The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction

Nature

Volumn 525, Issue 7567, 2015, Pages 47-55

  Bauer, Peter ^a   Thorpe, Alan ^a   Brunet, Gilbert ^b  

^a EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS   (United Kingdom)

^b ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CLIMATE PREDICTION; HOMINID; NUMERICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; WEATHER FORECASTING;

BOUNDARY LAYER; COOLING; EVAPORATION; FORECASTING; FRICTION; HEATING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METEOROLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; UNCERTAINTY; WEATHER;

EID: 84940937976     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14956     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Abbe, C. The physical basis of long-range weather forecasts. Mon. Weath. Rev. 29, 551-561 (1901).
2. Bjerknes, V. Das Problem der Wettervorhersage betrachtet vomStandpunkt der Mechanik und Physik. Meteorol. Z. 21, 1-7 (1904).
3. Lazo, J. K., Morss, R. E. & Demuth, J. L. 300 billion served: sources, perceptions, uses, and values of weather forecasts. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 785-798 (2009).
4. Kalnay, E. Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).
5. Richardson, L. F. Weather Prediction by Numerical Process (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1922).
6. Charney, J. G., Fjoertoft, R. & Neumann, J. V. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus 2, 237-254 (1950).
7. Bolin, B. Numerical forecasting with the barotropic model. Tellus 7, 27-49 (1955).
8. Lynch, P. The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 3431-3444 (2008).
9. Robert, A. J. A semi-Lagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration scheme for the primitive meteorological equations. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 60, 319-324 (1982).
10. Staniforth, A., Wood, N. & Côté, J. A simple comparison of four physics-dynamics coupling schemes. Mon. Weath. Rev. 130, 3129-3135 (2002).
11. Williamson, D. L. The evolution of dynamical cores for global atmospheric models. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn B 85, 241-269 (2007).
12. Lorenz, E. N. Reflections on the conception, birth and childhood of numerical weather prediction. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 37-45 (2006).
13. Flato, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013 (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 741-866 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
14. Dudhia, J. A history of mesoscalemodel development. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 121-131 (2014).
15. Zhang, Y. Online-coupled meteorology and chemistry models: history, current status, and outlook. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 2895-2932 (2008).
16. Arakawa, A. Adjustment mechanisms in atmospheric motions. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 75, 155-179 (1997).
17. Williams, P. D. Modelling climate change: the role of unresolved processes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 363, 2931-2946 (2005).
18. Grenier, H. & Bretherton, C. S. A moist PBL parameterization for large-scale models and its application to subtropical cloud-topped marine boundary layers. Mon. Weath. Rev. 129, 357-377 (2001).
19. Arakawa, A. The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future. J. Clim. 17, 2493-2525 (2004).
20. Stensrud, D. J. Parameterization Schemes, Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather Prediction Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
21. Poincare, H. Science and Method (T. Nelson, London, 1914).
22. Thompson, P. D. Uncertainty of initial state as a factor inthe predictability of large scale atmospheric flow patterns. Tellus 9, 275-295 (1957).
23. Lorenz, E. N. Deterministic non-periodical flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130-141 (1963).
24. Slingo, J. & Palmer, T. N. Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 4751-4767 (2011).
25. Zhang, H. & Pu, Z. Beating the uncertainties: ensemble forecastingand ensemble based data assimilation. Adv. Meteorol. 2010, 432160 (2010).
26. Epstein, E. S. Stochastic-dynamic prediction. Tellus 21, 739-759 (1969).
27. Leith, C. E. Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Weath. Rev. 102, 409-418 (1974).
28. Ehrendorfer, M. Predicting the uncertainty of numerical weather forecasts: a review. Meteorol. Z. 6, 147-183 (1997).
29. Palmer, T. N. Towards the probabilistic Earth-system simulator: a vision for the future of climate and weather prediction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138, 841-861 (2012).
30. Lions, J. Contrôle Optimal de Systèmes Gouvernés par des Équations aux Dérivées Partielles (Dunod-Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1968).
31. Lorenc, A.C. Analysismethods for numericalweather prediction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 112, 1177-1194 (1986).
32. Daley, R. Atmospheric Data Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).
33. Navon, I. M. in Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Application (eds Park, S. K. & Xu, L.) 21-65 (Springer, 2009).
34. Courtier, P., Thepaut, J.-N. & Hollingsworth, A. A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 120, 1367-1387 (1994).
35. Rabier, F., Jaervinen, H., Klinker, E., Mahfouf, J.-F. & Simmons, A. The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126, 1143-1170 (2000).
36. Gauthier, P. & Thepaut, J.-N. Impact of the digital filter as a weak constraint in the preoperational 4DVAR assimilation system of Météo-France. Mon. Weath. Rev. 129, 2089-2102 (2001).
37. Rawlins, F. et al. The Met Office global four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 347-362 (2007).
38. Kadowaki, T. A 4-dimensional variational assimilation systemfor the JMA Global Spectrum Model. CAS/JSC WGNE Res. Act. Atmos. Ocea. Modell. 34, 117-118 (2005).
39. Gauthier, P., Tanguay, M., Laroche, S., Pellerin, S. & Morneau, J. Extension of 3DVar to 4D-Var: implementation of 4D-Var at the Meteorological Service of Canada. Mon. Weath. Rev. 135, 2339-2354 (2007).
40. Xu, L., Rosmond, T. & Daley, R. Development of NAVDAS-AR: formulation and initial tests of the linear problem. Tellus A 57, 546-559 (2005).
41. Saunders, R. W., Matricardi, M. & Brunel, P. An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 1407-1425 (1999).
42. Bauer, P., Moreau, E., Chevallier, F. & O'Keeffe, U. Multiple-scatteringmicrowave radiative transfer for data assimilation applications. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132, 1259-1281 (2006).
43. Buehner, M. Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent backgrounderror covariances: evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 1013-1043 (2006).
44. Chapnik, B., Desroziers, G., Rabier, F. & Talagrand, O. Diagnosis and tuning of observational error in a quasi-operational data assimilation setting. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132, 543-565 (2006).
45. Janisková, M. & Lopez, P. in Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrological Applications (eds Park, S. K. & Xu, L.) 251-286 (Springer, 2013).
46. Trenberth, K.E. & Fasullo, J.T. Climate extremes andclimate change: the Russian heat wave and other climate extremes of 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D17103 (2012).
47. Hoskins, B. The potential for skill across the range of the seamless weatherclimate predictionproblem: a stimulus for our science. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.139, 573-584 (2013).
48. Jung, T., Miller, M. J. & Palmer, T. N. Diagnosing the origin of extended-range forecast errors. Mon. Weath. Rev. 138, 2434-2446 (2010).
49. Duc, L., Saito, K. & Seko, H. Spatial-temporal fractions verification for highresolution ensemble forecasts. Tellus A 65, 18171 (2013).
50. Rodwell, M. J., Richardson, D. S., Hewson, T. D. & Haiden, T. A newequitable score suitable for verifying precipitation in numerical weather prediction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136, 1344-1363 (2010).
51. Johnson, C., Bowler, N. & l.. On the reliability and calibration of ensemble forecasts. Mon. Weath. Rev. 137, 1717-1720 (2009).
52. Martin, G. M. et al. Analysis and reduction of systematic errors through a seamless approach to modeling weather and climate. J. Clim. 23, 5933-5957 (2010).
53. Rodwell, M. J. & Palmer, T. N. Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 129-146 (2007).
54. Dole, R. et al. The making of an extreme event: putting the pieces together. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 427-440 (2014).
55. Ferro, C. A. T. & Stephenson, D. B. Extremal Dependence Indices: improved verification measures for deterministic forecasts of rare binary events. Weather Forecast. 26, 699-713 (2011).
56. Yu, H., Chen, P., Li, Q. & Tang, B. Current capability of operational numerical models in predicting tropical cyclone intensity in the western North Pacific. Weather Forecast. 38, 353-367 (2013).
57. Molteni, F., Kucharski, F. & Corti, S. in Predictability of Weather and Climate (eds Palmer, T. & Hagedorn, R.) 365-390 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
58. Lin, H., Brunet, G. & Derome, J. An observed connection between the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden-Julian Oscillation. J. Clim. 22, 364-380 (2009).
59. Barnston, A. G., Tippett, M. K., L'Heureux, M. L., Li, S. & DeWitt, D. G. Skill of Realtime seasonal ENSO model predictions during 2002-11: is our capability increasing? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 631-651 (2012).
60. Baldwin, M. P. & Dunkerton, T. J. Stratospheric harbingers of anomalousweather regimes. Science 244, 581-584 (2001).
61. Scaife, A. A., Knight, J. R., Vallis, G. K. & Folland, C. K. A stratospheric influence on the winter NAO and North Atlantic surface climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18715 (2005).
62. Teng, H., Branstator, G.W., Wang, H., Meehl, G. A. & Washington, W.M. Probability of US heat waves affected by a subseasonal planetary wave pattern. Nature Geosci. 6, 1056-1061 (2013).
63. Frank, W.M. & Roundy, P. E. The relationship between tropicalwaves and tropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Weath. Rev. 134, 2397-2417 (2006).
64. Inness, P. M., Slingo, J.M., Woolnough, S. J., Neale, R.B. & Pope, V.D. Organisation of tropical convection in a GCM with varying vertical resolution; implications of the Madden Julian Oscillation. Clim. Dyn. 17, 777-793 (2001).
65. Koster, R. D. et al. Contribution of land surface initialization to subseasonal forecast skill: first results from the GLACE-2 project. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L02402 (2010).
66. Lin, H. & Brunet, G. The influence of the Madden-Julian oscillation on Canadian wintertime surface air temperature. Mon. Weath. Rev. 137, 2250-2262 (2009).
67. Benoit, R, et al. Toward the use of coupled atmospheric and hydrologicmodels at regional scale. Mon. Weath. Rev. 128, 1681-1706 (2000).
68. Zappa, M. et al. Propagation of uncertainty from observing systems and NWP into hydrological models: COST-731 Working Group 2. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 11, 83-91 (2010).
69. Lauritzen, P. H. & Thuburn, J. Evaluating advection/transport schemes using interrelated tracers, scatter plots and numerical mixing diagnostics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138, 906-918 (2011).
70. Zhang, Y., Bocquet, M., Mallet, V., Seigneur, C. & Baklanov, A. Real-timeair quality forecasting, part II: State of the science, current research needs, and future prospects. Atmos. Environ. 60, 656-676 (2012).
71. Cloke, H. et al. Preface, hydrological ensemble prediction systems. Hydrol. Processes 27, 1-4 (2013).
72. Thorpe, A. J., Bauer, P., Magnusson, L. & Richardson, D. An evaluation of recent performance of ECMWF's forecasts. ECMWF Newsl. 137, 15-18 (2013).
73. Magnusson, L. & Källén, E. Factors influencing skill improvements in the ECMWF forecasting system. Mon. Weath. Rev. 141, 3142-3153 (2013).
74. Holloway, C. E., Woolnough, S. J. & Lister, G. M. S. The effects of explicit versus parameterized convection on the MJO in a large-domain high-resolution tropical case study. Part I: Characterization of large-scale organization and propagation. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 1342-1369 (2013).
75. Hong, S. Y. J. D. Next-generation numerical weather prediction: bridging parameterization, explicit clouds, and large eddies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, ES6-ES9 (2012).
76. Jakob, C. Accelerating progress in global atmospheric model development through improved parameterizations: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 869-875 (2010).
77. Phillips, T. J. et al. Evaluating parameterizations in general circulation models: Climate simulation meets weather prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 1903-1915 (2004).
78. Shin, H. H. & Hong, S.-Y. Analysis of resolved and parameterized vertical transports in convective boundary layers at gray-zone resolutions. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 3248-3261 (2013).
79. Watson, P. A. G., Christensen, H. M. & Palmer, T. N. Does the ECMWF IFS convection parameterization with stochastic physics correctly reproduce relationships between convection and the large-scale state? J. Atmos. Sci. 72, 236-242 (2015).
80. Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Arakawa, A. & Grabowski, W. Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1547-1564 (2003).
81. MacLachlan, C. et al. Global Seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.10.1002/qj.2396 (2014).
82. Molteni, F. et al. The new ECMWF seasonal forecast system (system 4); ECMWF Technical Memoranda no. 656 (ECMWF, Reading, 2011).
83. Gleckler, P. J. Surface energy balance errors in AGCMs: implications for oceanatmosphere model coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L15708 (2005).
84. Cardinali, C. in Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications Vol. II (eds Park, S. K. & Xu, L.) 89-110 (Springer, 2013).
85. Horanyi, A., Cardinali, C., Rennie, M. & Isaksen, L. The assimilation of horizontal line-of-sight wind information into the ECMWFdata assimilation and forecasting system. Part I: The assessment of wind impact. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.2430 (2014).
86. Lorenc, A.C., Bowler, N.E., Clayton, A.M., Pring, S. R. & Fairbairn, D. Comparisonof hybrid-4DEnVar and hybrid-4DVar data assimilation methods for global NWP. Mon. Weath. Rev. 143, 212-229 (2015).
87. Evensen, G. Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter (Springer, 2007).
88. Leeuwen, P. J. V. Efficient non-linear data assimilation in geophysical fluid dynamics. Comput. Fluids. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.11.011 (2011).
89. Brunet, G. et al. Collaboration of the weather and climate communities to advance subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 1397-1406 (2010).
90. Mollick, E. Establishing Moore's law. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 28, 62-75 (2006).
91. Shalf, J., Dosanjh, S. & Morrison, J. in High Performance Computing for Computational Science - VECPAR 2010 (eds Palma, J. M. L. M. et al.) 1-25 (Springer, 2011).
92. Müller, E. H. & Scheichl, R. Massively parallel solvers for elliptic partial differential equations in numerical weather. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 2608-2624 (2014).
93. Palem, K. Ten years of building broken chips: the physics and engineering of inexact computing. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. (TECS) 12, 87:1-87:23 (2013).
94. Lawrence, B. Data Handling on the Path to Exascale; http://old.ecmwf.int/newsevents/meetings/workshops/2014/Scalability/Presentations/pdfs/Lawrence.pdf (presented at ECMWF Scalability Workshop, Reading, 2013).
95. Collard, A. D., McNally, A. P., Hilton, F. I., Healy, S. B. & Atkinson, N. C. The use of principal component analysis for the assimilation of high-resolution infrared sounder observations for numerical weather prediction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136, 2038-2050 (2010).
96. Snik, F. et al. Mapping atmospheric aerosols with a citizen science network of smartphone spectropolarimeters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 7351-7358 (2014).
97. Mahoney, W. P. III & O'Sullivan, J. M. Realizing the potential of vehicle-based observations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 1007-1018 (2013).
98. Hurrell, J. et al. A unified modeling approach to climate system prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1819-1832 (2009).
99. World Meteorological Organization. Seamless Prediction of the Earth System: From Minutes to Months.WMONo. 1156 (WorldMeteorological Organization, Geneva, 2015).
100. Simmons, A. J. & Hollingsworth, A. Some aspects of the improvement in skill of numerical weather prediction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 647-677 (2002).