Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 63-71

  Tan, S L L ^a   Rahmat, K ^a   Rozalli, F I ^a   Mohd Shah, M N ^a   Aziz, Y F A ^a   Yip, C H ^a   Vijayananthan, A ^a   Ng, K H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLOID CARCINOMA; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSARCOMA PHYLLOIDES; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84890967323     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: 1365229X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S.G. Orel MR imaging of the breast Radiol Clin North Am 38 2000 899 913
2. U. Sivarajan, K.J. Jayapragasam, and Y.F.A. Aziz et al. Dynamic contrast enhancement MRI evaluation of breast lesions - a morphological and quantitative analysis J HK Coll Radiol 12 2009 46 55
3. C. Marini, C. Iacconi, and M. Giannelli et al. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion Eur Radiol 17 2007 2646 2655
4. R.H. El Khouli, M.A. Jacobs, and S.D. Mezban et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging Radiology 256 2010 64 73
5. M. Constantini, P. Belli, and P. Rinaldi et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness Clin Radiol 65 2010 1005 1012
6. S.B. Thakur, D.D. Dershaw, and D. Giri et al. Diffusion MR breast imaging: correlation of ADC values to the prognostic factors Cancer 172 2002 2008
7. S.K. Jeh, S.H. Kim, and H.S. Kim et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma J Magn Reson Imaging 33 2011 102 109
8. American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4th ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston
9. S. Suppiah, K. Rahmat, and M.N. Mohd-Shah et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI Clin Radiol 68 2013 e502 e510
10. C.K. Kuhl, P. Jost, and N. Morakkabati et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience Radiology 239 2006 666 676
11. K. Pinker-Dominig, W. Bogner, and S. Gruber et al. High resolution MRI of the breast at 3T; which BI-RADS descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 22 2012 322 330
12. Y. Guo, Y.Q. Cai, and Z.L. Cai et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 2002 172 178
13. R. Woodhams, K. Matsunaga, and S. Kan et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors Magn Reson Med Sci 4 2005 35 42
14. Y. Kuroki, K. Nasu, and S. Kuroki et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value Magn Reson Med Sci 3 2004 79 85
15. L. Liberman, G. Mason, and E.A. Morris et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 2006 426 430
16. G.G. Lo, V. Ai, and J.K.F. Chan et al. First experiences at 3 T Breast Imaging 33 2009 63 69
17. S. Sinha, F.A. Lucas-Quesada, and U. Sinha et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization J Magn Reson Imaging 15 2002 693 704
18. R. Woodhams, S. Kakita, and H. Hata et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 260 266
19. C.M. Perou, T. Sorlie, and M.B. Eisen et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 406 2000 747 752
20. T. Sorlie Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities Eur J Cancer 40 2004 2667 2675
21. S.C. Partridge, H. Rahbar, and R. Murthy et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics Mag Reson Med 65 2011 1759 1767
22. S.H. Kim, E.S. Cha, and H.S. Kim et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors J Magn Reson Imaging 30 2009 615 620
23. M.I. Yoshikawa, S. Ohsumi, and S. Sugata et al. Relation between cancer cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient values using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer Radiat Med 26 2008 222 226
24. N.A. Mohd Taib, C.H. Yip, and I. Mohamed Survival analysis of Malaysian women with breast cancer: results from University of Malaya Medical Centre Asia Pacific J Cancer Prev 9 2008 197 202