Review 2013, 10(1):35-50.
24. Huang C., Arundel A., Hollanders H. How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption 2010, United Nations University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
25. Hudson John, Kühner Stefan Beyond indices: The potential of fuzzy set ideal type analysis for cross-national analysis of policy outcomes. Policy and Society 2013, 32(4):303-317.
26. Longest Kyle C., Vaisey Stephen Fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. Stata Journal 2008, 8(1):79.
27. McClelland D.C. Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science 1998, 9(5):331-3339.
28. Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1995, 19(2):179-208.
29. Mol M., Birkinshaw J. The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research 2009, 62(12):1269-1280.
30. Ordanini A., Parasuraman A., Rubera Gaia When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configuration. Journal of Service Research 2014, 17(2):134-149.
31. Parisi M., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. Productivity innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economic Review 2006, 50:2037-2061.
32. Peteraf M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 1993, 14(3):179-191.
33. Porter Michael E. What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review 1996, 74(6):61-78.
34. Ragin Charles C. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies 1987, University of California Press, Berkeley.
35. Ragin C. Fuzzy-set social science 2000, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Ragin C. Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis 2006, 14(3):291-310.
37. Ragin C. Redesigning social inquiry 2008, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
38. Rivkin J.W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science 2000, 46(6):824-844.
39. Roberts S., Pashler H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 2000, 107:358-367.
40. Schneider Carsten Q., Wagemann Claudius Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis 2012, Cambridge University Press, New York.
41. Siggelkow Nicolaj Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44(4):838-857.
42. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 1986, 15(6):285-305.
43. Volberda H.W., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., Heij C.V. Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review 2013, 10:1-15.
44. Wheelwright S.C., Clark K.B. Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality 1992, Free Press, New York.
45. Woodside A.G. Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis, and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research 2013, 66:463-472.
46. Woodside A.G. Proposing a new logic for data analysis in marketing and consumer behavior: Case study research of large-N survey data for estimating algorithms that accurately profile X (extremely high-use) consumers. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 2013, 22(4):277-289.
47. Woodside A.G. Embrace perform model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research 2014, 67(12):2495-2503.
48. Woodside A.G., Zhang M. Identifying X-consumers using causal recipes: 'Whales' and 'jumbo shrimps' casino gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies 2012, 28(1):13-26.
49. Wu P.-L., Yeh S.-S., Huan T.C., Woodside A. Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. Journal of Business Research 2014, 67:1647-1670.
50. Zadeh Lotfi A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 8(3):338-353.