Students' digital strategies and shortcuts

Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 32-48

  Blikstad Balas, Marte ^a   Hvistendahl, Rita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Assessment; Digital literacy; School tasks; Wikipedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883147666     PISSN: 08096724     EISSN: 1891943X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexa Traffic Rank (2013). Alexa Top 500 Global Sites, retrieved from: http://www.alexa.com/ topsites
2. Alexandersson, M., & Limberg, L. (2004). Textflytt och sökslump: informationssökning via skolbibliotek. Stockholm, Myndigheten för skolutveckling.
3. Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & D. P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 2 (pp. 951-983). New York: Longman.
4. Bachmann, K. E. (2004). Læreboken i reformtider - et verktøy for endring? I. Imsen, G. (red.). Det ustyrlige klasserommet. Om styring, samarbeid og læringsmiljø i grunnskolen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
5. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
6. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
7. Blikstad-Balas, M. (2013) "Et svar på nesten alt" - om elevers bruk av Wikipedia som faglig kilde i videregående skole. Norsklæreren 2013; Volum 13.(1) s. 34-43
8. Brox, H. (2012). The elephant in the room: A place for Wikipedia in higher education? Nordlit, 30, 143-155.
9. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
10. Cuban, L. (1983). How did teachers teach, 1890-1980. Theory into Practice, 22(3), 159-165.
11. Egeberg, G., Gudmunsdóttir, G. B., Hatlevik, O. E., Ottestad, G., Skaug, J. H. & Tømte, K. (2012). Monitor 2011. Skolens digitale tilstand. Senter for IKT i utdanningen. Oslo:
12. Eijkman, H. (2010). Academics and Wikipedia: Reframing Web 2.0+ as a disruptor of traditional academic power-knowledge arrangements. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(3), 173-185.
13. Erstad, O. (2006). ôA new direction?.ôEducation and Information Technologies 11.3-4. 415-429.
14. Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662-1674.
15. Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
16. Frønes, T. S., Narvhus, E., & Jetne, Ø. (2011). Elever på nett. Digital lesing i PISA 2009. Oslo: Uio
17. Furberg, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2012). Faktaorientering og forståelsesorientering i elevers bruk av nettbaserte læringsomgivelser. In T. E. Hauge & A. Lund (Eds.). Små skritt eller store sprang? Om digitale tilstander i skolen. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. Chapter 2. pp. 23-57.
18. Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge.
19. Gee, J. P. (2011) How to do discourse analysis. A toolkit. New York: Routledge.
20. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Hatlevik, O. E., Ottestad, G., Skaug, J. H., Kløvstad, V., & Berge, O. (2009). ITU MONITOR 2009: skolens digitale tilstand. Senter for IKT i utdanningen. Oslo.
22. Head, A., & Eisenberg, M. (2010). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3).
23. Håland, E. (2007). Må ha det, bare må ha det. Om fenomenet Learning Management System (LMS). Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2, 4-22
24. Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students evaluating internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 75-95.
25. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
26. Lajoie, S. P. & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. H. Winne & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 803-821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Leno, K. (2006). Reading the Web - Students' perceptions about the internet. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 541-557.
28. Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2189-2212.
29. Livingstone, S. M. (2009). Children and the Internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge: Polity.
30. Livingstone, S. M. & Bober, M. (2004). Taking up opportunities? Children's uses of the Internet for education, communication and participation. E-Learning, 1(3), 395-419.
31. Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 387-412.
32. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMMS 2011 International Results in Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.
33. Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091.
34. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
35. Raine, L. & Tancer, B. (2007). Wikipedia users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Wikipedia-users.aspx
36. Rambøll Management. (2005). Kartlegging av læremidler og læremiddelpraksis. Rapport til København.
37. Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2007). College students' credibility judgments in the information seeking process. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 49-72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Rogne, M. (2009). Læreboka - ein garantist for læreplannær undervisning? Norskbøkene i møte med eit nytt hovudområde. Acta Didactica Norge, 3(1).
39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer(Ed.), Cambridge Handbook ofthe Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Shenton, A. K. & Dixon, P. (2004). Issues arising from youngsters' information-seeking behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 26(2), 177-200.
41. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
42. Wade, S. E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, D. B. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 3 (pp. 609-627). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Walton, M., & Archer, A. (2004). The Web and information literacy: Scaffolding the use of web sources in a project-based curriculum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 173-186.
44. Whitmire, E. (2004). The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and their information-seeking behavior. Information Processing & Management, 40(1), 97- 111.
45. Yore, L. D. (1991). Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 55-72.
46. Zickuhr, K., & Raine, L. (2011). Wikipedia, past and present. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/ PIP_Wikipedia