Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a datex ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 316-322

  Qiao, Hui ^a   Zhang, Jun ^a   Liang, Wei Min ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cardiopulmonary; flow velocity waveform; fluid balance

Indexed keywords

ETOMIDATE; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PHENYLEPHRINE; SEVOFLURANE; SUXAMETHONIUM; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTICLE; CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA; CRANIOTOMY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EPENDYMOMA; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; GLIOMA; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMANGIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENINGIOMA; METASTASIS; MONITOR; NEURINOMA; NEUROMONITORING; NEUROSURGERY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TIDAL VOLUME; VALIDITY;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CRANIOTOMY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 77957550121     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181e41299     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rooke GA, Schwid HA, Shapira Y. The effect of graded hemorrhage and intravascular volume replacement on systolic pressure variation in humans during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg. 1995; 80: 925-932.
2. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M., et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 984-989.
3. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger T., et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 1399-1404.
4. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D., et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162: 134-138.
5. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C., et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159: 935-939.
6. Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E., et al. Influence of systolic pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101: 194-199.
7. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VOS, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007; 11: R100.
8. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H., et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest. 2004; 126: 1563-1568.
9. Tran H, Froese N, Dumont G., et al. Variation in blood pressure as a guide to volume loading in children following cardiopulmonary bypass. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007; 21: 1-6.
10. Mallat J, Pironkov A, Destandau M.S., et al. Systolic pressure variation (Deltadown) can guide fluid therapy during pheochromo-cytoma surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50: 998-1003.
11. Gouvea G, Gouvea FG Measurement of systolic pressure variation on a Datex AS/3 monitor. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 1864.
12. Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 100: 245-250.
13. Durga P, Jonnavittula N, Muthuchellappan R., et al. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009; 21: 161-164.
14. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O., et al. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106: 1195-1200.
15. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O., et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108: 513-517.
16. Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf M.W., et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation devise. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106: 867-872.
17. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Aneasth. 2009; 102: 47-54.
18. Compton FD, Zykunft B, Hoffman C., et al. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac putput monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 100: 451-456.
19. Marx G, Cope T, McGrossan L., et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004; 21: 132-138.
20. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for rediction of fluid responsivenss in patients undergoing off-pump coronary bypass grafting. Chest. 2005; 128: 848-854.
21. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S., et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93: 782-788.
22. Kubitz JC, Forkl S, Annecke T., et al. Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 1520-1524.
23. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S., et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33: 2339-2343.
24. Critchley LA, Critchley JA A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999; 15: 85-91.
25. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2008; 74: 123-135.
26. Monnet X, Teboul JL Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007; 13: 549-553.
27. Natalini G, Rosano A, Franceschetti M.E., et al. Variations in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103: 1182-1188.
28. Sakka SG, Becher L, Kozieras J., et al. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009; 26: 322-327.