Reality lost? Re-use of qualitative data in classroom video studies

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Andersson, Emilia ^a   Sørvik, Gard Ove ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Archived data; Classroom studies; Norway; Reuse; Secondary analysis; Video data; Video studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881058233     PISSN: 14385627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Andersson, Emilia & Klette, Kirsti (Forthcoming). Teachers use of questions and responses to students contributions during whole class discussions: Comparing language art and science classrooms. In Kirsti Klette, Ole Kristian Bergem & Astrid Roe (Eds.), Videos as windows into classroom learning-international practices in language arts, mathematics and science classrooms. Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Bergem, Ole Kristian & Klette, Kirsti (2010). Mathematical tasks as catalysts for student talk: Analyzing discourse in a Norwegian mathematics classroom. In Yoshinori Shimizu, Berinderjeet Kaur, Rongjin Huang & David Clarke (Eds.), Mathematical tasks in classroom around the world (pp.35-62). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
3. Bergman, Manfred Max & Eberle, Thomas S. (Eds.) (2005). Qualitative inquiry: Research, archiving, and reuse. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/12 [Date of access: May 15, 2012].
4. Bishop, Libby (2005). Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner. Sociology, 39(2), 333-336.
5. Bishop, Libby (2006). A proposal for archiving context for secondary analysis. Methodological Innovations Online, 1(2), 10-20.
6. Bishop, Libby (2007). A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: Beyond primary/secondary dualism. Sociological Research Online, 12(3), 2, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html [Date of access: May 15, 2012].
7. Broom, Alex; Cheshire, Lynda & Emmison, Michael (2009). Qualitative researchers' understandings of their practice and the implications for data archiving and sharing. Sociology, 43(6), 1163-1180.
8. Collins, Allan; Joseph, Diana & Bielaczyc, Katerine (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
9. Coltart, Carrie; Henwood, Karen & Shirani, Fiona (2013). Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: Ethical, professional and methodological considerations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1), Art. 18, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1301181 [Date of access: April 21, 2013].
10. Corti, Louise (2000). Progress and problems of preserving and providing access to qualitative data for social research-the international picture of an emerging culture. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 2, http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1019 [Date of access: March 2, 2012].
11. Corti, Louise (2007). Re-using archived qualitative data-where, how, why? Archival Science, 7(1), 37-54.
12. Corti, Louise (2011). The European landscape of qualitative social research archives: Methodological and practical issues. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103117 [Date of access: April 20,2013].
13. Corti, Louise & Backhouse, Gill (2005). Acquiring qualitative data for secondary analysis. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2) Art. 36, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502361 [Date of access: April 4, 2012].
14. Corti, Louise & Bishop, Libby (2005). Strategies in teaching secondary analysis of qualitative data. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art. 47, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/509/1098 [Date of access: June 7, 2012].
15. Corti, Louise & Thompson, Paul (2004). Secondary analysis of archive data. In Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber. F. Gubrium & David Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp.327-343). London: Sage.
16. Corti, Louise; Day, Annette & Backhouse, Gill (2000). Confidentiality and informed consent: Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art 7, http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1024/2207 [Date of access: May 5, 2012].
17. Corti, Louise; Foster, Janet & Thompson, Paul (1995). Archiving qualitative research data. Social Research Update, 10, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html [Date of access: September 10, 2010].
18. Corti, Louise; Witzel, Andreas & Bishop, Libby (Eds.) (2005). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/13 [Date of access: April 15, 2012].
19. Dalland, Cecilie P. (2011). Utfordringer ved gjenbruk av andres kvalitative data [Challenges in the re-use of others' qualitative data]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidskrift, 6, 449-457.
20. Dalland, Cecilie P. & Klette, Kirsti (2012). Work-plan heroes: Student strategies in lower secondary Norwegian classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, iFirst Article, 1-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.739200 [Date of access: July 5, 2013].
21. Derry, Sharon J.; Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E.; Nagarajan, Anandi; Chernobilsky, Ellina & Beitzel, Brian D. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 145-162.
22. Derry, Sharon J.; Pea, Roy D.; Barron, Brigid; Engle, Randi A.; Erickson, Frederick; Goldman, Ricki; Hall, Rogers; Koschmann, Timothy; Lemke, Jay L.; Sherin, Miriam G. & Sherin, Bruce L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.
23. Erickson, Frederick (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In Judith L. Green, Gregory Camilli & Patricia B. Elmore (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp.177-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
24. Fielding, Nigel (2004). Getting the most from archived qualitative data: epistemological, practical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(1), 97-104.
25. Furtak, Erin M. & Shavelson, Richard J. (2009). Guidance, conceptual understanding, and student learning: An investigation of inquiry-based teaching in the US. In Tomas Janìk & Tina Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp.181-206). Münster: Waxmann.
26. Grossman, Pam & McDonald, Morva (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
27. Hammersley, Martyn (1997). Qualitative data archiving: Some reflections on its prospects and problems. Sociology, 31(1), 131-142.
28. Hammersley, Martyn (2010). Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive Issues. Sociological Research Online, 15(1), 5, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html [Date of access: March 2, 2012].
29. Heath, Christian (2011). Embodied action: Video and the analysis of social interaction. In David Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp.250-270). London: Sage.
30. Heaton, Janet (1998). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Research Update, 22, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html [Date of access: September 10, 2010].
31. Hinds, Pamela S.; Vogel; Ralph J. & Clarke-Steffen, Laura (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408-424.
32. Humphrey, Charles K.; Estabrooks, Carole A.; Norris, Judy R.; Smith, Jane E. & Hesketh, Kathryn L. (2000). Archivist on board: Contributions to the research team. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 5, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs000356 [Date of access: June 7, 2012].
33. Irwin, Sarah & Winterton, Mandy (2011). Debates in qualitative secondary analysis: Critical reflections. Timescapes Working Paper Series. No. 4, http://www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/WP4-March-2011.pdf [Date of access: April 25, 2013].
34. Janík, Tomas; Seidel, Tina & Najvar, Petr (2009). Introduction: On the power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning. In Tomas Janík & Tina Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp.7-22). Münster: Waxmann.
35. Klette, Kirsti (2009). Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from the PISA+ study: A video study of teaching and learning in Norway. In Tomas Janìk & Tina Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp.61-82). Münster: Waxmann.
36. Klette, Kirsti; Lie, Svein; Anmarkrud, Øistein; Arnesen, Nina; Bergem, Ole Kristian; Ødegaard, Marianne & Zachariassen, Jo-Rasmus H. (2005). Categories for video analysis of classroom activites with a focus on the teacher. Oslo: Institute of Educational Research & Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo, http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/forskning/prosjekter/pisa-pluss/kodeskjema/felleskoder-engelsk.pdf [Date of access: April 20, 2011].
37. Klette, Kirsti; Lie, Svein; Ødegaard, Marianne; Anmarkrud, Øistein; Bergem, Ole Kristian; Arnesen, Nina Elisabeth & Roe, Astrid (2008). PISA+: Lærings- og undervisningsstrategier i skolen [PISA+: Learning and teaching strategies in school]. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council.
38. Knoblauch, Hubert; Schnettler, Bernt & Raab, Jürgen (2006). Video-analysis. Methodological aspects of interpretive audiovisual analysis in social research. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video-analysis. Methodology and methods, (pp.9-28). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
39. Knoblauch, Hubert; Baer, Alejandro; Laurier, Eric; Petschke, Sabine & Schnettler, Bernt (2008). Visual analysis. New developments in the interpretive analysis of video and photography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 14, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803148 [Date of access: April 20, 2013].
40. Lemke, Jay L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
41. Lyng, Selma T. (2004). Være eller lære? Om elevroller, identitet og læring i ungdomsskolen [To be or to learn? Student roles, identity, and learning in lower secondary school]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
42. Mauthner, Natasha S.; Parry, Odette & Backett-Milburn, Kathryn (1998). The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data. Sociology, 32(4), 733-745.
43. Moore, Niamh (2007). (Re)using qualitative data? Sociological Research Online, 12(3), 1, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html [Date of access: June 7, 2012].
44. National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway (2006). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities, Oslo, http://www.etikkom.no/en/In-English/Publications [Date of access: August 17, 2011].
45. Olsen, Rolf Vegar (2005). Achievement tests from an item perspective. An exploration of single item data from the PISA and TIMSS studies, and how such data can inform us about students' knowledge and thinking in science. Oslo: Unipub.
46. Parry, Odette & Mauthner, Natasha S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Sociology, 38(1), 139-152.
47. Parry, Odette & Mauthner, Natasha S. (2005). Back to basics: Who re-uses qualitative data and why? Sociology, 39(2), 337-342.
48. Pea, Roy D. & Hay, Kenneth (2003). Report to the National Science Foundation: CILT Workshop on digital video inquiry in learning and education, November 25-26, 2002 (based on NSF #0124012). Stanford: Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning.
49. Schnettler, Bernt & Raab, Jürgen (2008). Interpretative visual analysis. Developments, state of the art and pending problems. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 31, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1149 [Date of access: April 20, 2013].
50. Seale, Clive (2011). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. In David Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp.347-364). London: Sage.
51. Seidel, Tina; Prenzel, Manfred; Schwindt, Katharina; Rimmele, Rolf; Kobarg, Mareike & Dalehefte, Inger M. (2009). The link between teaching and learning-investigating effects of physics teaching on student learning in the context of the IPN video study. In Tomas Janík & Tina Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp.161-180). Münster: Waxmann.
52. Silverman, David (2005). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 30, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/6/13 [Date of access: April 20, 2013].
53. Svenkerud, Sigrun; Klette, Kirsti & Hertzberg, Frøydis (2012). Opplæring i muntlige ferdigheter [Oral skills training]. Nordic Studies in Education, 32(1), 35-49.
54. Svennevig, Jan; Tønnesson, Johan; Svenkerud, Sigrun & Klette, Kirsti (2012). Retoriske ressurser I elevers muntlige framføringer [Rhetorical resources in students' oral presentations]. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 60, 68-89.
55. Szabo, Vivian & Strang, Vicki R. (1997). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2), 66-74.
56. Thompson, Paul (2000). Re-using qualitative research data: A personal account. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 27, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003277 [Date of access: July 21, 2012].
57. Valles, Miguel S., Corti, Louise; Tamboukou, Maria & Baer, Alejandro (Eds.) (2011). Qualitative archives and biographical research methods. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/38 [Date of access: April 18, 2013].
58. Wortham, Stanton E.F. (2005). Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 95-112.
59. Ødegaard, Marianne (2010). Forskerføtter og leserøtter - sentrale didaktiske prinsipper [Budding Science and Literacy-central educational principles]. In Marianne Ødegaard & Merethe Frøyland (Eds.), Utforskende naturfag inne og ute [Inquiry-based science in and outside of the classroom] (pp.4-12). Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Science Education, http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=1509695 [Date of access: August 25, 2011].
60. Ødegaard, Marianne & Klette, Kirsti (2012). Teaching activities and language use in science classrooms: Categories and levels of analysis as tools for interpretation. In Doris Jorde & Justin Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrospective and prospective (pp.181-202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
61. Ødegaard, Marianne; Mork, Sonja M.; Haug, Berit & Sørvik, Gard Ove (2012). Categories for video analysis of science lessons. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Science Education, http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/buddingscience [Date of access: November 25, 2012].
62. Ødegaard, Marianne; Andersen, Hanne M.; Schoultz, Jan; Hultman, Glenn; Nielsen, Birgitte L.; Löfgren, Ragnhild & Mork, Sonja M. (2011). EXPLORA: Koding av elevers og læreres samtaler ved praktisk arbeid i skandinaviske klasserom [EXPLORA: Coding student and teacher discourse during practical work in Scandinavian science classrooms]. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Science Education, http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=1703795 [Date of access: March 12, 2012].