Researching literacy in context: Using video analysis to explore school literacies

Literacy

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 140-148

  Blikstad Balas, Marte ^a   Sørvik, Gard Ove ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Literacy practices; Research methods; School literacy; Video studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941731198     PISSN: 17414350     EISSN: 17414369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lit.12037     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson, E. and Sørvik, G. O. (2013). Reality lost? Re-use of qualitative data in classroom video studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14.3. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1941.
2. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
3. Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (2000). Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge.
4. Barton, D. and Lee, C. (2013). Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
5. Blikstad-Balas, M. (2012): Digital literacy in upper secondary school: What do students use their laptops for during teacher instruction? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7.2, pp. 81-96.
6. Blikstad-BalaS, M. and Hvistendahl, R. (2013). Students' digital strategies and shortcuts. Searching for answers on Wikipedia as a core literacy practice in upper secondary school. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8.1-2, pp. 32-48.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
8. Creswell, J. W. and Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39.3, pp. 124-130.
9. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., ... Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19.1, pp. 3-53.
10. Erickson, F. (2006). 'Definition and analysis of data from videotape: some research procedures and their rationales' in J. L. Green, G. Camilli and P. B. Elmore (Eds.) Complementary Methods for Research in Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, pp. 177-192.
11. Flewitt, R. (2006). Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: education research assumptions and methodological practices. Visual Communication, 5.1, pp. 25-50.
12. Gee, J. P. (2000). 'Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading', in M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson and R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research Vol. 3, Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 195-207.
13. Gee, J. P. (2001). 'Reading, language abilities, and semiotic resources: beyond limited perspectives on reading', in J. Larson (Ed.) Literacy as Snake Oil: Beyond the Quick Fix, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 7-26.
14. Gough, P. B. and Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7.1, pp. 6-10.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). 'Things and relations: regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge', in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (Eds.) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, London: Routledge, pp. 185-235.
16. Hamilton, M. (2000). 'Expanding the new literacy studies: using photographs to explore literacy as social practice', in D. Barton, M. Hamilton and R. Ivanič (Eds.) Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, London: Routledge, pp. 16-34.
17. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., ... Yore, L. D. (2003) Message from the "Island group": what is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40.7, pp. 607-615.
18. Haw, K. and Hadfield, M. (2011). Video in Social Science Research: Functions and Forms. London: Routledge.
19. Heath, C., Hindmars, J. and Luff, P. (2010). Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
20. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32.1, pp. 241-267.
21. Klette, K. (2003). Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97. [Practices in the classroom after the reform of 1997]. Oslo, Norway: UniPub Forlag.
22. Klette, K. (2009). 'Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from PISA+ study: a video study of teaching and learning in Norway', in T. Janik and T. Seidel (Eds.) The Power of Video Studies in Studies of Teaching and Learning, Münster: Waxmann Verlag, pp. 61-82.
23. Klette, K., Lie, S., Ødegaard, M., Anmarkrud, Ø., Bergem, O. K., Arnesen, N. E. and Roe, A. (2008). PISA+: Lærings- og undervisningsstrategier i skolen [PISA+: Learning and teaching strategies in school]. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council.
24. Lahlou, S. (2011). How can we capture the subject's perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50.3-4, pp. 607-655.
25. Laurier, E. and Philo, C. (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H. G. Soeffner and B. Schnettler (Eds.) Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 181-190.
26. Lemke, J. L. (2004). 'The literacies of science', in E. W. Saul (Ed.) Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, pp. 33-47.
27. Maybin, J. (2007). Literacy under and over the desk: oppositions and heterogeneity. Language and Education, 21.6, pp. 515-530.
28. Norris, S. P. and Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87.2, pp. 224-240.
29. Ødegaard, M. and Arnesen, N. E. (2010). Hva skjer i naturfagklasserommet? - resultater fra en videobasert klasseromsstudie; PISA+[What happens in the science classroom? Results from a video-based classroom study: PISA+]. Nordic Studies in Science Education 6.1, pp. 16-32.
30. Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. M. and Sørvik, G. O. (2013). Data as the Force? Challenges and support in an integrated science and literacy teaching model. Paper presented at 10th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). 2. - 7. September, 2013, Nicosia, Cyprus.
31. Speer, S. A. and Hutchby, I. (2003). From ethics to analytics: aspects of participants' orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology, 37.2, pp. 315-337.
32. Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R. and Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35.2, pp. 87-100.
33. Street, B. V. and Lefstein, A. (2007). Literacy: An Advanced Resource Book, London: Routledge.
34. Sørvik, G. O., Blikstad-Balas, M. and Ødegaard, M. (forthcoming). "Do books like these have authors?" New roles for text and new demands on students in integrated science-literacy instruction. Science Education.