Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2646-2655

  Marini, C ^a   Iacconi, C ^a   Giannelli, M ^b   Cilotti, A ^a   Moretti, M ^a   Bartolozzi, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

E01.370.350.500.150 ; E01.370.350.500 ; Breast A01.236 ; Cells A11 ; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Quantitative E05.337

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CYST; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 41349118080     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group 2006 Reduction in breast cancer mortality from the organised service screening with mammography: validation with alternative analytic methods Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 52 56 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0953
2. SH Taplin CM Rutter JG Elmore D Seger D White RJ Brenner 2000 Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 1257 1262 10789773 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3kvVKgtw%3D%3D
3. EB Cole ED Pisano EO Kistner KE Muller ME Brown SA Feig RA Jong ADA Maidment MJ Staiger SM Kuzmiak RI Freimanis N Lesko EL Rosen R Walsh M Williford MP Braeuning 2003 Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type Radiology 226 153 160 12511684 10.1148/radiol. 2261012024 (Pubitemid 36163923)
4. LW Nunes MD Schnall SG Orel 2001 Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model Radiology 219 484 494 11323476 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mt1eitw%3D%3D
5. MA Jacobs PB Barker DA Bluemke C Maranto A Arnold EH Herskovits Z Bhujwalla 2003 Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging Radiology 229 225 232 14519877 10.1148/radiol. 2291020333 (Pubitemid 37152128)
6. W Huang PR Fisher K Dulaimy LA Tudorica B O'Hea Button 2004 Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity Radiology 232 585 591 15205478 10.1148/radiol.2322030547 (Pubitemid 38971303)
7. F Pediconi C Catalano R Occhiato F Venditti F Fraioli A Napoli MA Kirchin R Passariello 2005 Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine Radiology 237 45 56 16126926 10.1148/radiol.2371041369 (Pubitemid 41346145)
8. A Preda V Novikov M Moglich E Floyd K Turetschek DM Shames TP Roberts C Corot WO Carter RC Brasch 2005 Magnetic resonance characterization of tumor microvessels in experimental breast tumors using a slow clearance blood pool contrast agent (carboxymethyldextran-A2-Gd-DOTA) with histopathological correlation Eur Radiol 15 2268 2275 16012822 10.1007/s00330-005-2823-9 (Pubitemid 41600112)
9. N Morakkabati-Spitz C Leutner H Schild F Traeber C Kuhl 2005 Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI Eur Radiol 15 2010 2017 15841382 10.1007/s00330-005-2755-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvisVGgsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41222910)
10. K Oshida T Nagashima T Ueda H Yagata N Tanabe S Nakano T Nikaidou H Funatsu H Hashimoto M Miyazaki 2005 Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography Eur Radiol 15 1353 1360 15789211 10.1007/s00330-005-2661-9 (Pubitemid 40983517)
11. PJ Basser J Mattiello D Le Bihan 1994 Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin-echo J Magn Reson B 103 247 254 8019776 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXivVyitL0%3D
12. Le Bihan Jf Mangin C Poupon CA Clark S Pappata N Molko H Chabriat 2001 Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications J magn Reson Imaging 13 534 546 11276097 10.1002/jmri.1076 (Pubitemid 32231507)
13. M Cosottini M Giannelli G Siciliano G Lazzarotti MC Michelassi A Del Corona C Bartolozzi L Murri 2005 Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy Radiology 237 258 264 16183935 10.1148/radiol.2371041506 (Pubitemid 41346172)
14. PJ Basser DK Jones 2002 Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis NMR Biomed 15 456 467 12489095 10.1002/nbm.783 (Pubitemid 36054509)
15. J Neil J Miller P Mukherjee S Huppi 2002 Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain-a technical review NMR Biomed 15 543 552 12489100 10.1002/nbm.784 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jis1Wkug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36054514)
16. S Lu D Ahn G Johnson M Law D Zagzag RI Grossman 2004 Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index Radiology 232 221 228 15220505 10.1148/radiol.2321030653 (Pubitemid 38787841)
17. DA Hamstra TL Chenevert BA Moffat TD Johnson CR Meyer SK Mukherji DJ Quint SS Gebarski X Fan CI Tsien TS Lawrence L Junck A Rehemtulla BD Ross 2005 Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 16759 16764 16267128 10.1073/pnas.0508347102 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2MXht1KgsL3M (Pubitemid 41688850)
18. Y Bukte Y Paksoy E Genc AU Uca 2005 Role of diffusion-weighted MR in differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic lesions Clin Radiol 60 375 383 15710142 10.1016/j.crad.2004.05.019 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7js1KgtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40260273)
19. B Taouli V Vilgrain E Dumont JL Daire B Fan Y Menu 2003 Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients Radiology 226 71 78 12511671 10.1148/radiol.2261011904 (Pubitemid 36163910)
20. M Sumi Y Takagi M Uetani, et al. 2002 Diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR imaging of the salivary glands AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 959 965 11906883
21. S Nagata H Nishimura M Uchida N Hayabuchi 2005 Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant musculoskeletal tumors Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 65 30 36 15726897
22. R Woodhams K Matsunaga K Iwabuchi S Kan H Hata M Kuranami M Watanabe K Hayakawa 2005 Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evalution of cancer extension J Comput Assist Tomogr 29 644 649 16163035 10.1097/01.rct.0000171913.74086.1b (Pubitemid 41395779)
23. S Sinha FA Lucas-Quesada U Sinha N DeBruhl LW Bassett 2002 In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization J Magn Reson Imaging 15 693 704 12112520 10.1002/jmri.10116 (Pubitemid 34606504)
24. Y Guo YQ Cai ZL Cai YG Gao NY An L Ma S Mahankali JH Gao 2002 Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 172 178 12203765 10.1002/jmri.10140 (Pubitemid 34810055)
25. T Kinoshita N Yashiro N Ihara H Funatu E Fukum M Narita 2002 Diffusion-weighted half-fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breasr tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 26 1042 1046 12488758 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00033 (Pubitemid 36076728)
26. EO Stejskal JE Tanner 1965 Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent field gradient J Chem Phys 42 288 292 10.1063/1.1695690 1:CAS:528:DyaF2MXisFOrtQ%3D%3D
27. D Le Bihan C Poupon A Amadon F Lethimonnier 2006 Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 24 478 488 16897692 10.1002/jmri.20683 (Pubitemid 44320549)
28. WS Browner TB Newman 1987 Are all significant P values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research JAMA 257 2459 2463 3573245 10.1001/jama.257.18.2459 1:STN:280:BiiC1MbhtVA%3D (Pubitemid 17065843)
29. Glantz SA (2005) Primer of biostatistics. Appleton and Lange,Norwalk
30. Pagano M, Gauvreau K (1999) Principles of biostatistics. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
31. C Beaulieu 2002 The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system-a technical review NMR Biomed 15 435 455 12489094 10.1002/nbm.782 (Pubitemid 36054508)
32. DG Norris 2001 The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment NMR Biomed 14 77 93 11320535 10.1002/nbm.682 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtFeluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32401350)
33. SA Englander AM Ulug R Brem, et al. 1997 Diffusion imaging of human breast NMR Biomed 10 348 352 9471126 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199710)10:7<348: :AID-NBM487>3.0.CO;2-R 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jtF2htg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28028424)
34. SC Partridge GC McKinnon RG Henry NM Hylton 2001 Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measeured in the normal breast using MRI J Magn Res Imaging 14 433 438 10.1002/jmri.1204 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrkvFKqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32906561)
35. R Woodhams K Matzunaga S Kan H Hata M Ozaki K Iwabuchi M Kuranami M Watanabe K Hayakawa 2005 ADC Mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors Magn Res Med Sci 4 35 42 10.2463/mrms.4.35
36. D Le Bihan 1995 Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging Mal Vasc 20 203 214
37. Tavassoli FA (1992) Papillary lesions. In: Tavassoli FA (ed) Pathology of the breast. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, pp 193-227
38. CD Haagensen AP Stout JS Phillips 1951 Papillary neoplasms of the breast. I. Benign intraductal papilloma Ann Surg 133 18 36 14800254 10.1097/00000658-195101000-00002 1:STN:280:Cy6D38botVA%3D
39. CL Mercado D Hamela-Bena C Singer, et al. 2001 Papillary lesions of the breast: evaluation with stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy Radiology 221 650 655 11719659 10.1148/radiol.2213010005 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnntlOrtA%3D%3D
40. L Liberman N Bracero MA Vuolo, et al. 1999 Percutaneous large-core biopsy of papillary breast lesions AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 331 337 9930777 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isl2ltQ%3D%3D
41. CL Mercado D Hamele-Bena SM Oken CI Singer J Cangiarella 2006 Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy Radiology 238 801 808 16424237 10.1148/radiol.2382041839 (Pubitemid 43289910)
42. J Jacquemier L Padovani L Rabayrol SR Lakhani F Penault-Llorca Y Denoux M Fiche P Figueiro V Maisongrosse V Ledoussal J Martinez Penuela N Udvarhely G El Makdissi C Ginestier J Geneix E Charafe-Jauffret L Xerri F Eisinger D Birnbaum Sobol H-European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium 2005 Typical medullary breast carcinomas have a basal/myoepithelial phenotype J Pathol 207 260 268 16167361 10.1002/path.1845 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1agu7bI (Pubitemid 41556449)
43. E Rubesova AS Grell V De Maertelaer T Metens SL Chao M Lemort 2006 Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study J Magn Reson Imaging 24 319 324 16786565 10.1002/jmri.20643 (Pubitemid 44188557)