The Replication Checkpoint Prevents Two Types of Fork Collapse without Regulating Replisome Stability

Molecular Cell

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 998-1010

  Dungrawala, Huzefa ^a   Rose, Kristie L ^a   Bhat, Kamakoti P ^a   Mohni, Kareem N ^a   Glick, Gloria G ^a   Couch, Frank B ^a   Cortez, David ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; DNA; METHYLTRANSFERASE; ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN, HUMAN; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA HELICASE; DNA LIGASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; ZNF644 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; GENOME; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPLISOME; STRESS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME STABILITY; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; ENZYME STABILITY; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84941809696     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.030     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alabert C., Bukowski-Wills J.C., Lee S.B., Kustatscher G., Nakamura K., de Lima Alves F., Menard P., Mejlvang J., Rappsilber J., Groth A. Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:281-293.
2. Ammazzalorso F., Pirzio L.M., Bignami M., Franchitto A., Pichierri P. ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery. EMBO J. 2010, 29:3156-3169.
3. Bansbach C.E., Bétous R., Lovejoy C.A., Glick G.G., Cortez D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2405-2414.
4. Bétous R., Couch F.B., Mason A.C., Eichman B.F., Manosas M., Cortez D. Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1958-1969.
5. Bhat K.P., Bétous R., Cortez D. High-affinity DNA-binding domains of replication protein A (RPA) direct SMARCAL1-dependent replication fork remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290:4110-4117.
6. Bian C., Chen Q., Yu X. The zinc finger proteins ZNF644 and WIZ regulate the G9a/GLP complex for gene repression. eLife 2015, March:4.
7. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
8. Bryant H.E., Petermann E., Schultz N., Jemth A.S., Loseva O., Issaeva N., Johansson F., Fernandez S., McGlynn P., Helleday T. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2601-2615.
9. Byun T.S., Pacek M., Yee M.C., Walter J.C., Cimprich K.A. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1040-1052.
10. Carr A.M., Paek A.L., Weinert T. DNA replication: failures and inverted fusions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:866-874.
11. Charrier J.D., Durrant S.J., Golec J.M., Kay D.P., Knegtel R.M., MacCormick S., Mortimore M., O'Donnell M.E., Pinder J.L., Reaper P.M., et al. Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) protein kinase as potential anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54:2320-2330.
12. Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:616-627.
13. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4325-4336.
14. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
15. Cortez D., Glick G., Elledge S.J. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:10078-10083.
16. Couch F.B., Bansbach C.E., Driscoll R., Luzwick J.W., Glick G.G., Bétous R., Carroll C.M., Jung S.Y., Qin J., Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1610-1623.
17. Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1367-1372.
18. Cox J., Neuhauser N., Michalski A., Scheltema R.A., Olsen J.V., Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:1794-1805.
19. De Piccoli G., Katou Y., Itoh T., Nakato R., Shirahige K., Labib K. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:696-704.
20. Dimitrova D.S., Gilbert D.M. Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:686-694.
21. Dungrawala H., Cortez D. Purification of proteins on newly synthesized DNA using iPOND. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1228:123-131.
22. Fanning E., Klimovich V., Nager A.R. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:4126-4137.
23. Garcia-Higuera I., Taniguchi T., Ganesan S., Meyn M.S., Timmers C., Hejna J., Grompe M., D'Andrea A.D. Interaction of the Fanconi anemia proteins and BRCA1 in a common pathway. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:249-262.
24. Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P.A. The repair and signaling responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Adv. Genet. 2013, 82:1-45.
25. Hashimoto Y., Puddu F., Costanzo V. RAD51- and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:17-24.
26. Khurana S., Kruhlak M.J., Kim J., Tran A.D., Liu J., Nyswaner K., Shi L., Jailwala P., Sung M.H., Hakim O., Oberdoerffer P. A macrohistone variant links dynamic chromatin compaction to BRCA1-dependent genome maintenance. Cell Rep. 2014, 8:1049-1062.
27. Lecona E., Fernández-Capetillo O. Replication stress and cancer: it takes two to tango. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 329:26-34.
28. Lopez-Contreras A.J., Ruppen I., Nieto-Soler M., Murga M., Rodriguez-Acebes S., Remeseiro S., Rodrigo-Perez S., Rojas A.M., Mendez J., Muñoz J., Fernandez-Capetillo O. A proteomic characterization of factors enriched at nascent DNA molecules. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1105-1116.
29. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
30. Macheret M., Halazonetis T.D. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2015, 10:425-448.
31. Meister P., Taddei A., Vernis L., Poidevin M., Gasser S.M., Baldacci G. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 168:537-544.
32. Méndez J., Stillman B. Chromatin association of human origin recognition complex, cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins during the cell cycle: assembly of prereplication complexes in late mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:8602-8612.
33. Mohni K.N., Kavanaugh G.M., Cortez D. ATR pathway inhibition is synthetically lethal in cancer cells with ERCC1 deficiency. Cancer Res. 2014, 74:2835-2845.
34. Moldovan G.L., Pfander B., Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 2007, 129:665-679.
35. Mortusewicz O., Fouquerel E., Amé J.C., Leonhardt H., Schreiber V. PARG is recruited to DNA damage sites through poly(ADP-ribose)- and PCNA-dependent mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:5045-5056.
36. Nijman S.M., Huang T.T., Dirac A.M., Brummelkamp T.R., Kerkhoven R.M., D'Andrea A.D., Bernards R. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP1 regulates the Fanconi anemia pathway. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:331-339.
37. Bastos de Oliveira F.M., Kim D., Cussiol J.R., Das J., Jeong M.C., Doerfler L., Schmidt K.H., Yu H., Smolka M.B. Phosphoproteomics reveals distinct modes of Mec1/ATR signaling during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 2015, 57:1124-1132.
38. Petermann E., Orta M.L., Issaeva N., Schultz N., Helleday T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:492-502.
39. Ragland R.L., Patel S., Rivard R.S., Smith K., Peters A.A., Bielinsky A.K., Brown E.J. RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:2259-2273.
40. Ray Chaudhuri A., Ahuja A.K., Herrador R., Lopes M. Poly(ADP-ribosyl) glycohydrolase prevents the accumulation of unusual replication structures during unperturbed S phase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35:856-865.
41. Reaper P.M., Griffiths M.R., Long J.M., Charrier J.D., Maccormick S., Charlton P.A., Golec J.M., Pollard J.R. Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7:428-430.
42. Shibahara K., Stillman B. Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 1999, 96:575-585.
43. Sirbu B.M., Couch F.B., Feigerle J.T., Bhaskara S., Hiebert S.W., Cortez D. Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:1320-1327.
44. Sirbu B.M., Couch F.B., Cortez D. Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7:594-605.
45. Sirbu B.M., McDonald W.H., Dungrawala H., Badu-Nkansah A., Kavanaugh G.M., Chen Y., Tabb D.L., Cortez D. Identification of proteins at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) coupled with mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:31458-31467.
46. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:1323-1336.
47. Toledo L.I., Altmeyer M., Rask M.B., Lukas C., Larsen D.H., Povlsen L.K., Bekker-Jensen S., Mailand N., Bartek J., Lukas J. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 2013, 155:1088-1103.
48. Trenz K., Smith E., Smith S., Costanzo V. ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1764-1774.
49. Ueda J., Tachibana M., Ikura T., Shinkai Y. Zinc finger protein Wiz links G9a/GLP histone methyltransferases to the co-repressor molecule CtBP. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:20120-20128.
50. Van C., Yan S., Michael W.M., Waga S., Cimprich K.A. Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:233-246.
51. Yoo H.Y., Shevchenko A., Shevchenko A., Dunphy W.G. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:53353-53364.
52. Yu C., Gan H., Han J., Zhou Z.X., Jia S., Chabes A., Farrugia G., Ordog T., Zhang Z. Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall. Mol. Cell 2014, 56:551-563.
53. Zeman M.K., Cimprich K.A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:2-9.