Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T

Radiology

Volumn 274, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 74-84

  Bogner, Wolfgang ^a,c   Pinker, Katja ^a   Zaric, Olgica ^a   Baltzer, Pascal ^a   Minarikova, Lenka ^a   Porter, David ^b   Bago Horvath, Zsuzsanna ^a   Dubsky, Peter ^a   Helbich, Thomas H ^a   Trattnig, Siegfried ^a   Gruber, Stephan ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FOUR CHANNEL BREAST COIL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LESION CONSPICUITY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; READOUT SEGMENTED ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ROBUSTNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SINGLE SHOT ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; SUBMILLIMETER IN PLANE RESOLUTION DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; VERY ELDERLY; WHOLE BODY MRI; YOUNG ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84919756034     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132340     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kuhl CK Current status of breast MR imaging. II. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007; 244(3): 672-691.
2. Pinker K, Stadlbauer A, Bogner W, Gruber S, Helbich TH. Molecular imaging of cancer: MR spectroscopy and beyond. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(3): 566-577.
3. Sinha S, Sinha U. Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS. NMR Biomed 2009; 22(1): 3-16.
4. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238(1): 42-53.
5. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009; 253(2): 341-351.
6. Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256(1): 64-73.
7. Costantini M, Belli P, Rinaldi P, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coeffi-cient and tumour aggressiveness. Clin Radiol 2010; 65(12): 1005-1012.
8. Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M, Turnbull LW. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(7): 843-847.
9. Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Marini C, et al. The role of mean diffusivity (MD) as a predictive index of the response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2010; 20(2): 303-308.
10. Park SH, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 2010; 257(1): 56-63.
11. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46(8): 1296-1316.
12. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Thursten B, Lehman CD. Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37(4): 778-790.
13. Martincich L, Deantoni V, Bertotto I, et al. Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers. Eur Radiol 2012; 22(7): 1519-1528.
14. Trattnig S, Zbýň S, Schmitt B, et al. Advanced MR methods at ultra-high field (7 Tesla) for clinical musculoskeletal applications. Eur Radiol 2012; 22(11): 2338-2346.
15. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 2011; 260(2): 364-372.
16. Partridge SC, McKinnon GC, Henry RG, Hylton NM. Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14(4): 433-438.
17. Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH, et al. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparamet-ric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2013; 23(7): 1791-1802.
18. Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H, et al. Identi-fIcation of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging-comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology 2010; 254(2): 357-366.
19. Baltzer PAT, Renz DM, Herrmann KH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(7): 1612-1620.
20. Bogner W, Pinker-Domenig K, Bickel H, et al. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 2012; 263(1): 64-76.
21. Holdsworth SJ, Skare S, Newbould RD, Bammer R. Robust GRAPPA-accelerated diffusion-weighted readout-segmented (RS)-EPI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62(6): 1629-1640.
22. Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62(2): 468-475.
23. Heidemann RM, Porter DA, Anwander A, et al. Diffusion imaging in humans at 7T using readout-segmented EPI and GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64(1): 9-14.
24. Korteweg MA, Veldhuis WB, Visser F, et al. Feasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Invest Radiol 2011; 46(6): 370-376.
25. Wiesinger F, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, De Zanche N, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging performance as a function of fIeld strength: an experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52(5): 953-964.
26. Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004; 3(2): 79-85.
27. Lu L, Erokwu B, Lee G, et al. Diffusion-prepared fast imaging with steady-state free precession (DP-FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68(3): 868-873.
28. Floery D, Helbich TH. MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-patho-logic mismatch. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14(3): 411-425, viii.
29. Koh DM, Blackledge M, Burns S, et al. Combination of chemical suppression techniques for dual suppression of fat and silicone at diffusion-weighted MR imaging in women with breast implants. Eur Radiol 2012; 22(12): 2648-2653.
30. Tudorica LA, Oh KY, Roy N, et al. A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30(9): 1257-1267.
31. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17(3): 205-216.
32. Frost R, Porter DA, Miller KL, Jezzard P. Implementation and assessment of diffusion-weighted partial Fourier readout-segmented echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68(2): 441-451.
33. Rakow-Penner R, Daniel B, Yu H, Sawyer-Glover A, Glover GH. Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23(1): 87-91.
34. Bammer R, Keeling SL, Augustin M, et al. Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001; 46(3): 548-554.
35. Wisner DJ, Rogers N, Deshpande VS, et al. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BIRADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40(3): 674-681.
36. Chen X, Li WL, Zhang YL, Wu Q, Guo YM, Bai ZL. Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 693.
37. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Demartini WB, et al. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters. Radiology 2012; 263(2): 374-382.
38. Müller M, Kühl FC, Großmann P, Vrba P, Mann K. Emission properties of ns and ps laser-induced soft x-ray sources using pulsed gas jets. Opt Express 2013; 21(10): 12831-12842.
39. Kuroki-Suzuki S, Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Nawano S, Moriyama N, Okazaki M. Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6(1): 21-27.
40. Holdsworth SJ, Skare S, Yeom K, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) with Readout-Segmented (Rs)-EPI. Presented at the joint annual meeting of the ISMRM-ESMRMB, Milan, 2014.
41. Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K, Auerbach E, et al. The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective. Neuroimage 2012; 62(4): 2222-2231.