Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2705-2712

  Mori, Naoko ^a   Ota, Hideki ^a   Mugikura, Shunji ^a   Takasawa, Chiaki ^a   Tominaga, Junya ^a   Ishida, Takanori ^a   Watanabe, Mika ^a   Takase, Kei ^a   Takahashi, Shoki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; DCIS; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Invasive carcinoma; Upgrade

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MACROINVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84884813283     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2902-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Silverstein MJ (2000) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Annu Rev Med 51:17-32
2. Brennan ME, Turner RM, Ciatto S et al (2011) Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology 260:119-128
3. Kurniawan ED, Rose A, Mou A et al (2010) Risk factors for invasive breast cancer when core needle biopsy shows ductal carcinoma in situ. Arch Surg 145:1098-1104
4. Wiratkapun C, Patanajareet P, Wibulpholprasert B, Lertsithichai P (2011) Factors associated with upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy using imaging guidance. Jpn J Radiol 29:547-553
5. Rutstein LA, Johnson RR, Poller WR et al (2007) Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 13:251-257
6. Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Tschammler A (2000) Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ? Br J Radiol 73:938-944
7. Goyal A, Douglas-Jones A, Monypenny I, Sweetland H, Stevens G, Mansel RE (2006) Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ?: analysis of 587 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:311-314
8. Huo L, Sneige N, Hunt KK, Albarracin CT, Lopez A, Resetkova E (2006) Predictors of invasion in patients with core-needle biopsy-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 107:1760-1768
9. Hung WK, Ying M, Chan M, Mak KL, Chan LK (2010) The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 17:276-280
10. Bianchi S, Vezzosi V (2008) Microinvasive carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Oncol Res 14:105-111
11. Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 350:1430-1441
12. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H et al (2007) Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 31:394-400
13. Chan S, Chen JH, Agrawal G et al (2010) Characterization of pure ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: do nonhigh grade and high grade show different imaging features? J Oncol 2010:431341
14. Deurloo EE, Sriram JD, Teertstra HJ et al (2012) MRI of the breast in patients with DCIS to exclude the presence of invasive disease. Eur Radiol 22:1504-1511
15. Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2007) BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 13:545-550
16. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA (2003) High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 76:3-12
17. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS (2007) Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 245:684-691
18. Kuhl C, The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I (2007) Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356-378
19. Kuroki-Suzuki S, Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Nawano S, Moriyama N, Okazaki M (2007) Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:21-27
20. Kazama T, Kuroki Y, Kikuchi M et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI as an adjunct to mammography in women under 50 years of age: an initial study. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:139-144
21. Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210-217
22. Inoue K, Kozawa E, Mizukoshi W et al (2011) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment. Jpn J Radiol 29:429-436
23. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T et al (2010) Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol 75:e126-e132
24. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35-42
25. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716-1722
26. Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:217-225
27. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Demartini WB et al (2012) In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters. Radiology 263:374-382
28. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R et al (2011) Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 260:364-372
29. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR et al (2011) Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 21:2011-2019
30. Murakami R, Hirai T, Sugahara T et al (2009) Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method. Radiology 251:838-845
31. Hirano M, Satake H, Ishigaki S, Ikeda M, Kawai H, Naganawa S (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:717-722
32. Lennington WJ, Jensen RA, Dalton LW, Page DL (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Heterogeneity of individual lesions. Cancer 73:118-124
33. Consensus Conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (1997) The Consensus Conference Committee. Cancer 80:1798-1802
34. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664-1673
35. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M et al (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53-60
36. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172-178
37. Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 31:1059-1084
38. Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M et al (2008) Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15-20