Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 293-312

  Gombolay, Matthew C ^a   Gutierrez, Reymundo A ^a   Clarke, Shanelle G ^a   Sturla, Giancarlo F ^a   Shah, Julie A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Human robot teaming; Planning and scheduling; Team performance

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ROBOT PROGRAMMING; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT; CONTROL AUTHORITIES; PLANNING AND SCHEDULING; ROBOT INTERACTIONS; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; SHARED DECISION MAKINGS; TEAM PERFORMANCE; WORKER SATISFACTION;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84941940260     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: 15737527     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-015-9457-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams, J. A. (2009). Multiple robot-single human interaction: Effects on perceived workload and performance. Behavior and Information Technology, 28(2), 183–298.
2. Alsever, J. (2011). Robot workers take over warehouses. CNN Money. Retrieved November 9, 2011 from http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/09/smallbusiness/kiva_robots/.
3. Ardissono, L., Petrone, G., Torta, G., & Segnan, M. (2012). Mixed-initiative scheduling of tasks in user collaboration. In Proceedings of WEBIST 2012—eight international conference on web information systems and technologies (pp. 342–351).
4. Barnes, M. J., Chen, J. Y. C., Jentsch, F., & Redden, E. S., (2011). Designing effective soldier–robot teams in complex environments: Training, interfaces, and individual differences. In Proceedinggs of the international conference on engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (EPCE) (pp. 484–493). Berlin: Springer.
5. Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2010). Linear programming and network flows (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
6. Berry, P., Peintner, B., Conley, K., Gervasio, M., Uribe, T., & Yorke-Smith, N. (2006). Deploying a personalized time management agent. Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS ’06 (pp. 1564–1571). New York: ACM.
7. Bertsimas, Dimitris, & Weismantel, Robert. (2005). Optimization over Integers. Belmont: Dynamic Ideas.
8. Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998). Cross-training and team performance. making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 299–311). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Casper, J., & Roberson, R. R. (2004). Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMCS), 34(2), 138–153.
10. Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., & Qu, Z. (2010). Roboleader: An agent for supervisory control of mobile robots. In Proceedings of the international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI).
11. Clare, A. S., Cummings, M. L., How, J. P., Whitten, A. K., & Toupet, O. (2012). Operator objective function guidance for a real-time unmanned vehicle scheduling algorithm. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 9(4), 161–173.
12. Cummings, M. L., Brzezinski, A. S., & Lee, J. D. (2007). Operator performance and intelligent aiding in unmanned aerial vehicle scheduling. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(2), 52–59.
13. Durfee, E. H., Boerkoel, J. C, Jr, & Sleight, J. (2013). Using hybrid scheduling for the semi-autonomous formation of expert teams. Future Generation Computer Systems, 31, 200–212.
14. Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41, 312–325.
15. Feng, S., Whitman, E., Xinjilefu, X., & Atkeson, C. G. (2015). Optimization-based full body control for the darpa robotics challenge. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(2), 293–312.
16. Fox, D. (2003). Adapting the sample size in particle filters through kld-sampling. International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), 22, 985–1003.
17. Gombolay, M. C., Wilcox, R. J., & Shah, J. A. (2013). Fast scheduling of multi-robot teams with temporospatial constrints. In Proceedings of the robots: Science and systems (RSS) (pp. 24–28). Berlin.
18. Goodrich, M. A., Morse, B. S., Engh, C., Cooper, J. L., & Adams, J. A. (2009). Towards using UAVs in wilderness search and rescue: Lessons from field trials. Interaction Studies, Special Issue on Robots in the Wild: Exploring Human-Robot Interaction in Naturalistic Environments, 10(3), 453–478.
19. Hamasaki, M., Takeda, H., Ohmukai, I., & Ichise, R. (2004). Scheduling support system for academic conferences based on interpersonal networks. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext.
20. Haynes, T., Sen, S., Arora, N., & Nadella, R. (1997). An automated meeting scheduling system that utilizes user preferences. In Proceedings of the first international conference on autonomous agents, AGENTS ’97 (pp. 308–315). New York: ACM.
21. Hebert, P., Bajracharya, M., Ma, J., Hudson, N., Aydemir, A., Reid, J., et al. (2015). Mobile manipulation and mobility as manipulationdesign and algorithms of robosimian. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(2), 255–274.
22. Hoffman, G. (2013). Evaluating fluency in human-robot collaboration. In International conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), workshop on human robot collaboration.
23. Hoffman, G., & Breazeal, C. (2007). Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork: Efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. In Proceedings of the international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 1–8).
24. Hooten, E. R., Hayes, S. T., & Adams, J. A. (2011). A comparison of communicative modes for map-based tasking. In IEEE internation conference on systems, man, and cybernetics.
25. Johnson, M., Shrewsbury, B., Bertrand, S., Wu, T., Duran, D., Floyd, M., et al. (2015). Team ihmc’s lessons learned from the darpa robotics challenge trials. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(2), 192–208.
26. Jones, H. L., Rock, S. M., Burns, D., & Morris, S. (2002). Autonomous robots in SWAT applications: Research, design, and operations challenges. AUVSI.
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1977). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. Technical Report.
28. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2004). Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems IROS 2004, Vol 4, (pp. 3559–3564).
29. Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in humanrobot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10), 962–973.
30. Macho, S., Torrens, M., & Faltings, B. (2000). A multi-agent recommender system for planning meetings. In Proceedings of workshop on agent-based recommender systems, autonomous agents 2000, ACM.
31. Mackenzie, C. F., Xiao, Y., & Horst, R. (2004). Video task analysis in high performance teams. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 6, 139–147.
32. Murphy, R. R. (2015). Meta-analysis of autonomy at the darpa robotics challenge trials. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(2), 189–191.
33. Muscettola, N., Morris, P., & Tsamardinos, I. (1998). Reformulating temporal plans for efficient execution. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR&R), Trento.
34. Nikolaidis, S., & Shah, J. (2013). Human-robot cross-training: Computational formulation, modeling and evaluation of a human team training strategy. In Proceedings of the international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 33–40).
35. Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52, 381–410.
36. Parasuraman, R., Mustapha, M., & Hilburn, B. (1999). Adaptive aiding and adpative task allocation enchance human-machine systems. Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends, 1999, 119–123.
37. Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., & Torrey, C. (2007). Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 145–152).
38. Ryan, J. C., Banerjee, A. G., Cummings, M. L., & Roy, N. (2013). Comparing the performance of expert user heuristics and an integer linear program in aircraft carrier deck operations. IEEE Transaction on Cybernetics, 9(4), 669–678.
39. Salas, E., Fowlkes, J. E., Stout, R. J., Milanovich, D. M., & Prince, C. (1999). Does CRM training improve teamwork skills in the cockpit? Two evaluation studies. Human Factors, 41, 326–343.
40. Shah, J., Wiken, J., Williams, B., & Breazeal, C. (2011). Improved human-robot team performance using chaski, a human-inspired plan execution system. In Proceedings of the international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 29–36).
41. Stentz, A., Herman, H., Kelly, A., Meyhofer, E., Clark Haynes, G., Stager, D., et al. (2015). Chimp, the cmu highly intelligent mobile platform. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(2), 209–228.
42. Volpe, C., Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas, E., & Spector, P. (1996). The impact of cross training on team functioning. Human Factors, 38, 87–100.
43. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., Shell, D. A., Matarić, M. J. (2007). Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 872–877).
44. Wilcox, R. J., Nikolaidis, S., & Shah, J. A. (2012). Optimization of temporal dynamics for adaptive human-robot interaction in assembly manufacturing. In Proceedings of robotics: science and systems (RSS) (pp. 9–13). Sydney.
45. Zhang, H., Law, E., Miller, R., Gajos, K., Parkes, D., & Horvitz, E. (2012). Human computation tasks with global constraints. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’12 (pp. 217–226). New York: ACM.