Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible?

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 74-86

  Pelletier, Nathan ^a   Ardente, Fulvio ^a   Brandão, Miguel ^b   De Camillis, Camillo ^a   Pennington, David ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Attributional; Consequential; Economic allocation; ISO 14044; LCA; Multi functionality; Physical allocation; System expansion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTIONAL DATA MODELING; CONSEQUENTIAL DATA MODELING; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ALLOCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY AND INDUSTRIAL PHENOMENA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTI FUNCTIONALITY DECISION HIERARCHY; NATURAL SCIENCE; PHYSICAL ALLOCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEM EXPANSION AND SUBSTITUTION;

EID: 84922073369     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: 16147502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0812-4     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ADEME (2010) BP X30-323 - Repository of Good practices. French agency for the environment and energy management, Paris
2. Andrae A, Andersen O (2010) Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics—are they consistent? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):827–836
3. Ardente F, Cellura M (2012) Economic allocation in life cycle assessment. The state of the art and discussion of examples. J Ind Ecol 16(3):387–398
4. Ayer N, Tyedmers P, Pelletier N, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):480–7
5. Beccali M, Cellura M, Iudicello M, Mistretta M (2010) Life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products: sensitivity analysis and improvement scenarios. J Environ Manag 91(7):1415–1428
6. Brandão M (2012) Food, feed, fuel, timber or carbon sink? Towards sustainable land-use systems—a consequential life-cycle approach. Centre for Environmental Strategy, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences. Guildford, UK, University of Surrey. PhD
7. Brander M, Wylie C (2011) The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. GHG Meas Manag 1(3–4):161–6
8. EC (2010) The International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Publications office of the European Union, Luxemburg
9. EC (2013a) Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) Guide. Directorate General - Joint Research Centre, European Commission
10. EC (2013b) Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide. Directorate General - Joint Research Centre - European Commission
11. Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L (2010) Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand: Comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Publications office of the European Union, Luxemburg
12. Ekvall T, Andrae A (2006) Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(5):344–353
13. Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2001) Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review. J Clean Prod 9(3):197–208
14. Ekvall T, Tillman A-M (1997) Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:155–162
15. Ekvall T, Weidema B (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171
16. ETSI (2011) ETSI TS 103 199 V1.1.1 Environmental Engineering (EE); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; general methodology and common requirements. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103100_103199/103199/01.01.01_60/ts_103199v010101p.pdf
17. Finnveden G, Lindfors L-G (1998) Data quality of life cycle inventory data—rules of thumb. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:65–66
18. Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making: Scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. 3-9520661-3-3. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland
19. Frischknecht R (2000) Allocation in life cycle inventory analysis for joint production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(2):85–95
20. Guinée J (ed) (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: Guide. IIb: Operational annex. III: Scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
21. Guinée J et al (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):311–3
22. Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huppes G (2004) Economic allocation: examples and derived decision tree. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(1):23–33
23. Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2007) Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manag 27(8):997–1005
24. Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK, Pease WS (2000) A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment. Recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. J Ind Ecol 4(1):13–28
25. Huppes G (1993) Macro-environmental policy: principles and design: with cases on milk packaging, cadmium, phosphorus and nitrogen, and energy and global warming. CML Publisher, Leiden
26. Huppes G, Schneider F (1994) Proceedings of the European workshop on allocation in life cycle assessment. Leiden University, Netherlands
27. ISO (2006a) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland
28. ISO (2006b) ISO 14040: Environmental management —life cycle assessment—principles and framework. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland
29. ISO (2012) ISO/TR 14049: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply IS0 14044 to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland
30. Kloepffer W (1996) Allocation rule for open-loop recycling in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(1):27–31
31. Kløverpris J et al (2008) Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption. Part 1: conceptual analysis and methodological proposal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(1):13–21
32. Lund H et al (2010) Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:260–271
33. Lundie S, Dennien G, Morain M, Jones M (2007) Generation of an industry-specific physico-chemical allocation matrix. Application in the dairy industry and implications for systems analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(2):107–117
34. Mathiesen B, Munster M, Fruergaard T (2009) Uncertainties related to identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 17(15):1331–1338
35. Mendoza A, van Ruijven T, Vad K, Wardenaar T (2008) The allocation problem in bio-electricity chains. Report of a Project Group as part of the MSc. Leiden, The Netherlands: Industrial Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML)
36. Niederl-Schmidinger A, Narodoslawsky M (2008) Life cycle assessment as an engineer’s tool? J Clean Prod 16(2):245–252
37. OECD (1998) Final guidance document for distinguishing waste from non-waste. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
38. Peereboom E, Kleijn R, Lemkowitz S, Lundie S (1999) Influence of inventory data sets on life-cycle assessment results: a case study on PVC. J Ind Ecol 2(3):109–130
39. Pelletier N (2010) What’s at steak? Ecological economic sustainability, and the ethical, environmental, and policy implications for global livestock production. PhD thesis, Dalhousie University, Canada
40. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2010) Life cycle assessment of frozen tilapia fillets from Indonesian lake-based and pond-based intensive aquaculture systems. J Ind Ecol 14(3):467–481
41. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2011) An ecological economic critique of the use of market information in life cycle assessment research. J Ind Ecol 15(3):342–54
42. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2012) Response to Weinzettel. J Ind Ecol 16(3):456–458
43. Pelletier N, Allacker K, Pant R, Manfredi S (2014) The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint Method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:387–404
44. Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 1: goal & scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):290–300
45. Schau E, Fet A (2008) LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):255–264
46. Thrane M (2006) LCA of Danish fish products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):66–74
47. Tillman AM (2000) Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ Imp Assess 20:113–123
48. Tillman AM et al (1994) Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 2(1):21
49. UNEP/SETAC (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases—a basis for greener processes and products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme, Paris
50. Van der Voet E, Lifset R, Luo L (2010) Life-cycle assessment of biofuels, convergence and divergence. Biofuels 1(3):435–449
51. Wardenaar T, van Ruijven T, Mendoza Beltran A, Vad K, Guinéen J, Heijungs R (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(8):1059–1067
52. Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co-product allocation in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(3):11–33
53. Weidema B (2014) Has ISO 14040/44 failed its role as a standard for life cycle assessment? J Ind Ecol 18:324–326
54. Weidema B, Schmidt J (2010) Avoiding allocation in life cycle assessment revisited. J Ind Ecol 14(2):192
55. Weidema B, Frees N, Nielsen A-M (1999) Marginal production technologies in life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:48–56
56. Weinzettel J (2012) Understanding who is responsible for pollution: what only the market can tell us—comment on “An ecological economic critique of the use of market information in life cycle assessment research.”. J Ind Ecol 16(3):455–456
57. Werner F, Richter K (2000) Economic allocation in LCA—a case study about aluminium window frames. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(2):79–83
58. WRI/WBCSD (2011) GHG Protocol - Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), USA
59. Zamagni S, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):904–918
60. Ziegler F, Winther U, Skontorp Hognes E, Emanuelsson A, Sund V, Ellingsen H (2012) The carbon footprint of Norwegian seafood products on the global seafood market. J Indust Ecol 17(1):103–116