Correction to Pfister, Schroeder, and Kunde (2013) "SNARC Struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations" [Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Advance online publication. May 6, 2013], doi:10.1037/a0032991;SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1953-1958

  Pfister, Roland ^a   Schroeder, Philipp A ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Gratton effect; Numerical cognition; SNARC effect

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887531864     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000001     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731-735. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00002-5.
2. Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1506-1521. doi:10.1037/a0017257.
3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.
4. Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number, and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1831-1840. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0028.
5. Caessens, B., Hommel, B., Reynvoet, B., & van der Goten, K. (2004). Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: The case of the SNARC effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 411-425.
6. Cohen Kadosh, R., Gevers, W., & Notebaert, W. (2011). Sequential analysis of the numerical Stroop effect reveals response suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1243-1249. doi:10.1037/a0023550.
7. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371.
8. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380-390. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380.
9. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594.
10. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110. doi: 10.1080/135467996387552.
11. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00078-7.
12. Fischer, M. H., Mills, R. A., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333-336. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10 .010.
13. Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10-21.
14. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480.
15. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X01000103.
16. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y.
17. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response related-origin. Memory & Cognition, 33, 681-695. doi:10.3758/BF03195335.
18. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. doi:10.3758/BF03194000.
19. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367. doi:10.3758/BF03193413.
20. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149.
21. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249-259. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y.
22. Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2008). "1-2-3": Is there a temporal number line? Evidence from a serial comparison task. Experimental Psychology, 55, 143-150. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.143.
23. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 112-117. doi:10.3758/ BF03193821.
24. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: The reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1197-1207. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5 .1197.
25. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011.
26. Nuerk, H.-C., Bauer, F., Krummenacher, J., Heller, D., & Willmes, K. (2005). The power of the mental number line: How the magnitude of unattended numbers affects performance in an Eriksen task. Psychology Science, 47, 34-50.
27. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.33.
28. Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 74-80. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0133-x.
29. Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Carson, R., & Janczyk, M. (in press). Easy methods for extracting individual regression slopes: Comparing SPSS, R, and Excel. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology.
30. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416.
31. Puccioni, O., & Vallesi, A. (2012). Sequential congruency effects: Disentangling priming and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, 76, 591-600. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0360-5.
32. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro-and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.
33. Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862-868. doi:10.3758/BF03194010.
34. Scherbaum, S., Fischer, R., Dshemuchadse, M., & Goschke, T. (2011). The dynamics of cognitive control: Evidence for within trial conflict adaption from frequency tagged EEG. Psychophysiology, 48, 591-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x.
35. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176-186. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy .2011.06.002.
36. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328-331. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.328.
37. Tan, S., & Dixon, P. (2011). Repetition and the SNARC effect with oneand two-digit numbers. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/ Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65, 84-97. doi: 10.1037/a0022368.
38. van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114-119. doi:10.1016/j .cognition.2010.12.013.
39. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50, 489-525.