An overview of SNP interactions in genome-wide association studies

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 143-155

  Li, Pei ^a   Guo, Maozu ^b   Wang, Chunyu ^b   Liu, Xiaoyan ^b   Zou, Quan ^a  

^a XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Data simulation; Detection methods; Genome wide association studies; SNP interactions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MODEL; SAMPLE SIZE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; LOGIC; MULTIFACTOR DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; LOGIC; MULTIFACTOR DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84941641093     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elu036     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 2005;308:385-9.
2. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009;461:747-53.
3. Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, et al. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet 2007;39:645-9.
4. Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, et al. Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease. Nat Genet 2008;40:955-62.
5. Harold D, Abraham R, Hollingworth P, et al. Genomewide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet 2009;41:1088-93.
6. Drögemüller C, Karlsson EK, Hytönen MK, et al. A mutation in hairless dogs implicates FOXI3 in ectodermal development. Science 2008;321:1462-2.
7. Wiik AC, Wade C, Biagi T, et al. A deletion in nephronophthisis 4 (NPHP4) is associated with recessive cone-rod dystrophy in standard wire-haired dachshund. Genome Res 2008;18:1415-21.
8. Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Moore SS. Whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism associations with feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2010; 88:16-22.
9. Abasht B, Sandford E, Arango J, etal. Extent and consistency of linkage disequilibrium and identification of DNA markers for production and egg quality traits in commercial layer chicken populations. BMC Genomics 2009;10(Suppl. 2):S2.
10. Cheng L, Hou ZG, Lin Y, et al. Recurrent neural network for non-smooth convex optimization problems with application to the identification of genetic regulatory networks. IEEETransNeuralNetw 2011;22:714-26.
11. Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene. Science 2006;314:1461-3.
12. Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS. A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest 2008;118:1590.
13. Donnelly P. Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans. Nature 2008;456:728-31.
14. Jakobsdottir J, Gorin MB, Conley YP, etal. Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000337.
15. Maher B. The case of the missing heritability. Nature 2008; 456:18-21.
16. Musani SK, Shriner D, Liu N, et al. Detection of gene× gene interactions in genome-wide association studies of human population data. HumHered 2007;63:67-84.
17. Marchini J, Donnelly P, Cardon LR. Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat Genet 2005;37:413-7.
18. Cordell HJ. Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:2463-8.
19. Moore JH. A global view of epistasis. Nat Genet 2005;37: 13-4.
20. Moore JH, Williams SM. Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics. AmJ Hum Genet 2009;85:309-20.
21. Greene CS, Penrod NM, Williams SM, et al. Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture. PLoS One 2009;4:e5639.
22. Zubenko GS, Hughes HB, III, Stiffler JS. D10S1423 identifies a susceptibility locus for Alzheimer's disease in a prospective, longitudinal, double-blind study of asymptomatic individuals. Mol Psychiatry 2001;6:413-9.
23. Milne RL, Herranz J, Michailidou K, et al. A large-scale assessment of two-way SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility using 46, 450 cases and 42, 461 controls from the breast cancer association consortium. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23:1934-46.
24. Chuang LY, Lin YD, Chang HW, et al. SNP-SNP Interaction Using Gauss Chaotic Map Particle Swarm Optimization to Detect Susceptibility to Breast Cancer. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2014. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2014:2548-54.
25. Becker T, Schumacher J, Cichon S, et al. Haplotype interaction analysis of unlinked regions. Genet Epidemiol 2005;29: 313-22.
26. Greliche N, Germain M, Lambert JC, etal. A genome-wide search for common SNP x SNP interactions on the risk of venous thrombosis. BMCMed Genet 2013;14:36.
27. Moore JH, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM. Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010;26:445-55.
28. Hoban S, Bertorelle G, Gaggiotti OE. Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:110-22.
29. Carvajal-Rodríguez A. Simulation of genomes: a review. Curr Genomics 2008;9:155.
30. Hoggart CJ, Chadeau-Hyam M, Clark TG, et al. Sequencelevel population simulations over large genomic regions. Genetics 2007;177:1725-31.
31. Wu X, Dong H, Luo L, et al. A novel statistic for genomewide interaction analysis. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1001131.
32. Bateson W. Mendel's principles of heredity. AmJ Med Sci 1914;148:747.
33. Fisher RA. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinburgh 1919;52:399-433.
34. Zou Q, Li X, Jiang W, et al. Survey of Mapreduce frame operation in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2014;15:637-47.
35. Cockerham CC. An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 1954;39:859.
36. Phillips PC. The language of gene interaction. Genetics 1998;149:1167-71.
37. Yuan X, Miller DJ, Zhang J, et al. An overview of population genetic data simulation. JComput Biol 2012;19:42-54.
38. Mailund T, Schierup MH, Pedersen CNS, et al. CoaSim: a flexible environment for simulating genetic data under coalescent models. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:252.
39. Liang L, Zöllner S, Abecasis GR. Genome: a rapid coalescent-based whole genome simulator. Bioinformatics 2007;23: 1565-7.
40. Chen GK, Marjoram P, Wall JD. Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data. Genome Res 2009;19:136-42.
41. Peng B, Kimmel M. simuPOP: a forward-time population genetics simulation environment. Bioinformatics 2005;21: 3686-7.
42. Neuenschwander S, Guillaume F, Goudet J. quantiNemo: an individual-based program to simulate quantitative traits with explicit genetic architecture in a dynamic metapopulation. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1552-3.
43. Edwards TL, Bush WS, Turner SD, et al. Generating linkage disequilibrium patterns in data simulations using genome SIMLA. Evolutionary Computation, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008:24-35.
44. Spencer CCA, Su Z, Donnelly P, et al. Designing genomewide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip. PLoS Genet 2009;5: e1000477.
45. Li C, Li M. GWAsimulator: a rapid whole-genome simulation program. Bioinformatics 2008;24:140-2.
46. Wright FA, Huang H, Guan X, et al. Simulating association studies: a data-based resampling method for candidate regions or whole genome scans. Bioinformatics 2007;23: 2581-8.
47. Kingman JFC. The coalescent. Stoch Process Their Appl 1982; 13:235-48.
48. Kingman JFC. Origins of the coalescent: 1974-1982. Genetics 2000;156:1461-3.
49. Slatkin M. Simulating genealogies of selected alleles in a population of variable size. Genet Res 2001;78: 49-57.
50. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 1985;111:147-64.
51. Peng B, Amos CI. Forward-time simulation of realistic samples for genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:442.
52. Moore JH, Ritchie MD. The challenges of whole-genome approaches to common diseases. JAMA 2004;291: 1642-3.
53. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, etal. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. AmJ Hum Genet 2001;69:138-47.
54. Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, LeBlanc LM. Exploring interactions in high-dimensional genomic data: an overview of logic regression, with applications. JMultivarAnal 2004;90: 178-95.
55. Herold C, Steffens M, Brockschmidt FF, et al. INTERSNP: genome-wide interaction analysis guided by a priori information. Bioinformatics 2009;25:3275-81.
56. Yang C, He Z, Wan X, et al. SNPHarvester: a filteringbased approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 504-11.
57. Wan X, Yang C, Yang Q, et al. BOOST: a fast approach to detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case-control studies. AmJHum Genet 2010;87:325-40.
58. Wang Y, Liu X, Robbins K, et al. AntEpiSeeker: detecting epistatic interactions for case-control studies using a twostage ant colony optimization algorithm. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:117.
59. Schüpbach T, Xenarios I, Bergmann S, et al. FastEpistasis: a high performance computing solution for quantitative trait epistasis. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1468-9.
60. Ma L, Runesha HB, Dvorkin D, et al. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:315.
61. Wang Z, Wang Y, Tan KL, et al. eCEO: an efficient Cloud Epistasis computing model in genome-wide association study. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1045-51.
62. Greene CS, Sinnott-Armstrong NA, Himmelstein DS, et al. Multifactor dimensionality reduction for graphics processing units enables genome-wide testing of epistasis in sporadic ALS. Bioinformatics 2010;26:694-5.
63. Hu XH, Liu Q, Zhang Z, et al. SHEsisEpi, a GPUenhanced genome-wide SNP-SNP interaction scanning algorithm. Cell Res 2010;20:854-7.
64. Lunetta KL, Hayward LB, Segal J, etal. Screening large-scale association study data: exploiting interactions using random forests. BMCGenet 2004;5:32.
65. Bureau A, Dupuis J, Falls K, et al. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet Epidemiol 2005;28:171-82.
66. Zhang Y, Liu JS. Bayesian inference of epistatic interactions in case-control studies. Nat Genet 2007;39:1167-73.
67. Patel JL, Goyal RK. Applications of artificial neural networks in medical science. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2007;2: 217-26.
68. Tomita Y, Tomida S, Hasegawa Y, et al. Artificial neural network approach for selection of susceptible single nucleotide polymorphisms and construction of prediction model on childhood allergic asthma. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:120.
69. Chen L, Ying Z, Ji Q, et al. Hierarchical classification of protein folds using a novel ensemble classifier. PLoS One 2013;8:e56499.
70. He H, Oetting WS, Brott MJ, et al. Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction and penalized logistic regression for detecting gene-gene interaction in a case-control study. BMCMed Genet 2009;10:127.
71. Moore JH, White BC. Exploiting expert knowledge in genetic programming for genome-wide genetic analysis. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN IX. Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, 2006:969-77.
72. Lee SY, Chung Y, Elston RC, et al. Log-linear modelbased multifactor dimensionality reduction method to detect gene-gene interactions. Bioinformatics 2007;23: 2589-95.
73. Lou XY, Chen GB, Yan L, et al. A generalized combinatorial approach for detecting gene-by-gene and gene-by-environment interactions with application to nicotine dependence. Am J Hum Genet 2007;80:1125-37.
74. Pattin KA, Moore JH. Exploiting the proteome to improve the genome-wide genetic analysis of epistasis in common human diseases. Hum Genet 2008;124:19-29.
75. Velez DR, White BC, Motsinger AA, et al. A balanced accuracy metric for epistasis modeling in imbalanced datasets using multifactor dimensionality reduction. Genet Epidemiol 2007;31:306-15.
76. Namkung J, Kim K, Yi S, et al. New evaluation measures for multifactor dimensionality reduction classifiers in gene-gene interaction analysis. Bioinformatics 2009;25:338-45.
77. Park MY, Hastie T. Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions. Biostatistics 2008;9:30-50.
78. Chen L, Yu G, Miller DJ, et al. A ground truth based comparative study on detecting epistatic SNPs. IEEEInternational Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshop, 2009. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2009:26-31.
79. Kooperberg C, Ruczinski I. Identifying interacting SNPs using Monte Carlo logic regression. Genet Epidemiol 2005; 28:157-70.
80. Fritsch A, Ickstadt K. Comparing logic regression based methods for identifying SNP interactions. Bioinformatics Research and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007:90-103.
81. Schwender H, Ickstadt K. Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Biostatistics 2008;9:187-98.
82. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. AmJ Hum Genet 2007;81:559-75.
83. Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M. Increasing the power of identifying gene× gene interactions in genome-wide association studies. Genetic Epidemiol 2008;32:255-63.
84. Mao Y, London NR, Ma L, etal. Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended Kempthorne model. Physiol Genomics 2007;28:46.
85. Van Steen K. Travelling the world of gene-gene interactions. Brief Bioinformatics 2012;13:1-19.