Attributional life cycle assessment: is a land-use baseline necessary?

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1364-1375

  Soimakallio, Sampo ^a   Cowie, Annette ^b   Brandão, Miguel ^c   Finnveden, Göran ^d   Ekvall, Tomas ^e   Erlandsson, Martin ^e   Koponen, Kati ^f   Karlsson, Per Erik ^e  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^c IEA Bioenergy Task 38   (Spain)

^d ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^e IVL SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^f VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Absolute emission; Attributional LCA; Baseline; Environmentally relevant physical flow; Land use; Natural regeneration

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTIONAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM REGENERATION; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 84941315145     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: 16147502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0947-y     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Arm M, Wik O, Engelse CJ, Erlandsson M, Sundqvist J, Oberender A, Hjelmar O, Wahlström M (2014) ENCORT-CDW: evaluation of the European recovery target for construction and demolition waste. Nordic Working Papers, 2014:916
2. Baumann H, Tillman A (2004) The Hitch Hiker's guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and applications. Studentlitteratur, Lund
3. Beccali M, Cellura M, Finocchiaro P, Guarino F, Longo S, Nocke B (2014) Life cycle performance assessment of small solar thermal cooling systems and conventional plants assisted with photovoltaics. Sol Energy 104:93–102
4. Bellassen V, Luyssaert S (2014) Carbon sequestration: managing forests in uncertain times. Nature 506:153–155
5. Brandão M (2012) Food, feed, fuel, timber or carbon sink? towards sustainable land use: a consequential life cycle approach. PhD thesis. Centre for Environmental Strategy (Division of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering), Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, UK. 246 pp. Appendices 541 pp
6. Brandão M, i Canals LM (2013) Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1243–1252
7. Brander M, Wylie C (2011) The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. GGMM:1–6. doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670
8. Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchinson C, Davis G (2009) Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. http://ecometrica.com/white-papers/consequential-and-attributional-approaches-to-lca-a-guide-to-policy-makers-with-specific-reference-to-greenhouse-gas-lca-of-biofuels/. Accessed 24 May 2014
9. Brander M, Wylie C, Gillenwater M (2012) Substitution: a problem with current life cycle assessment standards (p. 3). http://ecometrica.com/white-papers/substitution-a-problem-with-current-life-cycle-assessment-standards/. Accessed 12 June 2014
10. BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 - Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/forms/PASs/PAS-2050/. Accessed 4 June 2014
11. Cellura M, Longo S, Marsala G, Mistretta M, Pucci M (2013) The use of genetic algorithms to solve the allocation problems in the life cycle inventory. In: Assessment and simulation tools for sustainable energy systems. Springer, pp 267–284
12. 2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 3:413–426
13. Cherubini F, Jungmeier G, Bird DN (2012) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and energy analysis of a bioethanol oriented biorefinery based on wood. In: IEA Bioenergy Task (Vol. 38). task38.org/Bioref_Case_Study_T38_Long_v4_clean.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2014
14. Cherubini F, Guest G, Strømman AH (2013) Bioenergy from forestry and changes in atmospheric CO 2: reconciling single stand and landscape level approaches. J Environ Manag 129:292–301
15. Chiarucci A, Araújo MB, Decocq G, Beierkuhnlein C, Fernández-Palacios JM (2010) The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? J Veg Sci 21:1172–1178
16. Curran MA, Mann M, Norris G (2002) Report on the international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. EPA/600/R-02/041. Cincinnati, OH: US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory. March. nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1001NRO.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2014
17. Curran MA, Mann M, Norris G (2005) The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. J Clean Prod 13:853–862
18. de Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2013) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1216–1230
19. EC-JRC-IES (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance. First edition. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?page_id=86. Accessed 15 May 2014
20. Ekvall T (2002) Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond. J Clean Prod 10:403–406
21. Ekvall T, Andrae A (2006) Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders (10 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:344–353
22. Ekvall T, Tillman A (1997) Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:155–162
23. Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:161–171
24. Elshout P, van Zelm R, Balkovic J, Obersteiner M, Schmid E, Skalsky R, van der Velde M, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels. Nature Clim Change 5:604--610
25. Erlandsson M, Almemark M (2009) Background data and assumptions made for an LCA on creosote poles, working report. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. 16 October 2009. http://www.ivl.se/download/18.7df4c4e812d2da6a416800072055/B1865.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2014
26. EU (2009) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. 2009/28/EC. The Official Journal of the European Union 05/06/2009
27. Evangelisti S, Lettieri P, Borello D, Clift R (2014) Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. Waste Manag 34:226–237
28. Evangelisti S, Lettieri P, Clift R, Borello D (2015) Distributed generation by energy from waste technology: a life cycle perspective. Process Saf Environ Protect 93:161–172
29. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21
30. Goel P (2013) Land use in LCA: a critical analysis. Master's thesis, Leiden University
31. Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:311–313
32. Guinée J, Kleijn R, Henriksson P (2010) Environmental life cycle assessment of South-East Asian aquaculture systems for tilapia, pangasius, catfish, penaeid shrimp and macrobrachium prawns. Goal & Scope Definition Report-Final version.Sustaining Ethical Aquaculture Trade (SEAT) Deliverable Ref: D 2
33. Guo M, Li C, Bell JNB, Murphy RJ (2011) Influence of agro-ecosystem modeling approach on the greenhouse gas profiles of wheat-derived biopolymer products. Environ Sci Technol 46:320–330
34. Haberl H (2013) Net land-atmosphere flows of biogenic carbon related to bioenergy: towards an understanding of systemic feedbacks. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5:351–357
35. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12942–12947
36. Heath LS, Maltby V, Miner R, Skog KE, Smith JE, Unwin J, Upton B (2010) Greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the US forest products industry value chain. Environ Sci Technol 44:3999–4005
37. Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2014) Life cycle impact assessment. Life Cycle Assess (LCA):90
38. Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992) Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide and backgrounds. NOH reports 9266 & 9267 Leiden: CML 96pp + 130pp Guide: ISBN: 90-5191-064-9Backgrounds: ISBN: 90-5191-064-9
39. Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Pajula T (2013) Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - A review. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5:475–486
40. Helin T, Salminen H, Hynynen J, Soimakallio S, Huuskonen S, Pingoud K (2015) Global warming potentials of stemwood used for energy and materials in Southern Finland: differentiation of impacts based on type of harvest and product lifetime. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12244
41. Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment - A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Dissertation or Thesis
42. Holtsmark B (2012) Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Clim Chang 112:415–428. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0222-6
43. Holtsmark B (2013) The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO 2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5:467–473
44. Huijbregts M (2002) Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:173–173
45. ISO (2006) 14040:2006. Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 20 p
46. Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–626
47. Jury C, Benetto E, Koster D, Schmitt B, Welfring J (2010) Life cycle assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. Biomass Bioenergy 34:54–66
48. Kaufman AS, Meier PJ, Sinistore JC, Reinemann DJ (2010) Applying life-cycle assessment to low carbon fuel standards--How allocation choices influence carbon intensity for renewable transportation fuels. Energ Policy 38:5229–5241
49. Kendall A (2012) Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1042–1049
50. Koellner T (2013) Ecosystem services and global trade of natural resources: ecology, economics and policies. Routledge
51. Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, i Canals LM, Saad R, de Souza DM, Müller-Wenk R (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1188–1202
52. Koponen K, Soimakallio S, Tsupari E, Thun R, Antikainen R (2013) GHG emission performance of various liquid transportation biofuels in Finland in accordance with the EU sustainability criteria. Appl Energy 102:440–448
53. Kuczenski B, Geyer R (2011) Life cycle assessment of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) beverage bottles consumed in the State of California. Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management UC Santa Barbara. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Documents/1487/20141487.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2014
54. Kurz WA, Dymond C, Stinson G, Rampley G, Neilson E, Carroll A, Ebata T, Safranyik L (2008) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–990
55. Leinonen I, Williams AG, Kyriazakis I (2014) Evaluating methods to account for the greenhouse gas emissions from land use changes in agricultural LCA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. LCA Food 2014, pp 8–10
56. Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B (eds) (2002) Impact assessment of resources and land use. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer EW, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002), Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC, Pensacola, USA, pp 11–64
57. Lindholm E (2010) Energy use and environmental impact of roundwood and forest fuel production in Sweden. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
58. Malça J, Freire F (2011) Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: a review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:338–351
59. Marland G, Schlamadinger B, Leiby P (1997) Forest/biomass based mitigation strategies: does the timing of carbon reductions matter? Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:213–226
60. Mattila T, Helin T, Antikainen R, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Wessman H (2011) Land use in life cycle assessment. The Finnish Environment 24. Finnish Environment Institute
61. Michelsen O (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains–methodological development with regulatory and organizational implications. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Dissertation or Thesis, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse
62. Milà i Canals L, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandão M (2006) Expert workshop on land use impacts in life cycle assessment. 12–13 June 2006 Guildford, Surrey (UK). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:363–368
63. Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Knuchel RF, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Mueller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007a) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:5–15
64. Milà i Canals L, Romanya J, Cowell SJ (2007b) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of 'fertile land' in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440
65. Milà i Canals L, Rigarlsford G, Sim S (2013) Land use impact assessment of margarine. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1265–1277
66. Minkkinen K, Korhonen R, Savolainen I, Laine J (2002) Carbon balance and radiative forcing of Finnish peatlands 1900–2100–the impact of forestry drainage. Glob Chang Biol 8:785–799
67. Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Nguyen TLT, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2014) Method for calculating carbon footprint of cattle feeds–including contribution from soil carbon changes and use of cattle manure. J Clean Prod 73:40–51
68. Muys B (2002) Reference system. In: Schweinle J (ed) The assessment of environmental impacts caused by land use in the life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products. Final report. Working group 2, land use of COST action E9. Nr. 209. BFH, Hamburg, pp 56
69. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI) (2013) A review of biomass carbon accounting methods and implications. Technical Bulletin No. 1015. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
70. Núñez M, Pfister S, Antón A, Muñoz P, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Rieradevall J (2013) Assessing the environmental impact of water consumption by energy crops grown in Spain. J Ind Ecol 17:90–102
71. Nuss P, Bringezu S, Gardner KH (2012) Waste-to-materials: the longterm option. In: Waste to energy. Springer, pp 1–26
72. Oyewole A (2010) Implementation of land use and land use change and its effects on biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Master thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
73. Pelletier N, Ardente F, Brandão M, De Camillis C, Pennington D (2015) Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:74–86
74. Rajagopal D, Zilberman D (2013) On market-mediated emissions and regulations on life cycle emissions. Ecol Econ 90:77–84
75. Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt WP, Suh S, Weidema BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment: part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720
76. Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2011) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 3:107–115
77. Rödl A (2012) IEA bioenergy task 38 - case study environmental assessment of liquid biofuel from woody biomass. Work Report of the Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics 2012/01. Hamburg
78. Rutland CT (2011) Life cycle assessment applied to 95 representative US Farms. Master thesis, Texas A&M University
79. Samuel-Fitwi B, Nagel F, Meyer S, Schroeder J, Schulz C (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of raising rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in different production systems. Aquacult Eng 54:85–92
80. Schäfer F, Blanke M (2012) Farming and marketing system affects carbon and water footprint–a case study using Hokaido pumpkin. J Clean Prod 28:113–119
81. Schmidt JH (2007) Life assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Ph. D. thesis, Part 3: life cycle inventory of rapeseed oil. Dissertation, Aalborg University
82. Schulze E, Körner C, Law BE, Haberl H, Luyssaert S (2012) Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 4:611–616
83. Scown CD (2010) Life-cycle water impacts of US transportation fuels. Dissertation, University of California
84. Sheehan JJ (2009) Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:318–324
85. Socolow R (1997) Industrial ecology and global change. Cambridge University Press
86. Sonnemann G, Vigon B (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. A basis for greener processes and products.UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Paris
87. Thomassen M, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, de Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:339–349
88. Tillman A (2000) Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:113–123
89. Tufvesson LM, Lantz M, Börjesson P (2013) Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed–life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards. J Clean Prod 53:214–223
90. Vázquez-Rowe I, Marvuglia A, Flammang K, Braun C, Leopold U, Benetto E (2014) The use of temporal dynamics for the automatic calculation of land use impacts in LCA using R programming environment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:500–516
91. Vellinga TV, Blonk H, Marinussen M, van Zeist W, de Boer I, Starmans D (2009) Methodology used in FeedPrint: a tool quantifying greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Lelystad, the Netherlands
92. Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:11–33
93. Weidema B (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment (Vol. 863, p. 365). Miljøstyrelsen
94. Weidema B, Frees N, Nielsen A (1999) Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:48–56
95. Weiss F, Leip A (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: a life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:124–134
96. Whittaker C, Borrion AL, Newnes L, McManus M (2014) The renewable energy directive and cereal residues. Appl Energy 122:207–215
97. WRI, WBCSD (2011) Product life cycle reporting and standard. WRI, Washington
98. Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:904–918