Hybrid mimics and hybrid vigor in Arabidopsis

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 35, 2015, Pages E4959-E4967

  Wang, Li ^a   Greaves, Ian K ^a   Groszmann, Michael ^a,c   Wu, Li Min ^a   Dennis, Elizabeth S ^a,b   Peacock, W James ^a,b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epigenetics; Heterosis; TCM; Transcriptome; Transregulation

Indexed keywords

ABSCISIC ACID; CHALCONE SYNTHASE; FLAVANONE 3 HYDROXYLASE; FLAVONOID; FLAVONOL DERIVATIVE; FLAVONOL SYNTHASE 1; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; JASMONIC ACID; SALICYLIC ACID; SULFUR; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CELL COUNT; CELL SIZE; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 2; CROSS BREEDING; DOWN REGULATION; ECOTYPE; FAMILY LEAVE; FLOWERING; FRESH WEIGHT; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; HYBRID; LEAF AREA; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; METHYLATION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT CELL; PLANT GENOME; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT SELECTION; SEED YIELD; UPREGULATION; GENETICS; HOMOZYGOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ARABIDOPSIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, PLANT; HOMOZYGOTE; HYBRID VIGOR; PLANT LEAVES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84940857902     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514190112     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Schneeberger K, et al. (2011) Reference-guided assembly of four diverse Arabidopsis thaliana genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(25):10249-10254.
2. Meyer RC, Törjék O, Becher M, Altmann T (2004) Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol 134(4):1813-1823.
3. East EM (1936) Heterosis. Genetics 21(4):375-397.
4. Greaves IK, et al. (2012) Trans chromosomal methylation in Arabidopsis hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(9):3570-3575.
5. Groszmann M, et al. (2011) Changes in 24-nt siRNA levels in Arabidopsis hybrids suggest an epigenetic contribution to hybrid vigor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(6):2617-2622.
6. Greaves IK, et al. (2015) Epigenetic changes in hybrids. Plant Physiol, 10.1104/pp.15.00231.
7. Greaves IK, Groszmann M, Wang A, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2014) Inheritance of Trans Chromosomal Methylation patterns from Arabidopsis F1 hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(5):2017-2022.
8. Chae E, et al. (2014) Species-wide genetic incompatibility analysis identifies immune genes as hot spots of deleterious epistasis. Cell 159(6):1341-1351.
9. Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:71-88.
10. 1 hybrids of tomato and the problem of heterosis in inbreeding crop species. J Agric Sci 53(3):347-353.
11. 5 line performance and estimates of genetic effects in spring wheat. Crop Sci 11(3):357-361.
12. 5 lines from heterotic hybrids in pea. Euphytica 73(3):265-272.
13. Groszmann M, et al. (2014) Intraspecific Arabidopsis hybrids show different patterns of heterosis despite the close relatedness of the parental genomes. Plant Physiol 166(1):265-280.
14. Pavlikova E, Rood SB (1987) Cellular basis of heterosis for leaf-area in maize. Can J Plant Sci 67(1):99-104.
15. Li C, et al. (2014) Ectopic expression of a maize hybrid down-regulated gene ZmARF25 decreases organ size by affecting cellular proliferation in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 9(4):e94830.
16. Fujimoto R, Taylor JM, Shirasawa S, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2012) Heterosis of Arabidopsis hybrids between C24 and Col is associated with increased photosynthesis capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(18):7109-7114.
17. Pyke KA, Leech RM (1991) Rapid image analysis screening procedure for identifying chloroplast number mutants in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Physiol 96(4):1193-1195.
18. Meehan L, Harkins K, Chory J, Rodermel S (1996) Lhcb transcription is coordinated with cell size and chlorophyll accumulation. Plant Physiol 112(3):953-963.
19. Shen H, et al. (2012) Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression changes in two Arabidopsis ecotypes and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell 24(3):875-892.
20. Gruner K, Griebel T, Návarová H, Attaran E, Zeier J (2013) Reprogramming of plants during systemic acquired resistance. Front Plant Sci 4:252.
21. Kalde M, Barth M, Somssich IE, Lippok B (2003) Members of the Arabidopsis WRKY group III transcription factors are part of different plant defense signaling pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16(4):295-305.
22. Ishihama N, Yoshioka H (2012) Post-translational regulation of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15(4):431-437.
23. Xu X, Chen C, Fan B, Chen Z (2006) Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 18(5):1310-1326.
24. Mishina TE, Zeier J (2006) The Arabidopsis flavin-dependent monooxygenase FMO1 is an essential component of biologically induced systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 141(4):1666-1675.
25. Návarová H, Bernsdorff F, Döring AC, Zeier J (2012) Pipecolic acid, an endogenous mediator of defense amplification and priming, is a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity. Plant Cell 24(12):5123-5141.
26. Denancé N, Sánchez-Vallet A, Goffner D, Molina A (2013) Disease resistance or growth: The role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front Plant Sci 4:155.
27. Kempel A, Schädler M, Chrobock T, Fischer M, van Kleunen M (2011) Tradeoffs associated with constitutive and induced plant resistance against herbivory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(14):5685-5689.
28. Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Schabenberger O, Thomashow MF (1998) Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science 280(5360):104-106.
29. Novillo F, Medina J, Salinas J (2007) Arabidopsis CBF1 and CBF3 have a different function than CBF2 in cold acclimation and define different gene classes in the CBF regulon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(52):21002-21007.
30. Msanne J, Lin J, Stone JM, Awada T (2011) Characterization of abiotic stress-responsive Arabidopsis thaliana RD29A and RD29B genes and evaluation of transgenes. Planta 234(1):97-107.
31. Seki M, et al. (2001) Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell 13(1):61-72.
32. Gaffney T, et al. (1993) Requirement of salicylic Acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261(5122):754-756.
33. Grant M, Lamb C (2006) Systemic immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9(4):414-420.
34. Bari R, Jones JD (2009) Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 69(4):473-488.
35. Derksen H, Rampitsch C, Daayf F (2013) Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Sci 207:79-87.
36. Kurihara Y, et al. (2008) Identification of the candidate genes regulated by RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376(3):553-557.
37. Lister R, et al. (2008) Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133(3):523-536.
38. He G, et al. (2010) Global epigenetic and transcriptional trends among two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell 22(1):17-33.
39. Ding H, et al. (2014) Heterosis in early maize ear inflorescence development: A genome-wide transcription analysis for two maize inbred lines and their hybrid. Int J Mol Sci 15(8):13892-13915.
40. Salomé PA, et al. (2012) The recombination landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana F2 populations. Heredity (Edinb) 108(4):447-455.
41. Cortijo S, et al. (2014) Mapping the epigenetic basis of complex traits. Science 343(6175):1145-1148.
42. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z (2010) agriGO: A GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Web Server issue):W64-70.
43. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29(4):1165-1188.