Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 894-902

  Suo, Shiteng ^a   Zhang, Kebei ^a   Cao, Mengqiu ^a   Suo, Xinjun ^b   Hua, Jia ^a   Geng, Xiaochuan ^a   Chen, Jie ^a   Zhuang, Zhiguo ^a   Ji, Xiang ^c   Lu, Qing ^a   Wang, He ^d   Xu, Jianrong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient; breast mass; diffusion weighted imaging; heterogeneity; histogram analysis

Indexed keywords

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOGRAM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; BREAST; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FIBROADENOMA; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940986692     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25043     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al., MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-1303.
2. Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E,. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 2011; 378: 1804-1811.
3. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 6144-6152.
4. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al., Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005; 236: 779-788.
5. Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD, et al., Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 126: 273-285.
6. Sun K, Chen X, Chai W, et al., Breast cancer: diffusion kurtosis mr imaging-diagnostic accuracy and correlation with clinical-pathologic factors. Radiology 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
7. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al., Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178.
8. EI Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256: 64-73.
9. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C,. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2646-2655.
10. Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, et al., Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 63-69.
11. Ouyang Z, Ouyang Y, Zhu M, et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging with fat suppression using short-tau inversion recovery: clinical utility for diagnosis of breast lesions. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e337-e344.
12. Hirano M, Satake H, Ishigaki S, Ikeda M, Kawai H, Naganawa S,. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 717-722.
13. Grøvik E, Bjørnerud A, Kurz KD, et al., Single bolus split dynamic MRI: is the combination of high spatial and dual-echo high temporal resolution interleaved sequences useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses? J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42: 180-187.
14. Bogner W, Pinker K, Zaric O, et al., Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T. Radiology 2014; 274: 74-84.
15. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988: 837-845.
16. Bland JM, Altman D,. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307-310.
17. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al., Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009; 253: 341-351.
18. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al., Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 1664-1673.
19. Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G, et al., Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imaging 2012; 3: 573-589.
20. Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, et al., Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 2013; 271: 143-152.
21. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V,. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 342-348.
22. Just N,. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer 2014; 111: 2205-2213.
23. O'Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A,. Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 249-257.
24. Chandarana H, Rosenkrantz AB, Mussi TC, et al., Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer. Radiology 2012; 265: 790-798.
25. Pope WB, Kim HJ, Huo J, et al., Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment. Radiology 2009; 252: 182-189.
26. Suo S-T, Chen X-X, Fan Y, et al., Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 1027-1034.
27. Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, et al., Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 314-320.
28. Gaing B, Sigmund EE, Huang WC, et al., Subtype differentiation of renal tumors using voxel-based histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters. Invest Radiol 2015; 50: 144-152.
29. Mori N, Ota H, Mugikura S, et al., Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2705-2712.
30. Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, Zhang S, Huang B,. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e782-e789.
31. Nogueira L, Brandão S, Matos E, et al., Diffusion-weighted breast imaging at 3 T: preliminary experience. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 378-384.
32. Tan S, Rahmat K, Rozalli F, et al., Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 63-71.
33. Iima M, Yano K, Kataoka M, et al., Quantitative non-Gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Invest Radiol 2015; 50: 205-211.
34. Suo S, Lin N, Wang H, et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison of different curve-fitting methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42: 362-370.
35. Freiman M, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ, et al., Reliable estimation of incoherent motion parametric maps from diffusion-weighted MRI using fusion bootstrap moves. Med Image Anal 2013; 17: 325-336.