Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 463-472

  Woodside, Arch G ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Causal recipe; Configuration; Consistency; Coverage; Fit validity; Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis; Multiple regression analysis; Predictive validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874292326     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Armstrong J.S. How to avoid exploratory research. Journal of Advertising Research 1970, 10(4):27-30.
2. Armstrong J.S. Long-Range Forecasting 1985, John Wiley, New York.
3. Armstrong, J. S. (in press). Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting.
4. CIA World Factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.
5. Cooper R.G. The NewProd System: The industry experience. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1992, 9:113-127.
6. Cooper R.G., Kleinschmidt E.J. Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. Research-Technology Management 2007, 50:52-66. (Available at: http://www.proddev.com/downloads/working_papers/wp_6.pdf).
7. Czerlinski J., Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. How good are simple heuristics?. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, 97-118. Oxford University Press, New York. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, The ABC Research Group (Eds.).
8. Gigerenzer G. From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review 1991, 98:254-267.
9. Gigerenzer G., Brighton H. Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009, 1:107-143.
10. Gladwell M. The tipping point. The New Yorker 1996, 72:32-39.
11. Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. Fast and frugal forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 2009, 25:760-772.
12. Hotchkiss E., Smith D.C., Strömberg P. Private equity and the resolution of financial distress. Journal of Finance 2012.
13. Lazarsfeld P.F. Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung 1937, 6:119-139.
14. Mauro P. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995, 110(3):681-712. 10.2307/2946696.
15. McClelland D.C. Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science 1998, 9:331-3339.
16. Pant P.N., Starbuck W.H. Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods. Journal of Management 1990, 16(2):433-460.
17. Prado A. Choosing among competing environmental and labor standards: An exploratory analysis of producer adoption. Working paper 2010, Stern School, New York University, New York, (aprado@stern.nyu.edu).
18. Ragin C. Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research 2006, 16:27-42.
19. Ragin C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond 2008, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
20. Roberts S., Pashler H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 2000, 107:358-367.
21. Woodside A.G. Responding to the severe limitations of cross-sectional surveys: Commenting on Rong and Wilkinson's perspectives. Australasian Marketing Journal 2011, 19:153-156.
22. Zellner A. Keep it sophisticatedly simple. Simplicity, inference, and modeling: Keeping it sophisticatedly simple 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. H. Keuzenkamp, M. McAleer (Eds.).