Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: Between-task logical recoding

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1239-1254

  Treccani, Barbara ^a,b   Milanese, Nadia ^c   Umiltà, Carlo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Between task transfer effects; Logical recoding; Simon effect; SNARC effect; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOGIC; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVERSAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957326603     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019239     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ansorge U., Wühr P. A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2004, 30:365-377.
2. Dehaene S., Bossini S., Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:31-396.
3. Dehaene S., Dupoux E., Mehler J. Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:626-641.
4. De Jong R. Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica 1995, 88:187-207.
5. De Jong R., Liang C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:731-750.
6. Eimer M. Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:837-854.
7. Fias W., Fischer M.H. Spatial representation of numbers. Handbook of mathematical cognition 2005, 43-54. Psychology Press, New York, NY. J.I.D. Campbell (Ed.).
8. Fias W., Lauwereyns J., Lammertyn J. Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 12:415-423.
9. Fitts P.M., Seeger C.M. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1953, 46:199-210.
10. Gevers W., Ratinckx E., De Baene W., Fias W. Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:58-68.
11. Gevers W., Verguts T., Reynvoet B., Caessens B., Fias W. Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:32-44.
12. Hedge A., Marsh N.W.A. The effects of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica 1975, 39:427-439.
13. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research 1993, 55:270-279.
14. Keus I.M., Schwarz W. Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response related origin. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33:681-695.
15. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
16. LeMay R.P., Simon J.R. Temporal and symbolic S-R compatibility in a sequential information-processing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 80:558-560.
17. Lu C.H., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1995, 2:174-207.
18. Marble J.G., Proctor R.W. Mixing location-relevant and location irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1515-1533.
19. Meiran N. Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A:1023-1041.
20. Nicoletti R., Anzola G., Luppino G., Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:664-673.
21. Notebaert W., De Moor W., Gevers W., Hartsuiker R.J. New visuospatial associations by training verbospatial mappings in the first language. Psychonomic-Bulletin-and-Review 2007, 14:1183-1188.
22. Notebaert W., Gevers W., Verguts T., Fias W. Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: The reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1197-1207.
23. Proctor R.W., Lu C.H. Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effect in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:63-77.
24. Proctor R.W., Marble J.G., Vu K.-P.L. Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effect of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research 2000, 64:11-24.
25. Proctor R.W., Pick D.F. Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect. Acta Psychologica 2003, 112:259-278.
26. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Eliminating, magnifying and reversing spatial compatibility effects whit mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action 2002, 443-473. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
27. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Action selection. Handbook of psychology: Experimental psychology 2003, 4:293-316. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. R.W. Proctor, A.F. Healy (Eds.).
28. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and practice 2006, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
29. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L., Marble J.G. Mixing location-relevant and irrelevant tasks: Spatial compatibility effects eliminated by stimuli that share the same spatial codes. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:15-50.
30. Proctor R.W., Yamaguchi M., Vu K.-P.L. Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:245-253.
31. Simon J.R., Sly P.E., Vilapakkam S. Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica 1981, 47:63-81.
32. Simon J.R., Small A.M. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology 1969, 53:433-435.
33. Stoffer T., Umiltà C. Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility 1997, 181-208. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. B. Hommel, W. Prinz (Eds.).
34. Tagliabue M., Zorzi M., Umiltà C. Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect. Memory and Cognition 2002, 30:18-23.
35. Tagliabue M., Zorzi M., Umiltà C., Bassignani F. The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:648-670.
36. Treccani B., Umiltà C., Tagliabue M. Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:268-286.
37. Valle-Inclán F., Redondo M. On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:366-371.
38. Vu K.-P.L. Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: Transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35:1463-1471.
39. Vu K.-P.L., Proctor R.W., Urcuioli P. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory Simon task. Memory and Cognition 2003, 31:1146-1152.
40. Wascher E., Schatz U., Kuder T., Verleger R. Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:731-751.
41. Wiegand K., Wascher E. Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:453-464.
42. Wühr P., Bieble R. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:248-257.
43. Yamaguchi M., Proctor R.W. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: Contributions of specific and general components of manual responses. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:1-10.
44. Zorzi M., Umiltà C. A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research 1995, 58:193-205.