Applying life-cycle assessment to low carbon fuel standards-how allocation choices influence carbon intensity for renewable transportation fuels

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 5229-5241

  Kaufman, Andrew S ^a   Meier, Paul J ^a   Sinistore, Julie C ^a,b   Reinemann, Douglas J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Ethanol; LCA

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; ETHANOL; ETHANOL FUELS; FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GASOLINE; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); GREENHOUSE GASES;

ALLOCATION DECISION; BIO-ENERGY; CORN STOVER ETHANOL; ENERGY INDEPENDENCE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); MULTIPLE ALLOCATION; REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS;

LIFE CYCLE;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; ENERGY POLICY; ETHANOL; GAS PRODUCTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

UNITED STATES;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77953366257     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., Wallace, B., 2002. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing cocurrent dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover (NREL/TP-510-32438). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Accessed November 2009: 〈http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/32438.pdf〉.
2. Beer, T., Grant, T., 2007. Life-cycle analysis of emissions from fuel ethanol and blends in Australian heavy and light vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 833-837.
3. Bjorklund, A., 2002. Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7, 64-72.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board (CARB), 2009. Proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard: vol. 1. CaARB, Sacramento, CA. Accessed November 2009: 〈http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2009/lcfs09/lcfsisor1.pdf〉.
5. Curran, M., 2007. Studying the effect on system preference by varying coproduct allocation in creating life-cycle inventory. Environmental Science and Technology 41, 7145-7151.
6. Curran, M., Mann, M., Norris, G., 2005. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycel inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (8), 853-862.
7. Data Transmission Network, 2009. Ethanol Center; DTN: Omaha NE, Accessed February 2009: 〈http://www.dtnethanolcenter.com/〉.
8. Economic Research Service, 2008. Farm Business and Household Survey Data. Accessed November 2008: 〈http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/arms/app/Crop.aspx〉.
9. Ekvall, T., Tillman, A., 1997. Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2, 155-162.
10. Ekvall, T., Andrae, A., 2006. Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of shift to lead-free solders. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11, 344-353.
11. Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G., 2001. Allocation in ISO 14041-a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 9, 197-208.
12. Elmore, R., 1982. How a Corn Plant Develops (SR0048). Iowa State Extension Publication, Ames, IA.
13. Farrell, A., Plevin, R., Turner, B., Jones, A., O'Hare, M., Kammen, D., 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311, 506-508.
14. Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., van der Voet, E., 2009. A greenhouse gas indicator for bioenergy: some theoretical issues with practical implications. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14, 328-339.
15. Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Tiffany, D., 2006. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 11206-11210.
16. International Organization for Standardization, 2006a. ISO 14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principals and Framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. International Organization for Standardization, 2006b. ISO 14044: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
18. Izaurralde, R., Williams, J., McGill, W., Rosenberg, N., Quiroga Jakas, M., 2006. Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecological Modeling 192, 362-384.
19. James, L., Swinton, S., Thelen, K., 2010. Profitability analysis of cellulosic energy crops compared with corn. Agronomy Journal 102, 675-687.
20. Kaiser, R., 2005. Utilizing the Growing Local Supply of Distillers Grains. Accessed February 2008: 〈http://www.uwex.edu/ces/dairynutrition/pubs.cfm〉.
21. Kim, S., Dale, B., 2002. Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7, 237-243.
22. Kim, S., Dale, B., Jenkins, R., 2009. Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14, 160-174.
23. Kodera, K., 2007. Analysis of allocation methods of bioethanol LCA. M.Sc. Thesis, CML, Leiden University, Netherlands.
24. Liska, A., Yang, H., Bremer, V., Walters, D., Erickson, G., Klopfenstein, T., Kenney, D., Tracy, P., Koelsch, R., Cassman, K., 2007. BESS: Biofuel Energy Systems Simulator: Life-Cycle Energy and Emissions Analysis Model for Corn-Ethanol Biofuel (Version 2008.3.0 for non-commercial use), University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
25. Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., Udo de Haes, H., 2009. Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14, 529-539.
26. Malca, J., Freire, F., 2006. Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): assessing the implications of allocation. Energy 31, 3362-3380.
27. Meier, P., 2002. Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, pp. 59-66.
28. Meier, P., Erickson, J., Mapp, J., 2005. Measuring emission benefits with integrated resource models-why simple estimates of emission reductions may be wrong. In: Proceedings of the International Energy Program Evaluation Conference (IEPEC), pp. 659-670.
29. Mendoza, A., van Ruijven, T., Vad, K., Wardenaar, T., 2008. The allocation problem in bio-electricity chains. M.Sc. Thesis, Industrial Ecology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
30. Penn State University Cooperative Extension, 2009. Coping with High Energy Prices Heat Energy Content of Shelled Corn. State College, PA.
31. Pordesimo, L., Edens, W., Sokhansanj, S., 2004. Distribution of aboveground biomass in corn stover. Biomass and Bioenergy 26, 337-343.
32. Robertson, G., Paul, E., Harwood, R., 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289 (5486), 1922-1925.
33. Sheehan, J., Aden, A., Paustian, K., Killian, K., Brenner, J., Walsh, M., Nelson, R., 2004. Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7, 117.
34. Sinistore, J., 2008. Corn ethanol production in the Wisconsin agricultural context: energy efficiency, greenhouse gas neutrality and soil and water implications. M.S. Thesis, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
35. Sissine, F., 2007. Energy independence and security act of 2007: a summary of major provisions (RL34294). CRS Report for Congress, Washington DC. Accessed November 2009: 〈http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL34294_20071221.pdf〉.
36. Thomassen, M., Dalgaard, R., Heijungs, R., de Boer, I., 2008. Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13, 339-349.
37. Tillman, A., 2000. Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20, 113-123.
38. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2008. National Agriculture Statistics Service. Accessed November 2008: 〈http://www.nass.usda.gov〉.
39. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2009a. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Biomass Feedstock Composition and Property Database. Accessed March 2009: 〈http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/feedstock_databases.html〉.
40. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2009b. Energy Information Administration. Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers: Total by End-Use Sector. Accessed February 2009: 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html〉.
41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2009. U.S. EPA MARKAL 9-Region Database (version 1.1). U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle, NC, 2009.
42. Wang, M., 2009. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model (Version 1.8b). Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory/Department of Energy, Argonne, IL.
43. Weidema, B., 2001. Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 (3), 11-33.
44. West, T., Marland, G., 2002. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 91, 217-232.
45. Williams, J., Izaurralde, R., Steglich, E., 2008. Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender Model. Theoretical Documentation, Version 0604 (BREC Report #2008-17). AgriLife Research, Texas A&M System, Blackland Research and Extension, Temple, TX, 130 pp.
46. Wu, M., Wang, M., Huo, H., 2006. Fuel Cycle Assessment of Selected Bioethanol Production Pathways in the United States (ANL/ESD/06-7). Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.